• Lad
    link
    fedilink
    903 months ago

    Urban Dictionary has helped me with so many words over the years.

    • merde alors
      link
      333 months ago

      now that Wiktionary has the definition of hot carl, urban dictionary is redundant 🙈

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        193 months ago

        Possibly misapplied from hot carl “a cheap red wine enema, usually involving Carlo Rossi Merlot”.

        w-what

  • @Steamymoomilk
    link
    English
    333 months ago

    Somthing somthing skibbity toilet blue waffels?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      223 months ago

      I’m a middle-aged nerd so I have zero clue what the hell any of this means and I refuse to find out

  • deweydecibel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    283 months ago

    Urban dictionary only works when the people using the terms go there to define them and upvoted the definitions.

    And young people nowadays don’t do anything online if it isn’t an app.

    • kase
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      Tbf I thought urban dictionary had an app

    • Deebster
      link
      fedilink
      23 months ago

      I keep seeing stupid, seemingly very person-specific definitions get the votes, stuff like “John: a really sexy, clever boy that all the girls want to be with”

    • @Imgonnatrythis
      link
      63 months ago

      I dunno but it’s cartoon better have a little tin cup and be begging - they are aggressive AF with trying to get donations. In general, but especially if you ever give them money.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        They sorta have to be aggressive because it’s damn near impossible to get people to pay for online services nowadays. Everybody expects to get everything for free, but also nobody wants to see ads (for a good reason too, mind you.)

        • @Imgonnatrythis
          link
          -33 months ago

          Yeah, I wish they would push a different model. I think the charity model is likely unsustainable long term. Quality contributions to the information should buy you some access and perhaps everyone gets access to some basic info on entries but more in depth data requires a micropayment perhaps.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It would get infested with bots writing articles and other bots upvoting the quality status. The people with resources to do that wouldn’t have any interest in telling the truth.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            Unfortunately that’d probably kill it ded; like I said, people are really loath to pay for online services.

            • @Imgonnatrythis
              link
              23 months ago

              Kagi been doing well. I think tides are shifting

          • @brbposting
            link
            13 months ago

            PAYWALL WIKIPEDIA?!

            How dare you sir!

            They take heat for fundraising like they’re on the edge although they have full coffers. Hopefully it’s sustainable!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 months ago

    Especially considering urban dictionary consists almost entirely of shock humor and isn’t really a good resource for you know, actually understanding people.

  • @EmoDuck
    link
    33 months ago

    A thesaurus is just a dictionary remixed