The president of Mexico on Thursday expressed hope that Google “reconsiders” its decision to change its online maps to reflect U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that he has the authority to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order announcing he was changing the name of the body of water to the Gulf of America.

For U.S. users of Google Maps, the gulf was listed as the Gulf of America as of Thursday. Google, whose CEO attended Trump’s inauguration along with other tech moguls, said last month it has “a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources.”

But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday that her government “will file a civil suit” against Google if it does not revert back to labeling the international body of water the Gulf of Mexico.

  • bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Google also removed the ability to suggest edits to specifically the Gulf.

    Guess they knew ahead of time they’d get an influx of requests to change or back.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Republicans are so good at baiting liberals into useless bullshit arguments, while they plunder stuff that actually matters.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 days ago

    I want to know how many of the people here defending Google’s decision would be okay with Google labeling Taiwan as “Taiwan (Chinese Taipei)” for people in Taiwan and also the rest of the world.

  • ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    224
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Why bother with this? If you want to make a point, pass regulation in Mexico to call E.E.U.U. (US in Mexico) be called Northern Mexico. Then Google is forced to comply on that territory like they claim they do for disputed sections when maps are viewed from that region. It would make for some funny reactions from people visiting Cancun or Puerto Vallarta.

    Edit: plus it would show how stupid the whole rename thing is to begin with.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      183
      ·
      5 days ago

      TIL…

      The abbreviation E.E.U.U. (often written as EE. UU.) stands for Estados Unidos (United States) in Spanish. This abbreviation follows a grammatical rule in Spanish where doubling the initial letters of each word indicates plurality

      So you taught me something today I did not know. Thank you!!

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 days ago

        Interestingly (or not) it’s also used in French but only in one case that I’m aware of. Monsieur is abbreviated to M. while messieurs (plural) is MM.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        See, I learned this in Spanish class in my American high school, and I don’t think that linguistic fact stuck with me! Thanks

      • lolrightythen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Just let our mexican and Canadian neighbors take over the USA. We’ve proven to be unworthy of making wise choices.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Wait what do they call the European Union then because that’s still EU in Spanish as well.

        • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s UE in Spanish, from Unión Europea. (Non-doubled letters because it’s a single Union, there’s no plural like in “States”).

          Sometimes people in Spain do use the English acronyms for both EU/USA, but I don’t think I’ve seen it often. Both UE and EEUU are more common from what I’ve seen, and also people rarely say these out loud, it’s exclusively a written language problem.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If we’re going to play that demagogic game, why not make “United States of America” be shown as “United States of North America” to reclaim the continent name back? Companies will comply if it’s an official request.

    • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Currently in Mexico, it displays the name your phone region is set to. It still shows Gulf of America on my phone, even when I am on Mexican WiFi.

    • 13roses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Google is one of many propaganda arms of the US govt. I highly doubt they’d comply with that as it doesn’t fit in with their political agenda.

    • AJ1@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      it really sucks when you realise that virtually everything is a US company… and yet everything they sell is made in fucking China

    • Lukas Murch@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      My phone is a Pixel on Google Fi, and I have a YouTube premium account. I’ve got a lot of work ahead of me :( lol

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah. I’ll start boycotting google when there are useful alternatives. Amazon, facebook, reddit - no problem.

      Google search - fine, I can get by with DDG or Yandex. Gmail - sure, whatever. Maps? Organic Maps (and other openstreetmaps front-ends) works alright for getting your bearings, but it’s a far cry from useful for finding businesses, and terrible for navigation. Waze used to be the only viable alternative, but ever since Google bought them, it’s hard to justify a full boycott without massively inconveniencing myself.

      Same for meta as a whole. Facebook and Instagram, sure, no need. But living without whatsapp is simply impossible in some countries, where it’s the de-facto standard for communication, and even used as the only means of contact with government agencies.

      • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If you disapprove of internet companies caving to authoritarian politics, I have bad news for you about Yandex

      • TWB0109@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fr, I try, but it’s really not possible to get away from these companies.

        Nobody wants signal, nobody wants mastodon, nobody wants or frankly can use openstreetmaps. Alternatives are just not good enough

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Alternatives are just not good enough

          And to no fault of their own of course. They just aren’t working with the same resources as Google and the others.

          I think it’s more a question of stepping down our level of comfort at this point. Can we live without a particular service that Google provides, when there are no alternatives with feature parity? Or can we live with the fact that some of the features aren’t working as well or missing, and use the alternatives anyway?

          • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Exactly. If there were perfectly interchangeable alternatives, there would have been a true competition and those companies wouldn’t be holding the amount of power they do today in the first place.

            Moving to alternatives requires some degree of effort and giving up on some microconforts. There’s no other way. There’s no fight without any pain. If we want to fight those companies, we must sacrifice those micro conforts, even if that means reducing tech use as a whole and doing a few things the “old fashioned” way.

  • Cethin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Everyone needs to get used to ignoring this bullshit. The Gulf of America thing isn’t important. It doesn’t effect anyone, and there’s far too many posts about it when there are real things to pay attention to. This is purely a distraction. Stop giving it attention.

    • archchan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s the details that make up the whole picture.

      As an isolated situation, the renaming thing may be stupid and not worth giving any credence. Energy can be spent resisting elsewhere in more useful places. However along with the rest of the actions of billionare corpos that kissed the ring, it’s part of the overall trend with devastating consequences. Bullshit details shouldn’t be ignored, but acknowledged as “they’re fucking us from all directions right now and waging war on reality, and we really should stop letting them”.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s definitely a distraction tactic, but at the very least looking at Google Maps and Bing Maps makes very clear to people which megacorps are riding the oligarchy; just in case anyone held hope their favorite “techbro revolutionary” might side with them. PS: Mapquest gets it right.

    • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nah it actually matters more than you think. As an American you might think this is okay, but its not. And Trump getting away with whatever he wants all the time is because of enabling

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        For sure. It’s just that this isn’t the part that matter. This is part of the enabling. If you’re paying attention here you don’t see the other thing over there. It’s slight of hand. You only have so much attention, and it’s better spent where it actually has an effect. This will be reversed with the next president.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Where will the lawsuit be filed in?

    Mexican courts? Good luck getting an American company to comply.

    US Courts, well… surely no judge would be biased right? glances at the composition of the US Supreme court

    International Courts? Lol like they have any power at all.

    Reminds me of The Expanse:

    “Earth Court? Mars Court? What Inner court gives Belters justice?”

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      5 days ago

      Mexican courts? Good luck getting an American company to comply.

      Why not? Brazilian courts ordered Twitter to ban some people, Twitter refused, court treated to jail Brazilian Twitter legal representatives, Twitter closed their Brazilian office to shield itself from Brazilian courts, Brazilian courts ordered ISPs to block Twitter because they had no legal representatives on the country, after a couple of weeks without Brazilian access Twitter bow down, rehired their legal representatives and complied with Brazilian court orders.

      Don’t see why Mexican courts couldn’t do the same with Google Maps.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        By “comply”, I mean like getting them to revert the map rename. Kicking them out and blocking them isn’t really getting them to “comply”

        By contrast, if the US government wanted Google to do something, they could storm their headquarters and get the government tech people to go in the servers and change it (Edit: after obtaining a court order to do so, obviously).

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          if the US government wanted Google to do something, they could storm their headquarters and get the government tech people to go in the servers and change it.

          Bwahahahahahahainhalehahahahahahaa

          Thanks, I needed that. Whatever movies you’re watching are terrible.

          Forcing your way into Google to have “government techs” change something is NCIS level ridiculous. Conceivably they might get a court order to “force” Google to change. Funnily enough, the US and Mexico have the exact same levers to make a company do what they want. The US has more power to push those levers though.

          • phlegmy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 days ago

            We’ll see who’s laughing after the government breaks through all of Google’s firewalls and hacks their mainframe!
            They’re gonna need a lot of cyber-tape if they want any chance of stopping all the data from spilling through their firewalls.
            And who knows how google would handle a cyber-nuke.

        • funkless_eck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          Mexico is a big country, Google has shareholders who demand line goes up, people use maps to advertise (“map pack” “local SEO” and brand tie-ins)…

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      In order to do business in Mexico, they must agree to Mexican laws.

      In order to do business in Canada, they must follow Canadian laws.

      In order to do business in the US, they must follow US laws kiss the ring.

      This isn’t the first time big tech has had to tackle something like this. Usually it’s with disputed territory. In that case, each region gets to see what it demands to see, while presenting something different to the rest of the world.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The suit should be by an American cartography company over the proper US Board on Geographic Names’s official process not being followed for the name change.

      I’m actually submitting a name change to the board through the official process. But since the USGS added a bit to the process saying that resetablishing historical names isn’t a reason for a name change, I’m going to recommend it be changed to “The Gulf,” since it meets all criteria for a name change - most importantly that it be a name in common usage by locals. Lots of people refer to it as “The Gulf,” while “Gulf of America” isn’t in common usage.

      The most we can do outside of lawsuits is at least try to take the “America” part away.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m going to recommend it be changed to “The Gulf,” since it meets all criteria for a name change - most importantly that it be a name in common usage by locals.

        So now when I refer to “The Gulf States”, I’m typically referring to Alabama and Florida and Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

      • MuadDoc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        the proper US Board on Geographic Names’s official process not being followed for the name change.

        This is the theme of this administration. Doing whatever they want with no regard for process. This gulf of “America” nonsense truly feels like the actions of a believed king or emperor. A frivolous decree that doesn’t change anything, doesn’t materially affect anything, just an opportunity to exercise their believed power.

    • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      First, what laws are violated? Doubt international law touches this, US law maybe?

      edit: Why the F do you downvote me? This is an honest question. I really dislike Trump, but I don’t see what laws this violates, except maybe US laws regarding the separation of powers-

    • Kalysta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      It looks like they’re giving the lawyers time to find legal arguments to file.

      Though they could jusr ban Google from their country.

    • wanderingmagus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      And for the love of god do not switch over to another American company, or any company, go FOSS and decentralized

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      God I hope this happens, it will be absolutely hilarious when the GCP services on which MX infraestructure for telecommunications, research and development, industry, transportation, banking, agriculture, logistics and health is built up, crashes burning to the ground.

  • merc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What’s dumb about this is that in their jurisdiction (Mexico) it is actually the “Gulf of Mexico” in Google Maps, they don’t get the “Gulf of America” name. In the US it’s labelled as “Gulf of America” without mentioning “Gulf of Mexico” which you could argue Google has to do because it (theoretically) follows national laws everywhere it operates.

    That’s why Korean users don’t see the Sea of Japan to their east, they see the East Sea. That’s why in some locations the Persian Gulf is referred to as the Arabian Gulf instead. It’s also why inside India the borders you see for Kashmir don’t match the borders you see for Kashmir if you’re in Pakistan. The rest of the world sees a third version of that area with areas marked as disputed.

    What’s really annoying is that every other country in the world is exposed to this “Gulf of America” silliness, even countries where people don’t speak English. I can understand (just barely) having “(Gulf of America)” under “Gulf of Mexico” in English-speaking countries because if someone is hearing news from a US source and they refer to the Gulf of America, it might be useful to know what they’re talking about. It’s in the news now, but in 3 years say you’re a high-school kid trying to do a geography report and can’t find the feature on the map, that could be annoying.

    But, this parenthesis rule apparently even extends to Germany, where it’s “Golf von Mexiko (Golf von Amerika)”. There’s no reason to include a name that doesn’t exist in your language on your version of the maps app. If I, as an English-maps user look at Germany, I don’t get Munich (Munchen). I don’t get Florence (Firenze), I don’t get India (Bhārat). There’s a long-standing tradition that maps show things in the name that’s local to the map user. Sometimes, over time, a name gets changed to be closer to the way it’s said in the local language, so Peking became Beijing.

    Also, google addressed this in a blog post from 2008, almost literally describing this situation:

    “How Google determines the names for bodies of water in Google Earth … if a ruler announced that henceforth the Pacific Ocean would be named after her mother, we would not add that placemark unless and until the name came into common usage”

    Other than the ruler not being female, the body of water being a different one, and “America” not being Donald Trump’s mother, this is the exact situation.

    Edit: I guess technically Donald Trump is female.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      in their jurisdiction (Mexico) it is actually the “Gulf of Mexico” in Google Maps, they don’t get the “Gulf of America” name.

      I’m in Europe and for me it says “Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)”. 🥴

      • merc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’ve heard that in Germany it’s “Golf von Mexiko (Golf von Amerika)”. That’s really annoying. I can vaguely understand it having the parenthesized name in English. Say in 3 years some kid in England is doing a report about something in the US and the Gulf of America comes up. Maybe you’d want the kid to be able to find it on the map. But, maybe it’s fine if the kid has to look it up somewhere else, realize that’s the stupid name, then search for Gulf of Amerikkka.

        But, it doesn’t make any sense to do that for other languages. Just like we don’t get Finland (Suomi) when searching for Finland, Finns shouldn’t get something like Meksikonlahti (Gulf of America). They aren’t going to be exposed to / hearing the Finnish translation of the English name, so it’s not helpful in any way to have that parenthesized version.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I can see Google (and Apple) quietly paying a fine and changing it for Mexico (and any other jurisdiction that specifically asks).

    This is stupid and cowardly of them, but that aside, the implication is 100% “comply, or the US government will make life difficult for Google.” I can see how they’re stuck between a rock and a hard place.

    • RxBrad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      I legitimately don’t understand why the U.S. isn’t the only locality where it shows up as “Gulf of America”.

      Set the en-US string to “Gulf of America”. Leave literally every other region’s text string untouched from what it was 6 months ago.

      When the next Democrat U.S. President gets sworn in and immediately Executive Orders it back to “Gulf of Mexico”, change the en-US string back to that.

      This is all so stupid and melodramatic.

    • ggppjj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Step two of the plan you outlined was inverted by Google, but the effect is the same: IIRC it only shows up that way for US users.

      Edit: apparently that was either a lie or incomplete info, see comments elsewhere in this thread.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The new name shows only for USA. In Mexico it’s unchanged, or shown with both names.

      Our president is dumb and just wants to look like she’s fighting back without actually doing anything significant.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Showing with both names does not make it any better and I’m not sure why you think it does. They’re just kowtowing to a unilateral decision made by one of the multiple countries that border the Gulf of Mexico.

        I assume you would not want Taiwan to be called Chinese Taipei on Google Maps despite China calling it that.

        • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Woah, who said I’m fine with that? I’m Mexican and very much resent the idiocy of Trump, but our president is also an idiot who “threatens” to do something, but I can assure you she will not actually do anything.

          IMO she’s posturing to her base, but she says she might go against Google because she doesn’t dare to go against Trump, and she needs to look like she’s doing something.

          Meanwhile, we have very urgent problems in Mexico like rampant crime, medicine scarcity, corruption, etc. that she doesn’t even mention in her daily morning speeches.

    • cotlovan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Since when is the big tech the arbiter of truth? It might come as a surprise to you, but Google and Apple don’t care about your holy war against Trump.

        • cotlovan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think Google and Apple should call it whatever the official names are, not to take any sort of political stance.

            • cotlovan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              In case you have forgotten, Google is an American company, every one of their decisions is taken in California. Maybe calling everything you don’t agree “fascist” isn’t a smart idea, since it shows that you have no idea what the meaning of that word is.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                That is not what I asked.

                OK, let’s reverse it, and say Mexico renamed the Gulf to something else. What do you think Google should do, inside Mexico and out?

                • cotlovan@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Inside Mexico they should name it whatever the Mexico calls it. Outside Mexico it should be called however it is called in the respective country.

                  But again, Google is based in the US, all their decisions are made there.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            The official name is the Gulf of Mexico. It doesn’t become a different name just because Trump declares it. It isn’t up to him.

  • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Again, this is one of the dumbest fucking wastes of money I’ve ever seen. Waste of labor from the top down. Waste of resources. This is purely a pride move. It’s the gulf of Mexico and always has been. There are American songs about the gulf of Mexico. It’s history. I have said it before and I’ll say it again, I fucking hate this timeline. This shit is wild. This stuff now days is a mockery of our world.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 days ago

      Look we’re wasting our hard earned tax payer money on crazy fraudulent things like science, education, weather, feeding children, helping the poor, medicine… Dumb things like that. And you’re gonna tell me that changing the name of a body of water to include the greatest God damn country in America is a waste? Next thing you know you’re gonna stand there and tell me that poor people should be able to afford a hospital visit.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        Republicans are full of it anyway.

        Study after study has shown that a nationalized healthcare system increases a nation’s GDP in the long run. After all, people who are unable to work due to sickness or death that were caused by preventable condition, don’t pay taxes.

        For everyone else, not having to pay for private health care gives them more disposable income. Which means they spend it on other things which makes businesses more profitable.

  • Embargo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Less threatening… More doing.

    The U.S. dictatorship are just doing and they’re slowly tearing apart OUR planet.

    • cotlovan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      5 days ago

      Bro, are you ok? “US dictayorship”? Trump was elected by the majority of Americans. How is Trump destroying YOUR planet? By changing the name of the gulf? Is this the biggest problem “your” planet has?

      Fukin soypeople…

        • cotlovan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Trump said on the “day one” he referred to, he would use his presidential powers to close the southern border with Mexico

          That’s from article you linked. Maybe read the content of the articles you link to, not just the headlines.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            I read it. How does that mean he didn’t literally say he would be a dictator if elected? That was one of the examples he gave of how he would be a dictator.

            • cotlovan@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              He said “for one day, in order to secure the border with Mexico”. Let’s completely ignore that and run with the headline that supports your view, right?

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                I did the exact opposite of completely ignoring it. I literally said, “that was one of the examples he gave of how he would be a dictator.”

                Weird to accuse me of ignoring something I addressed directly. I’m not sure what you hoped to achieve.

                • cotlovan@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Dude, you are taking words out of context, you aren’t addressing anything. You read the word “dictator”, saw red in front of your eyes and ran with it.

      • Embargo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh yeah, I forgot. Implying people enjoy soy is an insult. Ouch! My feelings.

        I never said Dictayorship. Because that’s terrible spelling of the only word you needed to spell correctly to actually criticise me. I also never linked the mislabeling of the Gulf as destroying the planet. He is though…

        He proclaimed that he will “OWN” Gaza through means of literal ethnic cleansing. He’s conspiring with Putin to help finalise his invasion of eastern Ukraine. He’s currently purging the Government of minorities and people he deems unloyal. Elon Musk is infiltrating and tearing up government departments as an unelected right-hand entity. His right-wing army are, by algorithm, shifting the western world easily into fascism. I could go on but I’m done with you.

        Bottom line… pay attention.

        Also… the fact that you put forward Trump was elected by majority of Americans is a straight out lie. Grow up.

        • cotlovan@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Oh, I mistyped a word, while writing on my phone. That means I’m wrong, who did I miss that?!

          Its also funny how you say Trump “is infiltrating and tearing down government departments”. Bro, he’s the president, everything he’s doing it’s in his powers. Did the previous president also “infiltrate” the government departments?

          He’s “purging” the DEI hires, the people who are there just because of their skin color or sexual preferences, did you forget how the former white house speaker was “the first gay black woman”? That’s the only thing that recomended her.

          I’m really curious how Trump being elected by the majority of the Americans is a lie, please enlighten me.