• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    tbf, the political compass test is ancient and was never great to begin with. You have to almost try to get a certain result.

    • yata
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That particular compass (and unfortunately the only one ever used on the internet) was designed by right wing libertarians to reflect their ideas in a postive light and all others in a negative light. The terms chosen for the axes are vague and ambigous, and the combination of precisely those terms in that manner very unorthodox.

      It is completely useless for any actual identification of political beliefs, and is not used by any political scientists. It is unsurprising that tankies test the way they do, because it was precisely designed to lure people who are largely ignorant of political science into libertarianism.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That particular compass (and unfortunately the only one ever used on the internet)

        I wish making an axis-oriented test like that was easier, I’d make such a great political horoscope

        • fsxylo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not using Science flavored horoscopes.

          • Ajen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think they had a valid question. Do you think a one-dimensional left/right scale is better than the 2 dimensional political compass? Is there a better method of classifying political beliefs for those of us who don’t have degrees in political science?

            • Throwaway@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Personally, more axes the better, but that calls into question,are we playing teams, or are we trying to do actual science?

        • whataboutshutup@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe there shouldn’t be a scheme simplifying a complex matter to two axes, coupled with these short questionnaires? Or it shouldn’t be taken seriously at all? PCM is a Harry Potter houses test for political fandoms on the internet, it has it’s niche, but neither it, nor other models bring something meaningful to the table for it is by design a gross oversimplification.