• Cicraft
      link
      fedilink
      45 months ago

      What defines a country as latin american? I thought it was speaking a romance language, like Argentina, Brazil or Quebec

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        85 months ago

        I thought it was the parts of the American continents that were originally settled by the people of Latin based languages

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          Latin-America is the geo political equivalent of a bully victim, the bully being the US. I refer you to all the sanctions, embargoes, government coups, etc.

          If Texas somehow manages to secede, it becomes Northern Mexico.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    905 months ago

    Wouldn’t it be great if the US started relocating it’s military bases to other states? I’m sure NM, MI or CA would be happy to have them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1165 months ago

      That’s already happening, because the draconian antitrans and anti-abortion laws are impacting readiness in those states and driving down recruitment.

    • theotherone
      link
      fedilink
      555 months ago

      Oh you mean the 42 town-sized forward operating bases inside the treasonous province? They will come in very handy in the 72 hours it takes to resecure that territory.

      • peopleproblems
        link
        fedilink
        245 months ago

        I always wondered how quick that would go down.

        72 hours seems quick, but I guess they wouldn’t really encounter actual resistance.

        • PugJesusOP
          link
          fedilink
          165 months ago

          We did Baghdad in a month; we could do Austin in three days.

            • PugJesusOP
              link
              fedilink
              135 months ago

              Probably, but nothing makes a statement like taking a regime’s capital.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Both of which are much better for the world than the current main industries of Texas: fossil fuels and fascism.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                25 months ago

                Houston is the 4th largest city in the country, and generates a shitload of oil revenue. That’s way more important than Austin.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              makes it real easy to justify liberating it then, doesn’t it? most of the people living there want to remain part of the US.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        55 months ago

        Do people really think that the servicemen in the military would willingly attack Texans? I have a huge suspicion that they’d revolt within the armed forces.

        • wanderingmagus
          link
          fedilink
          145 months ago

          As someone currently serving active duty, yes - depending on the command climate and the servicemember. Especially if the targets are labeled as insurgents and a VEO threat with credible evidence. Now, bombing noncombatant civilians is a different story, but as far as conducting surgical strikes on domestic terrorists, no hesitation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        265 months ago

        If it’s anything like the rest, they just leave toxic fuel spills to slowly seep into all the aquifers

        • PugJesusOP
          link
          fedilink
          315 months ago

          Perfect. Texas loves not having environmental regulations, so there shouldn’t be any issue!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            255 months ago

            lol their power grid is already so fucked that key strikes against it would leave them wondering if it was part of the combat or if it had just failed of its own accord

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    525 months ago

    Tell them it’s for their own good! They don’t even have an electrical grid that works properly!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    505 months ago

    I imagine if the US wanted to, they could embargo it, and most if not all other nations would just see it as a parent putting a 6yo to the corner; not their job.

    • CurlyWurlies4All
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      I think plenty of little desert countries have recently proved that the biggest military in the world might have some issues dealing with insurgencies.

      • cheesepotatoes
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        True. Imagine how much more successful a Texan insurgency force would be compared to the middle east. Their armored division would be formidable, the thunderous roar of hundreds of mobility scooters.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45 months ago

    We aren’t seceding, we promise. Sure it’s interesting as a thought experiment. Texas has lots of things similar to developed nations, some of which many other states don’t like international airport, excessive land, military bases (not sure on the comparison here), several industries including a huge chunk of the petroleum industry.

    I think it’s silly to pretend it would happen though, are we unhappy with the federal government? Sure, who is honestly pleased with how things have been trending lately, or even the past couple decades? But we have issues with our local government too, so it’s not like it would be all sunshine and sweet tea if we didn’t have the rest of the U. S.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        Exactly

        If anything that’s an immediate foothold and for Texas, a serious defensive liability, not an asset in any way.

        Not that anything will ever come of this, but if Texas were to violently secede, it’s highly likely that the US could put down the secession, occupy and assume control of the territory, and manage the forced reunification of same…

        …all using only the US military forces already within the borders of Texas.

        Again, not that it’s actually going to happen, but in a just world, we’d let them do it, then occupy the “rogue state” and re-annex them, but as a territory.

        Basically nothing changes for the citizenry except they lose the impact of the vote. Texas now gets one non-voting member in each chamber of the legislature, and send no electors to Washington for presidential elections.

        They should also lose the ability to govern themselves at the state level and instead, affairs within the territory are managed by a joint panel of provisional military government working together with state department officials and UN observers.

        While they’re at it, let the US seize and nationalize all corporations, which now roll all profit back into reimbursing the American taxpayers for their trouble and expense of dealing with this Texan nonsense.

      • @maccentric
        link
        English
        35 months ago

        The USA has bases all over the world, there’s even one in Cuba (which I’ve never understood)

  • Tb0n3
    link
    English
    15 months ago

    Isn’t the overabundance of brown people the crux of the issue? That being illegal immigrants that Texas doesn’t have the resources to handle and by shipping them to NYC they’re trying to point out that it’s a problem.

    • kersplooshA
      link
      15 months ago

      The border was effectively open until the 1970s. Clamping down harder on immigration only seems to be making things worse. Malcolm Gladwell did an interesting podcast on that theme:
      https://www.pushkin.fm/podcasts/revisionist-history/general-chapmans-last-stand

      It’s possible that if the US in general (and Texas in particular) just chilled out about immigration and let people move freely then things would greatly improve.