• His disclosures, both from his final year in Congress and his time as Minnesota governor, also show no mutual funds, bonds, private equities, or other securities.
  • No book deals or speaking fees or crypto or racehorse interests.
  • Not even real estate. The couple sold their Mankato, Minnesota, home after moving into the governor’s mansion, for below the $315k asking price).
  • jwiggler
    link
    English
    2021 month ago

    That’s insane.

    Like, no 401k or Roth IRA? Dang. I’m fuckin hard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2191 month ago

      Their only investment assets appear to be via state pensions, including teacher pensions.

      He also retired from the Army, and likely has a pension from that too.

    • stinerman [Ohio]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      591 month ago

      I’m shocked he doesn’t have an IRA (unless that doesn’t count). Given his previous jobs, it passes the smell test that he doesn’t have a 401k.

      I’m sure his pensions are invested in a wide range of stocks and bonds, but he doesn’t directly hold them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        681 month ago

        And pension funds are generally invested broadly enough that the only way a politician could “game” them is to just improve the economy as a whole. Which is like, one of the main things people want their elected officials to do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        221 month ago

        Military/feds have TSP, it’s essentially a 401k.

        If he was 20+ years military reserve he’s got a lot in there. I think he started in 1981 tho. And I’m not 100% sure how long tsp has been happening

        • @marine_mustang
          link
          9
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          He was in the Army National Guard, so would have received those benefits when activated, which he was for short periods aside from normal training requirements, but wouldn’t have as much as you’d think since he only was paid when training or activated. Also, contributions for uniformed service members began in 2001. Also also, it’s optional.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 month ago

          Introduced in the late 90’s if I recall correctly. He should the the older pension that guaranteed income.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      521 month ago

      Not having retirement savings of some kind would be…not great.

      But as someone else said, if he has military pension, that may be good enough.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 month ago

      He did 20 some years in the reserves or guard.

      That means he has tsp money, it’s the government 401k essentially.

      I mean, he might not, but it’s incredibly rare not to have tsp especially after 20+ years of service.

    • @kboy101222
      link
      English
      191 month ago

      He’s just like us 🥺

    • krellor
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      These disclosures are usually intended to address conflicts of interest and often exempt disclosing mortgages on your primary residence, market index funds, certain types of pensions, etc.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      His teacher’s pension realistically is invested in something, but he has zero control over it. He just gets what he’s owed