• DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        They were never competition, exactly. NASA doesn’t make spacecraft, they buy and sometimes modify them from industrial concerns and always have.

        What they did do was be a federal space agency, with all that implies otherwise, which means a private company can’t charge premium rates to do the things that absolutely have to happen that they were doing.

        This is the privatization and militarization (through the inevitability of Space Force absorbing some responsibility) of space.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    21 hours ago

    The US is gonna be so humiliated when China lands people on the moon and we have no infrastructure or tech in place to answer their move.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We’ll be sending the first live person to Venus and it will be our greatest hero, Elon Trump! We will show China what can be done when there’s a will.

      • earphone843
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I fully support Musk and Trump landing on the surface of venus

        • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It could be a surprise! We tell them they’re just going for a quick moon landing but then a little Boeing later…uhhh ahhh! They become the first two people to land on Venus. Probably less uhh and more ahhhhh!

    • reiterationstation@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      We currently have no one meeting this head on with real leadership. Anyone with political capital to travel and speak with world leaders (as trump did when he wasn’t president) could be helping save this YET.

      • gravitas_deficiency
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        And the remainder of us who are somewhat higher on the spectrum of both sanity and giving a fuck about humans and the world are losing our fucking minds at a distressing pace

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    19 hours ago

    A Republican voter told me Trump would be thrown out of office if America loses the space race to China. Whenever I need a half-correct monkey paw fortuneteller, I guess I know where to find one.

  • Tony Bark@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    So, is SpaceX just going to do all the infrastructure? Because this is just royally dumb.

    • xmunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Yup, and they’ll do it half as well for three times the cost.

      Efficiency!

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This deeply pisses me off. You have no idea how excited I am to go back to the moon and if that goes down the drain imma lose it.

    • gravitas_deficiency
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They are absolutely gonna kill the Artemis project. They already killed the launch vehicle (though, to be fair, SLS was an absolute albatross).

  • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m super worried about JWST… It’s been absolutely amazing so far, and that fucker might just fucking axe it.

    • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      JWST is fine. It’s not going anywhere, and unless it is purposefully destroyed it will keep sending us data.

      The NASA Deep Space Network collects it and distributes it, but Europe could just as easily set up their own interface to receive the data. DSN was already in place, so it made sense to keep using it.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        21 hours ago

        2 out of the 3 DSN locations aren’t even in the US or managed by NASA.

        • NASA manages the Goldstone complex in California
        • The Madrid complex is in Spain and managed by their national space agency
        • The Canberra complex is in Australia and managed by their national space agency

        Also, fun fact, the Canberra complex has the only antenna that can communicate with Voyager 2!

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I mean, it’s already up there and there’s no docking port for future service missions.

      A lot of countries contributed to JWST, if the US drops it, someone else will pay people to keep it in orbit.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    From the article …

    NASA announced on Monday that it will be closing the Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy; the Office of the Chief Scientist; and the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) Branch of the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Twenty-three employees will be affected by the cuts,

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Oh! Oh! Can Canada get its aerospace engineers and industry back? We’ve been missing them ever since the Avro Arrow project got cancelled by American pressure and they all ended up in NASA.

    • Moose@moose.best
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I would fucking love that. I find it unlikely but I really want to work in space manufacturing without moving to the USA. I know there are a handful of companies here, but not enough.

  • ApeNo1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “It’s one small step backwards for man, it’s”, scans notes looking for last section of speech. Shrugs. “I think that’s it folks. One small step backwards it is.”

  • AnIndefiniteArticle
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Science Mission Directorate cut by 50%?

    It’s not the people building the rockets getting cut the most.

    It’s the people studying the planets and responsible for understanding and protecting their state before human development s’encubre.

    • seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yes and it covers way more missions than most people would think, like the Mars rovers, all of our sample return efforts, etc. It would all but kill US planetary science.

      • AnIndefiniteArticle
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Changing our space program from that of scientific exploration and understanding our neighbors to one of colonization and conquest.