• grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have a trans teenage cousin in Texas. We’re not close, but I worry. All I can really do is let him and his mom know I exist in a “safe” state and hope they reach out if they decide to leave.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I live in TX and see lots of trans people living their lives. It’s a much more purple area though, but we still have a lot of crazies

      • dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, lots of trans people live in Texas and Florida, that’s exactly what is terrifying about these laws - there are real victims.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Oh, last time I saw only Florida had that dubious distinction. They’ve been busy. It’s infuriating what a shithole a large portion of this country has become.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.

    To the contrary, there is evidence that restricting bathroom access is harmful to trans people - and cis people too, like Jay, a cis woman who was harassed in a bathroom after being mistaken for a trans person.

    Even if they use the “right” restroom trans people are in danger of being harassed all the same if they pass too well: https://www.advocate.com/news/2022/7/12/trans-man-brutally-assaulted-using-womens-restroom-campground

    Damned if you do, and damned if you don’t. The point of laws like this isn’t to protect cis women and girls, it’s just to cause as much suffering as possible, because that’s all Republicans care about.

    • valek879
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also there is evidence that it is harmful to cis people. Especially cis women who might be queer or straight or gender nonconforming or not. These fuckwads always forget trans men exist and just harass women more with this shit. They don’t give a fuck off you’re trans or not, it’s about control. And their especially interested in controlling women.

      It’s also directly tied to fascism. Eco points to Machismo in point 12 of Ur-Fascism. “[Fascists hold] both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.” Meaning it’s not just women, trans women, gay men, people outside of traditional 1940s gender roles, but it also includes straight, cis men who just don’t seem to be straight and cis enough.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      harmful to trans people.

      And there’s the true intent of the Republican legislators.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What, we’re supposed to let them use the restroom that matches their identity just because it’s the moral right thing to do, costs us nothing, and the alternative harms everyone!? Sounds like someone is WOKE!!!

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Despite what the law might say, there’s no evidence whatsoever that letting trans people use their preferred bathroom causes any “injury or harm” to cis people.

      Can confirm: Having shared many a bathroom with trans folks and I have managed to survive unharmed. Who would have thunk?

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I was once in a public bathroom. Just when i was about to wash my hands, a women walked in. I was shocked, i looked around and saw that there were urinals, so the lady was in the wrong bathroom, not me. We laughed and then we both left. That was i close one, i tell you.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can confirm: have no idea if I’ve ever shared a bathroom with a trans person because I am there to go to the bathroom, not interact with strangers.

  • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Trans identity supersedes all law, or medical context, or any other bullshit justification for dehumanizing anyone experiencing any form of Gender Dysphoria.

    You as a person reading this have value. Just by your very sentience you have worth. You are loved.

    We will overcome this moment in our history eventually, we may not all live to see it happen but we will. I know that’s an atom of relief in a sea of pain. Don’t let this bullshit dim your shine.

    I love each and every one of you.

    • chaitae3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I was about to ask, what’s with the privacy policy of that site? How can a website that focuses on an oppressed minority be so shitty about their personal data?

      I’m not telling your community what to do, but this seems very unsafe und unwise to use.

    • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Each and every one of those fuckers looks like they’re in a retail store about to demand to speak to someone’s manager.

  • JonEFive@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Some of us remember the coed bathroom featured on the hit 90s show Ally McBeal. It seemed like a progressive but not so far fetched idea at the time. So WTF are we doing still arguing about this 25 years later? These bathroom nazis need to get a grip.

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The real answer. Skip the whole gender thing if it’s an issue. Certainly public restrooms being ungendered entirely won’t be a problem, who knows why we have it this way…

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        who knows why we have it this way…

        The answer is sexism. When women started to enter the workforce there was concern that they would get “overwhelmed”, so gendered bathrooms were created to give them a space they could go to that feels like the home.

          • yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            No, bathrooms are a fairly modern invention that evolved from outhouses, which are gender neutral, or chamberpots, which are generally made specifically for one person. The invention of the modern bathroom with indoor plumbing came about in large, male only factories, and then a new environment, the restaraunt.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Agreed. I’ve never cared what the person who uses my bathroom at home has between their legs. Why should I care in a public bathroom?

  • felix@pnw.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Any allies game to go to the mayor’s office and conduct a shit-in?

    Can’t legally use a bathroom? Let’s go on the floor.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I can legally shit in any room. I even have a card somewhere licensing me to do so. My shits are the stankiest. I can’t make it to Odessa until 11/1 (i have an appointment today) but I will gladly drop a deuce directly in his office.

      edit: i just got home from my appointment I need a flight to odessa if we’re gonna do this

      edit: I’ve been saving up. It’s gonna be a très

      • Aeri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        “PROVE, THAT YOU HAVE THE STRENGTH AND COURAGE, TO BE FREE” They said, shitting on the floor

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      There should be a name for this. “The constituent letter” or “The Pelosi kiss” or maybe “The MAGA crayon.”

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Johnathan Gooch, communications director for Equality Texas, told the Texas Tribune, “It’s a very aggressive way to alienate trans people from public life, and I think it is counter to the spirit of friendship that most Texans embody.”

  • unphazed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cool, they got a useless law to “protect” children. Where is the law that protects them in churches/camps/etc?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why would they do that? These laws are there to convince ma and pa dipshit that child predators are trans people not a group that’s not open or openly or formally organized and consists of people in all strata of society. In short these laws are to protect the pedos in power from suspicion

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    While the bounty is set to a minimum of $10,000, there is no cap on how large the bounty can be.

    • Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Call in every dude who enters the bathroom. Surely one of them will get you paid and the rest will sure be happy to be checked in whatever barbaric method I’m sure they’ve planned out.

      Stupid laws like this assume that it’s only ‘perverted men’ who want to put on dresses and don’t actually have any thoughts grounded in reality. Every single time a law like this gets enacted it’s the job of everyone to waste as much government funding as possible so they quickly rethink their stupid bigoted schemes.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Call in every dude who enters the bathroom. Surely one of them will get you paid and the rest will sure be happy to be checked in whatever barbaric method I’m sure they’ve planned out.

        I’d recommend starting with the bathroom at City Hall.