- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/37465506
Greedy fake Christian appoints greedy fake Christian
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/37465506
Greedy fake Christian appoints greedy fake Christian
tf kind of a news source is “the daily beast”? That sounds like an r34 subr*ddit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Beast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoop_(novel)
I mean, the founder has good credentials and the name is literally from a satirical book about sensationalist journalism, which vibes with the publication being described as a “high-end tabloid.”
Plus it’s a well known publication and has been for a decade.
Some dudes just love telling on themselves.
For me it’s just confusion because of how I personally handle things.
If I find an unusual source… I research the source. I find as much information as I can to figure out how trustworthy the source is. It’s basically automatic.
So I don’t really understand the “I’m just gonna say I’ve never heard of this because I can’t be bothered to look something up in under 30 seconds” especially when it comes to more well-known publications.