• blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        As far as I know, the lawyers have not confirmed that it is him.

        But in any case, that’s beside the point of the “weird ass conspiracy”. To spell it out a bit more clearly, the actual idea is that there is “not enough evidence” to convict - because he should not be convicted. (In a jury trial, you cannot just say “guilty, but should be unpunished”; but you can say “not guilty, due to insufficient evidence”.)

      • starman2112
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I really don’t care what anyone says, I will not reject the evidence of my eyes and ears. The guy who did the praxis, the guy who was smiling in that security footage, and Luigi Mangione are very clearly three different people.

          • starman2112
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Are you suggesting that New York Police Department doctored the photo of that guy smiling to make him not look like Luigi???