• Zloubida@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Shitty people have used religion, enterprises, family, schools, means of transportation, chance, political institutions, culture, arts, … to do shitty things to other people.

    The problem is not religion per se. The problem is shitty people. Stop searching excuses for their acts.

    • agamemnonymous
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      He didn’t actually, one of his major gripes was with corrupt hypocritical religious leaders.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    “Religion is not harmless” is about as intellectually honest as “Guns don’t kill people.”

  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Drag doesn’t believe in religion. Which is to say, drag thinks there’s no such thing. It’s not coherently defined. If religion is about belief in gods, what about Buddhism? If religion is about belief in the supernatural, then there are no religions, because everyone thinks their beliefs are part of the world, ie nature. If religion is about organised belief, then schools and universities are religion. That’s not an attack on the beliefs schools teach; schools teach very important things like maths and spelling, and they organise belief on those subjects.

    • Zloubida@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Religious studies were my major at university. I know far less about what religion is now than before I studied it… there’s as much definitions of religion as there are scholars of religion.

    • Ookami38
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      When boiled down, religions are essentially just a way of coping with the unknowable. The exact specifics of our origin, what happens to the thing we call “ourselves” after death, and usually an idea of how to be a better person. These themes are pretty consistent across everything we’d colloquial agree is a “religion”.

      The issues only really arise when someone insists that these unknowable, unquantifiable things that they believe in MUST be the only way, and anyone who doesn’t believe the same way is somehow a threat. I believe that ones beliefs with regard to these unknowable things are deeply personal. They’re arrived at by understanding one’s self, and a LOT of introspection. It’d be weird if any two people managed to arrive at an agreement on everything, and that’s okay because the beliefs are built on internal factors rather than external.

      Organized religion, then, is bullshit, yeah. Anyone pushing answers for questions unanswerable is pushing an agenda. I doubt anything approaching the level of group think that is modern abrahamic religions could ever exist without some kind of power struggle.

      • infinite_ass@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        A story about something you never saw, received tenth-hand via a morass of scholars and politicians. Yes, let’s analyze it. Ugh.

        • Ookami38
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s really more a cult than a religion. As much as “hahah all religions are cults LoL”, there is a distinct difference between them.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            Drag isn’t a sociologist, but drag is pretty sure the set of cults is contained within the set of religions.

            • Ookami38
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Right. All cults are, ostensibly, religions. That doesn’t mean that it works in the other way. Not all religions are cults.

              • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 days ago

                Right, so if Trumpism is a cult, it must be a religion. And it’s a religion that isn’t concerned with the creation of the universe, the afterlife, or how to live well. So your definition of religion based on it answering unknowns can’t be right.

                • Ookami38
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  There’s a reason I said “ostensibly”. Cults co-opt the religious umbrella in order to manipulate. They rely on the same kinds of psychology that religions do, often touch on the same kinds of topics. Trumpism is more a cult of personality than a proper religious cult.

                  Either way, to equate any kind of spiritually and religion with one of the most obvious examples of someone heading a cult is at BEST disingenuous. I’m not here to talk about cults. Cults suck, they’re the opposite of what I described earlier. Intensely external, entirely about control.