• Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe. Critical government services running COBOL. Programs stored in magnetic tapes, entire offices dependant on one guy who’s retiring. All that code will be lost in time, like tears in rain

    • TheLameSauce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is genuine money to be made in learning the “dead languages” of the IT world. If you’re the only person within 500 Miles that knows how to maintain COBOL you can basically name your price when it comes to salary.

      I just wish I had the slightest interest in programing

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seriously looked into picking one of these dead languages up and honestly, it’s not worth it.

        Biggest issue is, you have to be experienced to some degree before you get the name your price levels. So you’ll have to take regular ol average programmer pay (at best) for a language that’s a nightmare in 2023. Your sanity is at heavy risk.

        I’d honestly rather bash my head with assembly, it’s still very much in use these days in a modern way. Most programs still get compiled into it anyway (Albeit to a far more complicated instruction set than in the past) and can still land some well paid positions for not a whole lot of experience (relatively)

        • Technus@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah everytime someone says “just learn COBOL, you’ll make tons of money,” it’s like,

          Bro.

          There’s a reason no one wants to write new software in these languages anymore, let alone maintain a forty-year-old pile of technical debt.

        • SamirCasino@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Been working in COBOL for a decade and this is all true.

          I’m lucky. I personally enjoy it. But i can totally see how it’s an absolute nightmare for most people.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been meaning to learn Fortran in part because because of the whole “big bucks for being willing to maintain old software” thing, but mostly because I’d like to work on the sorts of scientific computing software that was (and still often is) written in Fortran.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          COBOL isn’t too terrible, it has its gotchas (like sizing variables for inputs (in which you don’t need space for the datas headers and will break stuff if you do)) but mostly it’s an old language designed to be easy to use

          New staff in my workplace first using COBOL (with other build experience) learn it to the point they’re productive in a week or two

        • kucing@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah man I’ll take plain old php and java any time of day, I can still get enough money from it to pay my lifestyle. And at 5pm I can close my laptop and play vidya with no worries.

    • Treczoks@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just have a look at the American pension system. They collect all their documents on paper in an old salt mine. Truckloads of documents per month.

    • mayoi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Magnetic tapes aren’t that surprising, it’s just even more cost effective storage than HDD.

  • morrowind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    1 year ago

    Highly agree with the first point, companies should not be able to hold exclusive rights to any product they no longer provide support for.

    Abandonware and unsold products are one of the few cases in which I consider piracy ethical

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      piracy isn’t theft, but how do you feel about “stealing” from a thief? in the case of corporate software, the company already stole the surplus value created by their developers’ labor.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Publishers and film makers too. Keep it in print or lose rights (though I’d rather have much shorter copyright periods). Changed products get their own copyright, but the old version falls out if you stop selling it.

  • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Originally copyright was like 15 years and if the thing was really good for you then you could Apply for a second 15 year term.

    30 years is a long time to get a monopoly over something. As a human being, 30 years is a significant part of your entire lifetime. From birth to 30 years you have your entire childhood, many people go to and finish college, get married, have kids, achieve a degree of professional success. Another 30 years from that moment, many people are at the end of their lives. They’re retiring, some who smoked or did other things are dying of old people diseases.

    I believe strongly enough that 15 years is a reasonable copyright term that my book, the graysonian ethic, which I published in 2021, has a note on the legal page releasing it to the public domain 15 years from the first date of publishing, and in jurisdictions where you can’t do that, it’s licensed under the creative Commons zero license

    If I want to own the rights to another book, I can write another book. If I can’t make back the money that I spent writing and publishing it in 15 years, then that’s a me problem, not a society problem the police can help enforce.

    The famous song Happy Birthday left copyright only a couple years ago, and not because it timed out. The song which was written in the era of my great grandparents only lost protection from the largest state in history because after a hundred years no one could keep track of who owned it anymore.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      From birth to 30 years you have your entire childhood, many people go to and finish college, get married, have kids, achieve a degree of professional success. Another 30 years from that moment, many people are at the end of their lives

      Oh, don’t hurt me like that, please…

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, the only silver lining of Ron DeSantis’s feud with Disney over anti-gay legislation is that the Republicans might end up undoing all the copyright extensions Disney lobbied for over the past few decades.

      Disney is largely to blame for America’s copyright laws being so fucked.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, the less special treatment any one corporation gets, or the less special treatment corporations as a whole get, that’s a win for everyone else in society.

        Most people on both sides of the aisle if you stepped away from the specific political situation would agree that companies should not be allowed to form their own municipal governments, either.

    • Caboose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think part of the problem is that it is very dependent on what the invention is. Yeah, for some nicknack, that’s a reasonable time frame. But for some kind of massive project, where distribution, complicated supply chains, and many people are involved, this time gets eaten up quick. Imagine you have an invention, thats totally cool, but 10 years of your time is taken up trying to make it at scale to make it profitable? Meanwhile, someone else can establish all those things without breaking patent, and go to market as your patent closes. You aren’t wrong, its just not always so simple.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Copyright isn’t patents. I think patents are presently 20 years, nowhere near the lifetime + 70 years of copyrights.

  • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    This happens in the world of CNC machines too. I used to run a two million dollar Mazak 300 Fabrigear that was made in 2008. When I started the machine up, Windows 98 booted up before starting the FANUC control program that actually ran the machine.

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      My friend’s dad has a CNC machine that requires floppy disks to load the design patterns. He’s worried that a mechanical failure of the disk drive will eventually be the end of it, rather than the machine itself being obsolete. It’s been going strong for almost 40 years now.

      • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Look for usb floppy emulators, you can have the floppy images in a usb flash drive. No moving parts or need to find expensive floppies.

          • renormalizer@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s reverse: you get a board that has a floppy interface on one side and a USB socket on the other. You plug in a USB drive and the board uses a file on the drive as the floppy disk, pretending to be a floppy Drive connected to the interface. It’s a little less convenient because you have to deal with disk images but it works without moving parts.

      • pyt0xic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It might be possible to buy an old floppy drive off ebay and switch out the broken one of that happens, as long as there are no proprietary connectors and such…

          • bufordt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, Compaq, the company that used non standard power supplies but with the standard wire coloring and connectors. I had several customers blow up their motherboards after buying standard replacement power supplies.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as it’s not connected to a network and is actually maintained, there’s nothing specifically wrong with Windows 98. Also just make sure the USB ports are shut.

    • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s amazing even for the cheaper CnC machines in other industries running on Dos or Win95, 98, XP. I use to have to maintain the hardware of these older PCs as the initial outlay to replace the machines was fairly high compared to stress and much lower cost of finding old hardware.

      In the end with the modem equivalent CnC machines on the lower end we would only see minimal upgrades to the functions of the machines, versus the updates to the software. Let’s me honest that would become obsolete yet again within a few years.

      It’s the circle of life?

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My work used to use (until a project I worked on* to bypass it) a document formatter that lived in a set of chips on an ISA card

      ISA slots went rare with Pentium 1/586; were extinct not much later

      We had a beige box and a backup beige box. When parts failed the replacements were incredibly expensive (enough it was worth 12*60 pdays of fixing)

      (* On resumes, I was totally critical to that project; in reality it was build led, and I was in design)

  • noodle@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Games publishers are in a war of attention and don’t want to compete with themselves. They won’t sell you an old game if they can get you hooked on the new version with microtransactions and DLC with no story and sub-par multiplayer.

    The next point is just making the case for open source.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some companies just make their new version compelling. You can’t get the experience of Balders Gate 3 by playing Balders Gate 1.

      I think they’re all competing with themselves anyway, the biggest customer group for Whatever 5 will be players of Whatever 4. Giving away Whatever 1, 2, and 3 will increase sales of 4 and 5

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree, although the number of pointless updates that would be pushed so that companies can keep the rights to their software makes me cringe

    • BambiDiego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Capitalism will always capitalism. “Oh, we have to provide a healthy option? Okay, it’ll be the expensive option.” “Oh, we have to support software? Okay, subscription models only” “Oh, we have to pay our workers minimum wage? Okay, we’ll pay them not a penny more and raise our prices”

      It’s an endless fight… Yet, we can’t stop fighting it, because attrition of our values and apathy in our actions are weapons the system uses against us.

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even books have the same. IIRC the ‘corrected’ version of Bilbo receiving the ring came into the Hobbit because the publisher wanted Tolkien to make a revised version to keep the copyright going.

        (I presume the corrected version of that chapter was just taking advantage of the opportunity, but still…)

    • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was so hard for me to grasp at some point over a decade earlier that in the past, in the middle ages and earlier for example, that people would publish all these educational books…and none of the info was copyrighted; literally anyone could find some book published by some random Greek or Arab person and just take all the knowledge, and release their own stuff that just freely builds on the knowledge contained within, or that inventions could be copied by anyone and no one was like ‘pay me for my brilliance’.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely. Free flow of information without pay wall allows humanity to collectively build upon itself.

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          At the same time, paying people who generate, develop and curate information, enables and encourages more people to do so. IMHO one of the amazing things about the open source movement is it’s built on so much generosity of time and resources.

        • Astaroth@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Could your average joe even afford to buy a single one of those handwritten books? Or even read said book for that matter…

      • jadero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, but it’s important to remember that a much (most?) of that work was performed by those with hereditary wealth, under the patronage of those with hereditary wealth, under the patronage of the church, or by clergy who had plenty of free time beyond their duties and no separate need to earn income for housing and food. In fact, one reason to enter the clergy was to gain access to the resources to pursue other activities.

    • Wilzax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Property other than what you personally use to live shouldn’t exist, but if we’re moving away from capitalism, IP is not first on the list of things to abandon

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, I could see some forms of IP being higher on the list than others. A market socialist setup, where every company is a worker owned co-op, would still have a lot of use for Trademarks. It could be a far less abusive system than the one we have now, but we’d still want it to exist.

        Market socialism itself is likely to only be a transitory step, though.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A monopoly is thought to inspire creation, if that’s so IP is good, but should be on human timescales.

      100 years of monopoly won’t inspire me any better than 20 years, and even most cooperate products have less time in production than that

  • pyt0xic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work for a company who’s main source of income is a suite of accounting, stock and job management applications, all of which are written in FoxPro. The community add-ons and support is incredible but there hasn’t been any official support since like 2009.

    Microsoft bought the license for FoxPro, supported it for a few years then killed it off when VB came out. I wonder why xD

    The crazy part is some of our clients are turning over 100s of millions in profit a year, using this crappy, mess of a system written in a dead language, by one dude 😂

  • DpZer0126@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    This post is so true. I work in local government in a state that has TONS of money, yet our systems to control the information for agents to determine if you keep your kids or not is still based on MS-DOS. it’s insane to see in 2023

      • Saizaku@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using something like DOS is neither preferred nor more safe. Last time MS DOS received a security patch was 23 years ago. It’s open to pretty much any security vulnerability you can think of. In case you depend on a DOS app it’s preferable to run it on a modern OS that is DOS compatible, windows 10 32bit for example (I believe Win11 still has support). Or even better sandboxed in an emulator like DOSBox on a more secure OS.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really don’t want to rely on security through obscurity… MS-DOS was written back when every programmer trusted everything that ran on the computer, security wasn’t even an afterthought, and encryption was the sole domain of math nerds, conspiracy theorists, and the nerd equivalent of doomsday preppers because it was “too computationally expensive.” Its sole saving grace in terms of security is that it doesn’t support multitasking so malware can’t run in the background, but you can just target whatever software it’s running, instead.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kinda related, in the company I used to work everything was done in SAS, an statistical analysis software (SAS duh) that fucking sucks. It’s used to be great, but once your on their environment you are trapped for fucking forever. I hated it and refuse to learned it over what was basic for my daily tasks. A couple of months I moved to another company that used to pay a consulting firm for my job, so my boss and me had to start everything fresh and the first thing we did was to study what are going to use as statistics software and I fight tooth and nails for Python and one of the points I pushed was that if in the future we decide to move out of Python we could easily can do it, while other solutions could locked up us with them.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you rely on free packages in Python for processing, those are as likely to become obsolete as anything else (if not more likely). I also really dislike the compatibility issues with different versions of different packages, the whole environment aspect. Buying new computer with different version of windows? Who knows what will work there.

      In this sense for scientific computation I prefer something like MATLAB. Code written 40 years ago, most likely would still work. New computer? No problem, no configuration, just install Matlab, and it runs! Yes, it costs money, but you get what you paid for. Mathematica is another option, but I mean ugh!

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mostly use pandas that I don’t think is going anywhere, we’re also going to start tests with a library called ‘chainladder’ that is used for some actuarial reserves calculations, from everything else I’m programming custom functions because as far as I know, there’s not a lot of actuarial mathematics libraries on Python (R have much more support for that, but I prefer the flexibility of Python, like a good portion of my job is scrapping our regulatory body website for information and not sure how good R work on that).

      • zaphod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Matlab is ugly because it’s so backwards compatible. And it only is backwards compatible until someone decides to use it to interface with external hardware that you need a specific version of some library for.

      • alkheemist@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you really don’t want to spend money, there’s always GNU Octave. Sure, it doesn’t have the thousands of matlab toolboxes, but if you’re running code from 40 years ago it shouldn’t need those anyway. I wrote a couple of scripts recently and then rewrote them slightly so that they would be compatible with octave.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Intellectual property rights. They even wanted to extend it recently so they can milk old stuff.

    • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps it could be like copyrights and patents? If you don’t defend them, you lose them, and in some cases they expire after a set amount of time and then they can be used by others

  • AMillionNames
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    COBOL is still used heavily in banking, it would be the ultimate abandonware if it wasn’t still getting supported.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s still supported because there’s billions of dollars moved by COBOL code and IBM and others want a share of the profit of those who move billions

      • AMillionNames
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but look at the documentation for IBM platforms and compare it to legacy documentation from Microsoft. People keep using it and part of it is because it has a lower maintenance cost than the short term costs of moving on. It’s not trust that exists in a vacuum, Microsoft has tried to sell too hard being a Microsoft developer using their Microsoft tools to ever have that legacy demand, companies will just use *nix instead.

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    God, back when I was a kid my father used to be against me playing video games so I’d have to find some free way to game and I just lived on abandonware games. I downloaded games that were either kind of old and came out around the mid-90’s or even earlier, or had just been abandoned; that and a ton of gaming on emulators.

    So many fun old games, sooooo many fun old games. Also lots and lots of ASCII rpg games, lots and lots of ASCII rpg games.