A special prosecutor will not charge the six Georgia State Patrol troopers who shot and killed an environmental protestor at the proposed site for the controversial Atlanta Public Safety Training Center.

Manuel Esteban Paez Terán, who went by “Tortuguita” and used they/them pronouns, was shot and killed by six Georgia State Troopers on Jan. 18 as officers raided campgrounds occupied by environmental demonstrators who had allegedly been camping out for months to protest the development of the training center, dubbed “Cop City” by critics.

After months of investigating, the Stone Mountain Circuit District Attorney’s Office says the troopers’ use of lethal force was “objectively reasonable under the circumstances of the case.”

  • PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    After months of investigating, the Stone Mountain Circuit District Attorney’s Office says the troopers’ use of lethal force was “objectively reasonable under the circumstances of the case.”

    In their report, officials say the troopers spoke with Tortuguita, who refused to leave and zipped up the tent in which they were living.

    After an officer fired pepper balls at the tents, officials say that the environmental activist fired multiple shots - hitting Georgia State Patrol Trooper Jerry Parrish below his armor plate and above his belt on his right side and lodging the bullet in his spine. The troopers then returned fire, hitting and killing Tortuguita.

    For once, I think the cops may be telling the truth. Getting a bullet in one’s spine might be a bit much for a cover story.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          From that same link, unless you think the Georgia Bureau of Investigation is lying as well:

          and that ballistics evidence shows the bullet that injured the trooper came from a gun belonging to Tortuguita.

          • winterayars
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not to be, like, irrationally stubborn or whatever but that is consistent with a cop taking the gun while the perp’s hands are up, gun discharges, everyone fires.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        The most likely scenario is the police threatened him with violence, and they started shooting pepper balls at the tent he thought they were shooting bullets and he returned fire.

    • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The victim was on his knees with his hands up when shot multiple times. There were exit wounds on his hands and arms that would have only been there if his arms were up.

      The cops probably surrounded him then shot eachother, then to cover it up they shot someone afterwards with a gun found on the victim.

      • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cops will stick together, but I don’t think it extends to “shooting each other multiple times and possibly paralyzing a fellow officer”.

        • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You have two people to possibly blame for a friendly fire accident, a fellow officer who could get fired or maybe sent to jail, your other choice is the guy you just shot 56 times.

          Who do you blame in that instance if you are a cop?

    • catfish@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      He doesn’t look the I’m carrying and will shoot some pigs if provoked part, just my assumption tho

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those who knew him claimed he had committed to nonviolence.

        Although apparently the ballistics report claims the bullet came from a gun Terán owned.

        I’m inclined to believe the cops used excessive force since that’s what they’re regularly trained to do.

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          How are you committed to nonviolence, but buy a gun and bring it to a protest? That doesn’t mean he was looking to fight or that he didn’t prefer nonviolent resistance, but it’s pretty incompatible with a commitment to nonviolence.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for that. The above excerpt made it seem like he was an unarmed activist. Dude shot at the cops, WTF did he think was going to happen?

      • kandoh@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve heard on twitter from people who’ve been following this that the bullet came from another cop’s gun.

        • Spedwell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is one theory, based on a conversation captured on another (not-directly-involved, but on-site) office’s bodycam footage. It isn’t really conclusive, it’s on-scene hearsay from what is likely the downstream end of a game of telephone.

          The more productive avenue for discussions, in my opinion, is to consider whether firing pepper balls at non-violent individuals is perhaps negligent or reckless use of force, that escalates the situation without solving anything.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Instantly and uncritically believing the word of a cop is a great way to justify murder.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except he didn’t shoot at them, as evidenced by the lack of any GSR during the autopsy.

        Most likely scenario at this point is blue on blue i.e. another cop fired their gun, and this cop let loose on an unarmed activist who was, at time of death, had his hands up.

        • GONADS125@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          No way it was a single cop executing him, with both hands and arms sustaining multiple gunshot wounds. That was a straight up firing squad execution…