• Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’d agree some semblance of left unity would be valuable if tankies actually had left leanings other than saying they support lgbtq. they don’t even actually support lgbtq because they constantly deny any allegations of their favorite authoritarians having any ill intentions towards the group. also they are adamant that china is doing nothing bad to Uyghurs, and that Russia is fully in the right invading Ukraine. Tankies are fucking dumb

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My favorite is when tankies don’t have any other enemies, and you can watch them tear each other apart over whether LGBT people are people, or whether their ‘comrades’ in the developing world are right about Western degeneracy destroying their good, cis-straight cultures.

      It’s astounding to watch so many LGBT tankies sudden realize they would get the bullet in an instant, and immediately do nothing with that information.

      • Silverseren@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really don’t understand why so many trans individuals state their alliance with tankies, when any government tankies support are totally fine with murdering them.

        They’re okay with ragging on the US’ problems against the LGBT+ community (and there are many such problems to rag on), but conveniently ignore things like gay and trans people being killed in droves in Chechnya.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Might be that the total subsumption of all issues to class means that LGBT people can feel more welcomed in tankie communities as individuals because tankie communities don’t regard the issue as of importance. Rather than feeling the sting of rejection in right-wing communities (and there are a terrifying number of right-wing LGBT folk) or the strong emphasis on LGBT community and culture in many left-leaning communities that may leave some feeling ‘out of the loop’ and depersonalized, even if that’s not the general feeling or the intent.

          Alternatively, LGBT people are just people, and people are often dumb. Whichever.

      • Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        seems it’s hard to stop having jello instead of a brain when you already have jello instead of a brain

    • goatM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      May you remove your final sentence about the lives? It’s against site-wide rules

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re communist, thats what makes them left wing.

      Yall are so quick to say anything bad is right wing, it turns into denial.

      • Wet Noodle@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        they call themselves communist because they align with ‘communist’ authoritarian regimes. that doesn’t make them left wing. at most they could be knocked to centrist for being socially leftish while politically authoritarian right

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m of the opinion that left/right has become strongly economic in its connotations, and therefore, tankies, as anti-capitalists, are still strongly left. Just, y’know, being stupid about it.

          • Klear
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m of the opinion that left/right has become strongly economic in its connotations

            Always have been. It’s just mushed together with other axes due two USA’s two-party system which makes politics seem one dimensional.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not always. The original left/right dichotomy was from the French Revolution, after all, where the main point of contention was political power, not economic power.

          • Throwaway@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly, this whole “what team are you really on?” discourse is kinda annoying.

            Like, can anyone properly define left, center, and right?

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but you’d have to accept that it’s all relative. A left-wing position in Saudi Arabia is not necessarily a left-wing position in the USA.

              Left/Right originated as change vs. conservatism, but with the rise of the revolutionary right-wing (fascists) and ideological reactionaries, it has morphed to generally mean Anti-Hierarchy vs. Hierarchy.

              Most prominent in this is in economics - those who are ideologically left support systems which, in theory, do not lend hierarchical power to any given individual or class. Those who are ideologically right support systems which unambiguously do. As such, ideologies which aim to reduce economic hierarchy - from Social Democracy seeking to lessen the coercive aspects of capitalist wealth, to Marxist-Leninists asserting that state socialism totally is above board and not a vanguardist power play, to full-on-ancoms seeking a society from each according to their ability, to each according to their need - are left. Ideologies which seek to preserve or increase economic hierarchy - neolibs at its most mild, ancaps, fascists, and corporatocrats at its most severe - are right.

              • Silverseren@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s just f’ed up that economically left and economically right nation-states are in joint agreement of wanting all of us in the LGBT+ community to die.

              • Throwaway@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I agree that its realitive, but tbh it kinda seems like you took “Left is inherently good, right is inherently bad” and then defined around it. Communism (or more specifically, Stalin) is slavery to the state, and thats definitely a heirarchy and definitely left wing.

                • PugJesus@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mentioned that Marxist-Leninists (‘Communists’ in common parlance) are ideologically left, even though in practice their system is dogshit.

                • 31337
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There is no state in communism.

                  • Throwaway@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Except every time we tried communism, there was a state. And don’t “Not trye communism” me, its communism as practiced.