I think it could be useful to collect this data, both for administrative and research purposes.

I’m unsure, currently, exactly what data should be collected by the censuses (that would be proposed and discussed here). The data that is collected, should be collected anonymously. Furthermore, participation should be entirely voluntary.

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Nah, that idea can bugger right off.

    Lemmy doesn’t need a “corpus of data”. Researchers can either request that people contribute, or they can bugger right off and scrape like anyone else.

    Admins don’t need demographic data at all.

    • KalciferOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      […] Admins don’t need demographic data at all.

      What makes you so certain of that?

      • southsamurai
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Because it’s lemmy, not some corporate bullshit.

        They might want it, but they don’t need it

        • KalciferOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          […] They might want it, but they don’t need it

          For clarity, if admins do want (not necessarily need) the survey data, you would still oppose it? If so, why?

          • southsamurai
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            They can fuck right off.

            Why? Because they don’t need to know shit about you, me, or the cookie monster as long as we follow the rules.

            If I wanted some random stranger to know about me for their own purposes, I’d sign up for Facebook.

            Even a voluntary survey is defeating the purpose of avoiding corporate forums. Why are they gathering the data? What are they going to do with it? How can we be assured they’re destroying the data even if we are okay with their goal? Nah. It’s a step in the wrong direction for lemmy as a whole.

            • KalciferOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              […] Even a voluntary survey is defeating the purpose of avoiding corporate forums. Why are they gathering the data? What are they going to do with it? How can we be assured they’re destroying the data even if we are okay with their goal? Nah. It’s a step in the wrong direction for lemmy as a whole.

              I could certainly be misinterpreting, but your statement seems to imply that the census is intended to be non-anonymous and that it won’t be publicly released. For clarity, I am proposing a census whose data is anonymously collected, and will be publicly released by the admins once completed. Although, from this statement:

              How can we be assured they’re destroying the data even if we are okay with their goal? Nah. It’s a step in the wrong direction for lemmy as a whole.

              Perhaps you don’t trust that they’ll release the data? If so, perhaps there would be a way to publicly host the data live as it comes in?

            • KalciferOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              […] Why? Because they don’t need to know shit about you, me, or the cookie monster as long as we follow the rules. […]

              You specify that they “don’t need to know”. I was specifically proposing a hypothetical where they only had some level of desire for the data and not a need.