Argentina's president says he has banned gender-affirming care for people under age 18. A presidential spokesperson said Wednesday the government was repealing a 2012 gender identity law provision allowing such practices with parental or guardian consent.
Your comment still stands like that.
We’re not talking about “body modifications”. We are talking about gender affirming care. You may pretend it’s “body modification” but like most people have said, all of your rhetoric relies on an asinine view of a kid being able to just go up to their liberal parents and say “I want a complete gender reassignment” and get it, when any trans person goes through tons of psychiatrists and evaluations. They’re not given anything that we haven’t found to be medically safe. Which is why your “body modifications” of some absurd dick size and bone lengthening at an age where you’re still growing wouldn’t be accepted by any medical professionals as “gender affirming care.”
It’s a childish strawman which you use to justify an extremely shitty slippery slope argument. Puberty blockers are safe and effective.
Based on your answers, I assume you must be fervently against circumcision, because that is a literal permanent physical change to one’s genitals, and the kid doesn’t even have a say in it, much less making the choice for themselves when “they’re old enough to have a drink over it.” So you oppose allowing circumcision unless it’s medically necessary. You also oppose teenage males who get bullied for having tits getting care for that extremely simple problem. That’s the only logical conclusion from your rhetoric.
Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers
Which since talking to other people I leavened of CPP but that’s literally health problems so it’s deffrnrt.
But, your making up stuff and trying to mold the arguem t so your right.
Ans lastly cause you wanna add it in, yeah I am against circumcision. But keep changing the argument
RIP little Timmy, he could have lived with chemo but [email protected] doesn’t want children to take drugs.
So I don’t ad life altering drugs one time and you pounce on it? There’s obviously a diffrnence between life altering and life saving drugs. Way to take one except out of context.
Gross
Chemo alters life quite a bit, I mean it’s pretty much poison.
So no healthcare for children, got it. No operations for fat boys with moobs, no circumcisions and since you phrase it that way, guess no medication for any other illnesses either, huh? And the reason for this asinine take is the view that you think that children can simply go to a doctors and command them to give them full gender reassignments.
Your ignorance has been the issue the whole time. You’re afraid of a problem which doesn’t exist and because of that you want to make life miserable for those you pretend you’re looking out for. It’s horrific, tbh.
“Making up stuff.” Name one.
And now you’re spamming typos on purpose to even further pretend like you never edited anything to add anything to your comment, despite there being “edit” and “edit edit” and several sentences with those. Who do you think you’re lying to?
Making stuff up?
And I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There’s no winnignwith you
No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.
You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.
You added several sentences. You didn’t just “fix typos”.
I also fixed typos after proofreading. Takes a whole of twenty seconds as you can see.
No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.
Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?
#No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.
Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.
Not before I had already replied to you.
Idk what to tell you. Maybe you already had the threads loaded. Maybe my client needed an extra minute to update right there. I went back to my comment immediately after to add the edit and edit edit.
Do you want me to be more sketch next time and not even try to add that I edited my comment. Or maybe next tiem I’ll add timestamps of when I edit every single word or sentence. But you’re taking this way too far.
My original common, which minimally changed to clarify my messups, didn’t have anything to do with surgery’s, talked about my wanting a bigger dick, and stated people should be able tonexpress how they feel just no life altering drugs.
Even what I added after doesn’t change what inworte. Even though I added them immediately
I do know what to tell you.
You wrote a comment, I read it, replied it to it, and whilst I was replying to it, you started editing it, then I posted my comment and then you posted your edit.
Nothing weird about it. And still, you don’t say you suffered from moobs, do you? So how is me bringing that up me calling you fat just for pointing out that more cis males have gender affirming care than trans people, statistically? You were wrong to say I was calling you fat, because I wasn’t. But you can’t say “I was mistaken in thinking you called me fat.”
“It didn’t say anything about surgeries”
You might as well have been talking about pasta in general and then start crying when I bring up spaghetti, saying “I was talking about pasta, it has nothing to do with spaghetti!” One is a subcategory of the other. “Gender affirming care” includes within it gender affirming surgeries.
And how exactly would you go about getting a bigger dick without a surgery, pray tell?