• cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    1581·
    11 months ago

    Just to make it clear, to anyone who may be in doubt… Ussage does not affect the way your “sandwich” looks.

      • Ookami38
        17·
        11 months ago

        True enough, it’ll definitely be distended and have signs of visible arousal during the moments that someone is having vaginal intercourse. No long-term changes after arousal does down, tho.

          • Ookami38
            4·
            11 months ago

            I am too, but we’re talking about vaginas so I didn’t think it was relevant :p

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        11·
        11 months ago

        Correct but only during sex. Returns to normal after use. Not like this picture suggest that the more sex you have the more of an outie you get

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          210·
          11 months ago

          Not only that, but every 7 year all your cells in your body are replaced.

          So if you don’t have sex for 7 years, you are back to being a virgin.

          • Jax
            10·
            11 months ago

            Ah yes, obviously this is true. I’ve had to circumcise myself every 7 years as a result. Fortunately foreskins are useful for witchcraft, so it’s kind of like a side hustle.

          • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
            1·
            7 months ago

            That’s actually not true, there are quite a lot of cells in our bodies which are never replaced such as the lenses, cones, and rods in our eyes, egg cells, neurons, the hairs that detect sound in our ears, our heart muscles, among many others. The ones that do get replaced vary greatly in how long that takes or how often it happens.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          6·
          11 months ago

          They’re saying during sex which yes there are physical changes to the presentation that occur when aroused. Not this bullshit sandwich effect for sure but still, they’re not wrong it’s just a really weird point.

          • knightry@lemmy.world
            61·
            11 months ago

            The person you’re replying to is named Send me photos. I think they were just trying to get some noods.

            edit: typo

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              3·
              11 months ago

              I see that, but I responded because the person above sendmephotos was negative and it kinda bothered me.

              • Kage520@lemmy.world
                5·
                11 months ago

                As far as I know, the way it looks down there is entirely genetic. With the exception of maybe popping out a child and having an episiotomy or some such. Like men with differing penis sizes, not all vaginas are made the same.

              • liztliss@lemmy.world
                51·
                11 months ago

                My thoughts are- literally no one’s pussy looks like sandwiches with lunch meat in them. They look like a pussy, they grow and change with your body just like every single part of your body. All pussy is beautiful, regardless of what it looks like, so why the absolute fuck are you so concerned with comparing yours to anyone else’s?

                Edit: and the fact that apparently you and your partner’s sex life is non-existent except to force new people to exist in this toxic sounding life of yours is really not the flex you think it is…

              • elint@programming.dev
                3·
                11 months ago

                find it hard to believe that a newborn baby girl could have an overflowing-roast beef-looking vulva like that photo up there on the left.

                Yes, newborn babies have not yet gone through puberty, where hormones cause quite a bit of growth and change in our reproductive organs, so you are correct that you should not expect such large labia on a newborn baby.

      • Droechai@lemm.ee
        4·
        11 months ago

        The size of labia would stay the same, the muscles inside would change but not in regards to number of partners but how much exercise the muscles would get.

        The virgin are much less in the risk of pregnancy, which carries the danger of rips and tear in the area at child birth

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    1411·
    11 months ago

    Why does it seem like they all have weird obsessions with their own children’s genitalia?

  • Nobody@lemmy.worldEnglish
    481·
    11 months ago

    “I fucked her so good it caused her labia to grow. Then, the hooker gave me my money back. True story, bro.”

    • tweeks@feddit.nl
      13·
      11 months ago

      Or other women who see this. Both are normal variations. Although I wouldn’t recommend sticking it between some buns.

    • rosymind@leminal.space
      10·
      11 months ago

      It’s so gross and weird. Also this makes no sense.

      Mine looks more like the one on the right, and I’ve been around the block more times than I can count… it’s just physiology, sex parts look different for us all. Just like every dick I’ve seen in person looks a bit different from the one before. Some are longer, shorter, wider, bent to the right or left, different shades, some even have cute lil moles on them, some hairier higher on the shaft than others. We’re just different and that’s fun!

      This is wrong on so many levels: body shaming, incest, “slut” shaming, describing how his own child’s reproductive bits look like, just… ugh

  • don@lemm.ee
    392·
    11 months ago

    He’s saying his daughters are cheap and next to nothing compared to Taylor Swift’s vagina, which is an incredibly weird thing to say.

    “You know how when you buy a ham sandwich, you’re usually buying it primarily for the ham? My daughters are represented by the sandwich on the right. Taylor Swift’s genitalia is represented by the one on the left. I think I’ve made my point. Praise the Lord!”

  • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
    33·
    11 months ago

    If I’m eating a ham sandwich, I’m eating the one with the most ham in it.

    Although that looks like some watery reformed lowest price shit ham.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    301·
    11 months ago

    I’m no expert on Taylor Swift…but hasn’t she always been particularly picky on the people she’s dated?

    I know why they’re going immediately to the “she’s obviously a whore” trope, but it’s not even fucking true!

  • shammy@lemmy.world
    261·
    11 months ago

    This argument is so tired and cringe lol, there’s no difference between fucking many guys and fucking the same guy many times.

    • Cjwii@lemm.ee
      404·
      11 months ago

      I think what he’s saying is that his dick is so small that when he rapes his daughters for Jesus he doesn’t do much physical damage, it’s just purely mental and emotional trauma.

      • shammy@lemmy.world
        73·
        11 months ago

        God damn lmao. I think the joke is that women who sleep around are loose…not that he rapes his daughters 💀

        • Leg@lemmy.world
          121·
          11 months ago

          I’m pretty sure homie wasn’t being deadass. He’s calling Dad of the Year sussy for obsessing over his daughters’ vaginas and how much sex he wants them to have with other men in the name of keeping their vaginas aesthetically pleasing to his eyes.

          Are you perhaps on the spectrum? Taking jokes literally is something that tends to happen (not trying to be rude. I am autistic, and I do it often).

          • downhomechunk@midwest.socialOPEnglish
            4·
            11 months ago

            I think this person made a joke of the joke. Neurotypicals miss jokes often too. I have a very dry, sarcastic sense of humor and a lot of the time my weird jokes don’t land. I also have a young daughter who may be on the spectrum. She’s my little clone and so I’m reviewing a lot of my own eccentricities through a new lens. (All of this is a serious reply)