• fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Celebrating the birth of Jesus and the gift of life through procreation. And the dude was banging his wife so totally wholesome.

      The only victim here is that poor bowl of guacamole.

      • bufordt
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party I’m gonna stick my dick in the mashed avocados.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? The last year I worked as a hospital housekeeper, they cancelled our staff Christmas party due to budget cuts. Of course the surgeons and hospital board all got their extravagant parties funded, but us cleaners got shit on and our shitty party taken away.

      It was actually the reason I left the hospital industry. I heard years of “you guys are heroes!” During the pandemic, only to have us fucked out of our party

  • slowd0wn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    Her manager and one of the other co-workers participating in the group sex act were vomiting, she said in her lawsuit. While one vomited in the trash, the other threw up right in her guacamole bowl, she alleged.

    Probably the best paragraph in the whole article.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    She then walked back in to allegedly find a co-worker “having sex with his wife in front of everyone at the party”.

    Wow, the bar for group sex has really fallen. Back in my day you had to have at least three people (and no, kissing doesn’t count as a sex act).

  • Dimok@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Eh, not really sure what she is suing taco bell for. They fired the people involved, who then harassed her (but they’re fired so…). Some of the people she still worked with were pissy that she narced, so they then harassed her. Taco bell then offered to move her to another location. Sounds to me like taco bell did what they could for her…

      • Dimok@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I said that… Those would be the people she still worked with that were pissy she narced… Taco bells job is to provide a safe work environment, which they did by offering to move her to another location to combat this.

          • Dimok@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s not strategy bud, that’s American workplace law. Not sure what you do in your country, but here when there are claims of harassment, you provide a safe work environment. Obviously since claims of harassment are hard to substantiate unless there are eye witnesses or video evidence, moving them to a location they couldn’t be harassed was the best idea. Not sure how you equate whatever you are trudging up with the Catholics to this workplace issue. Sounds a bit idiotic to me but…whatever.

              • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                No. Terminating the harasser is the proper thing to do. And contact local law enforcement if there was any criminal conduct.

                Moving the harasser means they’ll continue their actions somewhere else.

                • Dimok@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is indeed the correct thing to do, if the harassment can be verified or is at a level that merits such termination. I once was involved in a disciplinary case where a group of unionized employees claimed one employee was harassing them by having a bad odor every day. They put to their steward that this was a hostile work environment. I documented several times where I personally talked to the employee, never smelt a thing. Should I have fired or moved that employee? A lot of people here make quite a few assumptions on the extremely limited info provided…

              • Dimok@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Umm, no. Someone being forced to move to a different location based on accusations is about as silly as firing them over accusations. They can and will file a complaint with the state labor board. Have any of you actually worked before…?

                • zaph
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Someone being forced to move to a different location based on accusations is about as silly as firing them over accusations

                  But you were perfectly fine moving the victim??

              • zaph
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah yes, the catholic priest strategy.

                • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Vastly different because the harassers were co-workers, not bosses like priests essentially are.

          • Ech@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            How is moving the victim even remotely the same as that?

            • zaph
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because you left the problem in a position to do the bad thing to someone else. It’s not rocket surgery.

              • Ech@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                How so? I doubt the employees are going to be shitty to a new hire that didn’t “rat” on anyone.

                Bad work relationships exist everywhere and one valid solution is to split the offending parties up. That’s not “leaving the problem” as is, it’s an active attempt to address the problems at hand.

                • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If they’re shitty to a person that reported something like this then they’re shitty people who will be shitty to everyone. Fire the lot, start that Taco Bell over. Pull the franchise from the owner over it and sell it to someone else as well

                • zaph
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I guess it is rocket surgery. Harassment isn’t a “bad work relationship,” it’s a crime. If you and I worked together and I broke a window on your car and instead of me getting fired and/or arrested, you get moved to another branch, you cannot tell me you wouldn’t feel cheated at the very least.

    • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is anyone bringing guacamole to a place full of it? Nice that they could add their own special sauce.

      The few times I’ve pop into a taco bell had left me thinking this is the last place I want to eat let alone bang and that’s before the food came.

  • Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Bechiom reported that more was in store for her after she ran out of the restaurant but came back in to fetch her guacamole bowl.”

    Best part of the story

  • Downcount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In Taco Bell’s wild rendezvous,

    A group gathered, quite a to-do.

    With a twist of fate,

    And a guacamole plate,

    I tossed up a spicy brew.

  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    While of course this behavior is inappropriate, that Taco Bell sounds fucking awesome to work at.