• ElderWendigo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    ‘Struggle with generosity’ is to greed, like ‘died as a result of an officer involved shooting’ is to murder.

    • otp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I would say there’s a distinction.

      “I want more” is different from “I don’t want to share”.

      • geogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        7 months ago

        The American heritage dictionary definition 1: ^ An excessive desire to acquire or possess more than what one needs or deserves, especially with respect to material wealth.

        Seems that both fall squarely within the definition of greed.

        • thesilverpig@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I give you kudos for going American Heritage. It’s the best American English Dictionary. Way better than Webster.

          • Resonosity@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Friendly reminder that a website like OneLook.com compiles dictionaries and thesauruses from all of the major, reputable sources, including the American Heritage Dictionary and Merriam-Webster.

        • otp
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          If the other commenter’s point is that “struggling with generosity” is just another way to say “greed”, then I think that’s overly reductionist

          • ElderWendigo
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Obviously, but not overly unless you’re being intentionally obtuse. Making abstract statements kinda requires reducing them to an common element, theme, or dimension. That’s what abstraction and syllogism are all about.

      • ElderWendigo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Is it? Why? That doesn’t seem self evident to me at all.

        • Donkter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You could be unwilling to share what you have while also not desiring more of what you have. They are just two different concepts.

        • V4sh3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not wanting to share my fries doesn’t automatically mean I also want more fries than I already have.

      • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well the definition of greed is:

        intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food.

        Both “I want more” and “I don’t want to share” are a type of greed. Even if the definition is more like needs more of something, not wanting to share feels like a form of needing more time than you need with an object. At least that’s how I’m looking at it.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          True. I guess I’m guilty of “I want more” as much as the next guy. But I don’t suffer from the “I don’t want to share” part. If everyone gets more, we all rise up. A good tide lifts all ships.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Friend making $450k as a software engineer

    I’m a software developer. If I just start calling myself an engineer, can I have 450k?

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are you a senior or staff software engineer for a multinational tech company in the Bay Area or NYC?

      $450k is typical in that case.

      • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Seniors are usually pulling around $200k in NYC, plus stock worth around $100k. Still crazy high, but not nearly $450k unless they’ve been there for a very long time, and the high CoL makes it worth about half of that.

        Staff engineers, as in those who write 4 lines of code a year, are closer to $450k

        • evatronic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          Staff engineers get paid the big bucks to spend all day in meetings so the rest of us don’t have to.

          Worth it.

          • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hello, I’d like to apply to be staff engineer, I will even accept a lower salary if I can call the client/user a dumbass for contradicting themselves during the meeting

          • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Yeah, that’s net including ~$100k of stock distributed over 4 years. The base starting is around $130k for a low level SWE. As the years to by, the base salary goes up to a little over $200k for seniors, but the stock refreshes aren’t usually as large as the initial.

            Of course, it also depends on how the company is doing as a whole. Lately Googs has been struggling and laying off people.

    • wwaxen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Check the law where you live. Engineer is in many places a restricted profession like lawyer or doctor.

      • cbarrick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s not restricted in the US.

        If the person is calling themselves a “software developer” instead of a “software engineer” then they almost certainly live some place where “engineer” is a restricted term.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          No, software developer isn’t a fallback term for software engineer, they have slightly different implications. They’re all very loosely defined so they’re almost interchangeable

          • cbarrick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 months ago

            Really? Do you know of a company that has both developers and engineers where the distinction is not location?

            Where I work, we have both, but it’s purely a location thing. In the American offices we’re called “engineers”, yet my coworkers in Canada are called “developers” despite doing the exact same work. We don’t have “developers” in the US.

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s usually one or the other. It just doesn’t matter which one

              At my first job I was on a contract as a software engineer I with the job title junior developer, because that’s just how the titles mapped

        • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s somewhat restricted. You can’t hold yourself out as a civil engineer without passing the exam, for example. For made up jobs like software “engineer” there are no rules — it’s like the FDA with regard to actual food vs. supplements.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        [serious] There is medication that can help regulate your flood of emotions that cause you to lash out at people.

        Also, I’m not sure comparing a joke about the term “engineer” to a Nazi-Defector is really appropriate. If your intention was humor, you might want to reevaluate that joke.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There was a program many years back that discussed this issue. It showed two kids, young girls, one was fairly well off and had all the things you’d expect a young girl to have and some to spare. The other was a young girl living in an impoverished nation and had a very poor family. Think tin roof on adobe walls kind of poor. She had a single stuffed animal that was in dubious shape handed down from child to child. The well-off girl had a small army of stuffed animals.

    Point of the segment in the program was how difficult it was for the well off girl to share anything and how possessive she was for her material things, whereas the little girl that had very few things was willing to share her one stuffed animal quite willingly.

    Wish I could remember the show. But it demonstrated quite handily that even at a young age people who had more, wanted more, and were unwilling to part with even small things vs the people who had very little.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Seems like a vicious cycle with the wealthier people. Since they can buy anything their kids need, there’s no need to learn to share. It’s all “yours” or “mine”, nothing ever “ours”.

  • Grass
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 months ago

    I had to read a bit to understand what this meant because I didn’t know what venmo was, but I have seen people change from being weirdly generous to making more money and fairly quickly becoming irritatingly stingy to the point of nitpicking the rounding when pennies were discontinued.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      You sure they’re making more money and not just trying to look like they are while balancing a fuck ton of debt? I know people like this. Appearances are everything to them.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I didn’t know what it was either. If someone wanted me to send them money remotely, I’d probably use Google Pay or PayPal or something. Hooray for being out of touch with the world today!

      • ZeroTwo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        A huge reason I don’t use venmo is because it just feels like Facebook Banking. I don’t need status updates on money my friends are receiving or sending to other people nor do I want other people to know what I do with my money. That shit was so weird to me.

        • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          IDK why people make their transactions public. I changed my default to private for that very reason. I don’t give a shot what other people are doing and no one needs to know what I’m doing either.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    “If someone does the small-dollar Venmo, it means they don’t feel good,” Bradley says.

    So many thoughts after reading this article.

    The first is a former partner. We both grew up in families with more than most. She always wanted to make sure we shared all costs (shared Ubers, dinners, etc). I was of the mindset that we each cover things case by case. I’ll get this one, you get the next one; it’ll more or less balance out. If it feels like I’m disproportionately covering more than my share, I’ll let you know. She couldn’t think that way.

    Further: she’d never had a job and was about to earn her doctorate in psychology. She would later counsel people who would inevitably bring money concerns to her with no experience in any job other than being a fucking doctor. What the eff, I thought. I’ve worked in a factory, in a restaurant, in retail… Sure, I also later worked at one of the FAANG companies as an engineer and currently work supporting a VIP at a huge agency. But I’ve been broke and desperate at times even if I could call upon family if things were so bad that I couldn’t manage. Most aren’t so lucky. How would she ever have any perspective?

    Finally, I don’t let anyone know my monetary status. Sure, you can figure out that I’m doing ok by the new but modest car that I drive, the apartment I rent, or my home theatre system. But I continue to think of myself as a commoner because I don’t have the sort of wealth that lets me purchase favors like the truly wealthy can and do. I live comfortably, not in luxury. I can’t imagine being so well off that I couldn’t spare a few bucks for a friend without keeping track.

    I think the statement that I quoted above probably rings true, but there’s likely a lot more to it. I think it represents a sense of guilt over having more than others and internally recognizing that it’s unfair but not having the ability to square it.

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 months ago

    One of the many reasons that I don’t have venmo or any other form of transfer app is so people can’t send me some nominal sum of money.

    I’m not rich, but definitely one of the higher earners at my job. I don’t want some person making less than half what I do worrying about a slice of pizza or a cup of coffee.

    To note: This is also not something I gloat over or continuously remind people of or any such thing. I’m just happy to have the resources to be able to bring the smallest smidgen of “make your day a little less shitty”

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        “I’ll get cash to you later”

        If they need the money immediately and/or digitally they shouldn’t have put it all on their card without discussion.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It is amazing how rich people deal with non-rich people. I managed to climb from poor to reasonable well off, but I cannot understand people who earn many times the money I get to be assholes over small money.

    Last week, I took a student that I want to “groom” to work in our development department to an electronics fair. Train, hotel, and ticket were paid for by the company, but the deal was that he has to pay for anything else by himself. Eating out and other expenses are still quite some money for a student, so I paid for his meals out of my own pocket and told him that one time in the future, when he will be the one guiding a student through the same situation, he should do as I did.

    • MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I understand what you mean with groom, but poor choice of words. 😂

      Mentor/onboard/fast track, or any other would have sounded better. Groom just sounded like you wanted to fuck him.

      • atkion
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I disagree honestly, the context made it very clear what was meant here, and was a proper use of the word imo.

      • CancerMancer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        The word has been used that way for a long time though.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s this joke about how dutch people will spend €5 in gas to drive to a place where they can get gratis (free) something that’s worth €2.

      It really is a generic cultural thing and expecting all to pay their share even if supidly small is not at all personal.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m working poor and always have been. I never mind buying other people drinks or paying for their fares or whatnot, even if they make more money than I do. My philosophy is that I don’t make nearly enough money to ever become rich or even well off, so what would it matter that I turn every cent around fifteen times or not? If at the end of the day I’m happy, and at the end of the month I’m not starving, then I’m living.

    I’m suffering from enough shit already (chronic depression, adhd, etc) that complicating my life extra by tracking every red cent in order to deny myself and my family the last few pleasures making life worth living is not an option.

    Of course, with this kind of attitude it’s unlikely I’ll ever become rich, even if I find a high-income job, since I care little about “making it grow”. For all I know WW3 could break out tomorrow rendering EUR & USD near worthless. Then what does it matter how much you saved up?

  • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This isn’t any sort of real explanation of anything. It’s just someone’s opinion. They call her an “expert”. She’s a certified financial planner with no formal schooling or training. She passed a test and runs a company where she advises people who have suddenly come into a lot of money. That’s her only expertise. She has no background in psychology or any information beyond “it rings true” to back up her statements.

    • lobotomo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Grew up in a resort town known for its plethora of rich people.

      Rich people are near universally the cheapest group of people I’ve ever encountered.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The article talks about how this is not them being assholes, but because if they have more money then their peers, it tends to make them feel isolated and self-conscious and fears about being taken advantage of. They even quote the expert at the end who says “They don’t care about the $4.”

      You would ditch a friend for struggling with someone? I find that hard to believe.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          True, but people do things they shouldn’t do all the time because they are struggling. Like if your depressed friend flakes on hanging out, that’s “shitty behavior” too. Are they are bad person who you should ditch? Or a friend suffering that needs your support? In both cases, it seems to be the latter.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            If they need my support, they can ask for my support. They’re asking for money.

            If you can’t open up to me enough to say “I need your help,” I don’t think we were very good friends in the first place.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              7 months ago

              So, a depressed person who flakes on hanging out is a bad person you should ditch.

              You and I are very different with our friends.

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  You answered the question indirectly. Or intentionally avoided it because you don’t want to admit some inconsistency. I figured the former, but maybe I was wrong. So which is it?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            You’re right. I do cover other people’s meals when I can afford to do so. But I don’t send someone $4 for no reason. You keep bringing up irrelevancies.

            And insults are not called for. I did not insult you once.

            • whoreticulture@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              This is the first time I’ve engaged with you on this topic, idk what you’re talking about. “seems like an ass” is not an insult, please learn how to read or get thicker skin

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                7 months ago

                So you’re telling me that if you told a complete stranger “you seem like a total ass” when you could look them in the eye, they wouldn’t feel insulted? Really? Because I think it sounds like a good way to provoke a physical altercation.

              • ickplant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                Insult (noun): an offensive remark or action.

                Are you saying calling someone an ass is not offensive? Have you fallen out of the dumb tree and hit every branch on the way down (that’s an insult, btw)?

    • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This thread got literally too deep for me to follow so I hope it was worked out.

      Last I got out of it - it’s a cry for help in the form of a conversation starter. Very interesting take, thank you both for that.

      Also, money can be hard to talk about between friends.

    • ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I was once very poor and now pretty well-off. I’m generally happy to try and pick up the bill when I go out with friends and family because I’m thankfully in a place in my life I can do that and I remember how thankful I was for the generosity of others early in my life. Unfortunately I’ve found some people get offended… that my picking up the bill is some power move to show I’m rich so I’ve become reluctant to do that unless I’ve explicitly invited them to dinner or whatever. I don’t want people to think I’m showing off and trying to make them feel inferior so if they’ve invited me or it’s an otherwise group event, I assume they’re paying their own way and didn’t come with the idea that someone else was paying for them. If somehow I’m the one whose credit card it ends up on because the place won’t split the bill, I’ll let people know how to Venmo me or whatever. It’s not because I’m worried about the money though.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    As someone whose situation in life has flipped (not ever really that rich, just had family that was worse off) and has suffered it, I can confirm that:

    “They don’t want to be taken advantage of or to feel like, ‘I have money and that’s why people hang out with me,’” Bradley says. “It feels very invalidating.”

    Because it is true. The more money you have in a situation attracts the sort of people who just want the benefits of it, and if you are generous like my parents were, those sort of people will be the ones who will have no problem becoming stingy and refuse to help them out afterwards without a dollar sign. They’ve been trained to live off of you and they will still continue to expect to do so even as so far as to believe you are lying while they become the stingiest.

    What this article gets wrong is that it isn’t because they value money transactions more, it’s that they attract the sort of people who only value them for it. Plus, it also skews your own development as a person because if they come the norm in your surrounding, it fosters an environment of making you a mark.

    They do not have the same life experience as you, and you may very well be part of the problem is paying your fair share when you are with someone you consider wealthy (even when they tell you they are no longer doing that good or simply seems more bothered by it) offends you.

  • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I think the answer is simply “people who have more money pay more attention to their finances in general”. I mean, people who don’t pay attention to how they’re spending money tend to not stay rich, even when they have a high paying job. But then again, is there any actual evidence that the premise is true? Or is it just a bias that people take more notice when a rich friend asks to pay them back?

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    It kind of makes sense, though. I grew up a povvo bitch, so if someone wanted to borrow money there were basically two outcomes

    A) We simply didn’t have the money to lend them
    B) We had the money and might as well help them out because we like the person and they’d do the same in turn; at the end of the day we’d still struggle, so a bit less doesn’t make a massive difference

  • eclipse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel like I’m the exact opposite of what this article proposed however the entire thing confuses me.

    I’m not rich but relatively well off, and, without doubt in the best financial position of my immediate group of friends.

    If I happen to be the one that picks up the bill I often have people chasing me to pay me. I actually think that is a problem because they feel obliged to do the right thing, however I’m unmotivated because I don’t care about the outcome – I don’t need the money. This is my fault and I feel poorly for it but the reality is that after I’ve had a nice evening I don’t really care. In terms of the debt: honestly I probably wouldn’t bother asking.

    The very concept of asking someone for 4 bucks seems abhorrent to me. To be clear, I say this personally; I’m not struggling to pay rent/mortgage/utilities/whatever. If you’re in a position where those are concerns then please absolutely follow up.

    Chasing a $4 debt won’t make you rich, ever. Even if you do it all the time. Anyone well off chasing this kind of cash is deluding themselves.

    Generally speaking my friends and I operate over a long term fairness principle. “Bob got the last round, I’ll get the next”; they won’t be even but our assumption is that it’ll balance in the long term. That applies to more than just the pub.