• ste_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait until you discover what system they used for the Apollo missions

      • maryjayjay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        1 year ago

        Internal calculations were are all done in metric, but converted to traditional US units because many of the astronauts were pilots and more used to them

        • Vilian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          imperial system is based on metric(on wikipedia) so they calculed on metric, converted to imperial, that is basically metric but worse

          • Pipoca@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Kinda sorta not really.

            One problem with units is defining them precisely.

            For example, a meter is ostensibly “one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole along a great circle”. That’s not exactly precisely defined because the earth isn’t a perfect sphere.

            So currently, a meter is defined to be the distance light travels in a vacuum in 9192631770 / 299,792,458 hyperfine structure transitions of caesium-133.

            Rather than doing the same sort of thing with updating the standard definition of a foot or pound, the US just piggybacked off the work precisely defining metric units and defined imperial in terms of metric.

            So now a foot is officially the precise distance light travels in some number of hyperfine structure transitions of caesium-133, and the US government didn’t need to do a thing.

            • Peppycito
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              If only they made a meter equal a yard. I’m okay with a bigger yard.

        • lugal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not helpful. We all know what the apollo program was but where in the article does it talk about the system of measurement?

  • funkless_eck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    quick! the Imperial system is under attack. Only you can save it. Tell me, how many barleycorns in a chain?

  • saltnotsugar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone once told me it was 20 degrees Celsius out. I didn’t know if it was snowing, blazing, or if he was moving at 50 furlongs a minute.

    • zefiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is exactly how I feel when my American colleagues discuss the weather in Fahrenheit.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        0: Fuck, it’s cold out there!

        100: Fuck, it’s hot out there!

        If you go somewhere outside this range - leave.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fahrenheit is, surprisingly, somewhat intuitive in the very specific case of weather.

        Not that it never goes beyond the extremes of the scale, but very broadly speaking, 0-100 F is your weather range, with 0F being cold as balls and 100F being hot as balls.

        The balls scale of weather temperature is significantly less intuitive.

    • joneskind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Celsius

      • 0° : freezing water
      • 100° : boiling water

      Farenheit

      • 100° : I love you darling
      • 0° : We’re all gonna die

      Both

      • 50°C and 50°F : Not a good temperature for a bath
    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not being used to F at all, it seems to me that C has at least least some very notable landmarks - 0 frozen, 100 boiling. I have zero landmarks for F

      • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are people in the US who will fight tooth and nail to defend the imperial system, as if it’s superior in some way. It just doesn’t make sense to me. It’s harder to learn, completely inconsistent, and unlike standard metric, there is no scientific basis for the measurements. They’re just random distances that someone made up.

        Tell me, what’s easier to remember? 0°C or 32°F? 100°C or 212°F? 1000m = 1km or 5280ft = 1mi

        • StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s actually kinda weird that they use dollars and cents and not pounds, shillings, pennies and farthings, because that feels much more compatible with the imperial way of thinking.

          • Rambi@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re right actually, when you think about it $1 being 100 cents is basically communism. $1 should be 57.93 cents

            • StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think even using decimals like that seems un-American, because I’ve always been told that fractions are what makes imperial so easy. Everyone loves calculating fractions after all, so perhaps a cent should be 1/37th of a dollar.

        • Pipoca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imperial basically developed by picking a useful measure at each given scale.

          For example, a mile was originally 1000 paces, and wasn’t standardized at all. The first Roman legion to march down a road would stick mile markers down based on the length of their stride.

          A furlong was one agricultural furrow long - the distance you’d plow with your Ox.

          A foot was originally someone’s literal foot.

          It’s inconsistent for the same reason a meter doesn’t go neatly into a light year. That doesn’t make it good, but it’s a very human system of units.

        • ricecake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          At the very least get the history right. Fahrenheit was defined so that a temperature stable brine solutions temperature was zero, because it was easy to create for calibration, and that the freezing and boiling points of water would be 180° apart, because circles and temperature gauges have a natural link.

          Redefinition of the scale to make it line up with metric has led to some minor drift in the definition.

          The good criticism of fahrenheit is that it’s non standard, not that it doesn’t have round numbers for two states of one substance.

      • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of all the parts of the imperial measurements, temperature is the one I’d keep, at least for weather measures. It’s a human centric scale rather than scientific, so 0 is cold, 100 is hot, but both are survivable with the right cloths and an accommodating environment. If you get outside of those it starts to get particularly hazardous in either direction though and even near the ends it’s ‘take some heavy precautions’ territory.

        • Deme@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see what you mean, but the freezing point of water is arguably the most critical temperature when it comes to weather. Celsius is easy in this regard.

          +3°C? => Precipitation will almost certainly be liquid.

          -3°C? => Precipitation will be mostly solid and any possible rain or drizzle will be supercooled, forming a sheet of ice on whatever it lands on. Look out for slippery roads!

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s also useful that a moderate climate on average won’t go much higher than 100 in the summer, or lower than 0 in the winter. So you know if it does then either that day is an outlier, or you don’t live in a moderate climate. So it makes that information just a bit more intuitive. Speaking as a Michigander at least, that’s what those numbers mean to me.

          • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I hope that holds true, given we just had the twin cities marathon canceled for excessive heat in October, in MN where we still mention the Halloween blizzard of 94 in hushed tones, that scale might need recalibration.

            • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah it’s definitely drifted a bit since Fahrenheit was first conceived what with climate change and all. That doesn’t mean the scale is wrong, it means the moderate climates are slowly moving elsewhere.

              • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe we just discovered an instant solution to global warming, just readjust the temp scale. Move everything up by a couple dozen degrees and suddenly we’re in a new ice age. 🤔

  • coco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Im stuck with in Canada.

    So frustating that american carmake gone to metric