• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What was stopping them from just hucking grenades over to the Germans to begin with? You don’t typically have to exploit trust of the enemy on the battlefield to throw a grenade.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s much more effective if they are grouped together waiting to catch the grenade. It also reveals the position of the soldiers in the trench.

      Grenades aren’t very effective in trenches, unless the victim is close by. The narrow shape and curves of the trench can shield a person from a nearby blast.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you’re in a trench in wartime and fist sized object comes flying in from the direction of the enemy forces you’re going to dive away from it and take cover. But then the thrown object turns out to be a can of food, not an explosive.

      So how do you respond to the next thrown item? Do you still dive for cover?

      The rational answer is “yes.” The starving soldier desperate for a break from the fighting answer was not.

      • Voroxpete
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Plus trenches have dugouts and the like. You can imagine that after the first round of corned beef, people were probably waking their mates up, yelling at everyone to get out here and see what’s happening.

        It’s ingenious, in a horrifyingly cruel way.