• bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Oh yay more whittling down of an already conglomerated industry surely this will be good for people

    • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Japanese companies have a history of consolidating to be able to compete with foreign companies. This is in response to the sudden rise of Chinese companies and China replacing Japan as the top automotive exporter.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That sounds like a disaster for Honda. Nissan doesn’t hardly have anything to offer except supply/sales volume. Honda beats them on engine tech, transmission tech, chassis tech, basically everything. Honda has lots to lose by taking on their mess, and Nissan doesn’t.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        That’s still only a single model that is <8% of Nissan’s already abysmal US sales volume. Nissan’s massive pile of garbage that fills up the rest of portfolio (and institutional problems behind the scenes) is absolutely NOT worth dealing with for the technology in a single model like that, even if it is “necessary” to offer to ensure compliance eith wishy washy regulatory soon-to-be’s. They would be much better off clean-slating their own, EV tech is significantly easier to develop compared to new ICE designs and if anyone is capable of that, it’s Honda.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It’s a single model and virtually the only model of EV less affluent Americans can afford. That’s a huge market.

          • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            It is a big, untapped market but it’s not a big market for the Leaf. Tesla sold 3x more Model 3 in the last year alone than Nissan has sold in the entire 14 year production run of the Leaf. It’s a hot mess.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              The Model 3 is over $40,000. It’s selling more because Americans are barely even aware cheaper EVs exist.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Except the chevy volt is in the same sub 30k category and they handily beat the pants off of the leaf in range. The leaf only gets a meager 149 miles per charge. The volt can go about 100 miles further and has the ability to charge faster.

            • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              ? I own a leaf and get 215 miles per charge… Plus for most peoples the 149 on the base model is fine to go to work and back daily

              2020 leaf sv plus owner here. Range is 212 officially but when my car is full charge it tells me 215 iirc

              • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Why are you giving a question mark? The only leaf under $30k is the base with a 149 mile range. The sv plus with the 212 range is like $37k. That’s $10,000 more than a volt and still like 30 or 40 miles less range.

                Also, yes, 149 would be enough for most people who never want a vehicleto take out of town, but you’re leaving out a huge amount of problems with a range like that. First, if you’re going to charge it every day it means you better own a house and garage to keep it in and charge, because charging stations for 45 minutes every other day or so would be terrible to deal with. Then if you live in a place where it gets really cold that mileage will be hacked down to about 110 miles. Plus, your battery will not last nearly as long if you have to use most of its range all the time and always have to charge it up to 100% full. Charging an EV up to just 80% or so capacity and recharging it at about 20% will literally double the lifespan of the battery. A small capacity EV like that won’t last nearly as long as one with a bigger battery.

    • fuzzywombat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I absolutely agree with you there. For consumer space this merger doesn’t make sense for Honda. For Nissan share holder, this is fantastic… Only thing I can think of is Nissan has some EV tech that Honda could use but that’s quite the stretch. Nissan actually jumped into EV relatively early but they didn’t iterate on it quickly enough to matter. Honda has been dragging their feet on EV and they both completely missed the boat on bridge tech offering like plug in hybrid. This merger isn’t going to do anything to fix that.

      Since Nissan is now a low end brand and Honda is moving more towards premium side perhaps being together would cover the market segments better. The merger absolutely does nothing for the high end market though.

      The one thing that I don’t know anything about is the commercial market domestically in Japan. Perhaps Nissan has good market share which Honda could gain from this merger. Maybe someone could chime in on this.

    • Lag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Public perception is also a factor. Even seeing collaborated cars like their EV Chevy thing takes away from Honda’s perception of reliability.

  • SGforce@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Nissan has been a dumpster fire for two decades. Honda should steer clear.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Nissan holds a majority stake with Mitsubishi. That actually might be worth something to Honda, and they also seem to be able to produce some cheap evs, like the leaf which Honda doesn’t seem able to do currently.

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Mitsubishi the conglomerate or Mitsubishi the automaker? The former seems good but not the latter.

        • Addv4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Auto I believe, but that still might be useful. They have access to Cummins engines, which are basically one of the only manufacturers that meet the next phase of ghg emissions requirements. Plus since Honda seems to be retooling their factories for solid state batteries, it might allow them to produce some stop gap evs without relying on other manufacturers like GM (Hondas latest is just a rebadged Chevy Blazer EV).

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I dunno. There are some very enthusiastic Honda fanboys that will be watching like a hawk.

      This could just be Nissan reading the writing on the wall and choosing to do something about it before it’s too late.

      Honda still needs to rely on more than “nationalism” to sell their cars, unlike American brands.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Drop a honda NA 4 cylinder drivetrain into a nissan vehicle and sell it for a lower price than a Honda and I’d be cool with it. Nissans only really issue is their engines and trannys they use.

      • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        A good point, but I do like the observation that the only problems Nissan has are with the two most important parts of a vehicle.

        This is some pretty good spaghetti, just the noodles and sauce are trash.