• gravitas_deficiency
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yes, obviously, putting explosives and projectile propellants in an armored vehicle is dangerous and should be avoided

    /s

    OSHA is not a credible military threat

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Right, but you are going to want to choose a fuel that has the least chance of flaming up if you’re making a military vehicle.

      Hydrogen has (compared to petroleum) a Wider Flammability Range, Lower Ignition Energy (0.02 millijoules) which is really low and much smaller than petroleum, and a higher diffusion rate.

      All of which make it more likely to go kaboom.

      • Uranium 🟩
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Silly one, and but do tanks run on diesel?

        Every other heavy machine I can think of typically uses diesel for their engines: tractors, lorries, boats.

        Also diesel is less flammable then petrol or hydrogen in the event of a spill of leak…