(This is a parody for all who were unawere)

  • liyunxiao
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You stated a falsehood, outright misinformation. I am attempting to let you understand why your incredibly short sided point of view is wrong.

    In your world, with the words you have stated, all presidential candidates are immune to prosecution. That’s obviously incorrect, therefore you entire basis of objections is wrong.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      No, I did not and you repeatedly demonstrated a complete lack of understanding on how democracy works.

      Suggesting Biden should intervene in the electoral process is suggesting an action only seen in authoritarian states.

      You have an incredibly flawed understanding of philosophy or how anything works here. Is this because you don’t live in a democracy and only understand how authoritarian states like China works?

      • liyunxiao
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        If you think you have to let murderers free because of democracy, you don’t support democracy, you support murder.

        An investigation ending in a jury trial is not, by any standard, despotic nor authoritarian.

        However refusing to bring charges against someone in your same political class because they ran against you or might do so in the future absolutely is authoritarian and is the sign of an oligarchy wherein those with enough money are free from consequences.

          • liyunxiao
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If Biden was convicted of a high crime, absolutely. That’s only be constitutional.