Rising sea levels driven by the climate crisis will overwhelm many of the world’s biggest oil ports, analysis indicates.

Scientists said the threat was ironic as fossil fuel burning causes global heating. They said reducing emissions by moving to renewable energy would halt global heating and deliver more reliable energy.

Thirteen of the ports with the highest supertanker traffic will be seriously damaged by just 1 metre of sea level rise, the analysis found. The researchers said two low-lying ports in Saudi Arabia – Ras Tanura and Yanbu – were particularly vulnerable. Both are operated by Aramco, the Saudi state oil firm, and 98% of the country’s oil exports leave via these ports.

The oil ports of Houston and Galveston in the US, the world’s biggest oil producer, are also on the list, as are ports in the United Arab Emirates, China, Singapore and the Netherlands.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    And why would todays leaders care, if these ports become unusable in 80-200 years?

  • blueamigafan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    They will be when public funds get used to prop up an ‘important economy’ In the ‘nations interest’

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Public funds, private profits.

      This generation fucking sucks.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait wait wait, i thought it was centimeters. Now suddenly they are talking about a meter and even 3 meters.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not sure why you thought it was just centimeters but yeah, shit’s gonna get bad from what I’ve been reading.

      • Tgo_up@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d like to see those sources. Sea level rise is sloooow!

        • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well I have good news for you! The article you are commenting at this very moment on is such a source!

          Congratulations on your good fortune friend.

          • Tgo_up@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Thank you. I read through the article and it does indeed say that scientist think we could experience 10m sea level rise over the coming centuries.

            I read a lot about this issue around 10 years ago but I can see that the scientific consensus has changed since then.

  • xmunk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    We call this process “healing”.