Among AARP survey findings: 61% of Americans 50 and up are worried they won’t have enough money for retirement. And only 21 percent of people have a retirement plan.

An increasing number of people are worried that they won’t have enough money to live comfortably in retirement, and men aren’t as financially secure as they once were, according to an annual survey from AARP.

The AARP Financial Security Trends Survey, conducted in January and released in April, included interviews with more than 8,300 Americans over 30 across every state in the country. Conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago, the survey aims to analyze the financial experiences and attitudes among Americans.

One of the survey’s biggest findings is that 61% of those 50 and up are worried they won’t have enough money for retirement, Indira Venkat, senior vice president of research at AARP, told USA TODAY on Wednesday.

And if you break those numbers down even more, one in five of people who have not retired have no savings at all, Venkat said.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you are still young and working try to remember this: time is on your side. Any small amounts you can put away now for later really helps. I know so many people who say they cannot afford to save and invest for retirement. I totally get it. If you are living paycheck to paycheck, trying to save any money sounds laughable / impossible.

    However, if your employer has a 401k plan and they do any matching: do whatever you have to in order to meet that matching. It’s a vital part of your compensation. If you are not investing up to that matching level, you are throwing part of your paycheck away. It’s not just white collar office jobs that have 401k plans. Even some fast food places offer these, as do many blue collar jobs.

    These are all short-term / individual things to consider. Long term we need more unions, more worker cooperatives, and more corporations paying their fucking taxes.

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes. Because compound interest is exponential. At 10, 20, 30 years you have 2X, 4X, and 8X your money. Assuming about 7 pct interest.

      If you start now, you can get away with putting a few hundred a month away. If you wait until you’re 40 or 50 you have to be putting thousands away per month.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Something that is vs something that might be. The economy doesn’t work on what ifs and neither does saving money.

          • businessfish@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            you aren’t the only one, shit is scary lately. but i’ve personally taken that as initiative to go do/buy the things i want (that i can afford) now instead of later in my life when i have more money/time, because realistically i don’t know that i will have more money/time when i’m older if things keep up as they are right now.

            it hurts to think about.

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What I hear is 61% of Americans should be voting for politicians that want to support and bolster social security.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Are those a thing? Where I live we have a liberal government and they don’t give a single shit about the working class, just like the conservatives

      • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Well yeah, because liberal != progressive or even remotely leftist.

        Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan were both (neo)liberals.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Social Democrats are also a kind of liberal, but most Americans seem like they just keep right on heading towards democratic socialism or anarchism if they’re already prepared to reject neoliberalism.

  • krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wait, so 61% of people are worried they don’t have enough to retire but only 21% of people have any retirement plan at all? What the fuck do those 40% of respondents who worry but have no plan think is going to happen at 65?

  • freewheel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    Garbage. I’m over 50 and I’m not worried.

    I know for a fact I’ll be working till the day I die.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not only Americans. Pretty much the whole West, especially people who were unlucky not to buy their own places. My rent is 1600, without bills, my projected rent is 2500. And mind you, I am well above the average.

    I have zero trust that when it is time for me to retire I will have money to pay my rent, bills and have something left for food. Because my rent will also increase in price and also the inflation will be 40-60% higher. It is really f****d up situation.

    • BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly if your rent is only 1600 then your probably not in one of the super high COL places either which is wild. Well paid people in NY and San Francisco are going to have to die on the job while barely making their rent in 50 years. Everyone’s fucked if nothing changes.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Something will change, whether the outcome is positive or negative for us is up in the air

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          You know, the ruling class doesn’t want us to be able to afford buying our own places and eventually retiring early. They want us working till we die.

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I am not working in the states. I am working in a city where the average salary is 3000€, and rent is 25/sq.m. or ~2.3€/sq.f. and mind you in other places rent/salary is even higher like in Lisbon, which is popular expat and tourists destination

    • Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      Super nice.

      I recommend travelling.

      You still get your social security while abroad, which is enough to live off of in most countries.

      A little goes a long way abroad.

        • Varyk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You aren’t outsourcing your retirement since you and your country is paying for it, you’re contributing to local economies, you can learn so much by traveling; this isn’t really the poison pill your your pearls are suffering for.

          • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I’m at once advocating escaping the dystopia that America has become and passing judgement on America, not any other country.

            I assume I’ll work til I’m dead, or until I can afford to move to Indonesia. That’s it. Relying on the government has never worked out in my favor, I’m not going to start now.

            • Varyk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Why Indonesia? It’s run by the mobsters that committed a horrible violent coup and mass killings a couple generations ago.

              You might want to choose another destination, that one is depressing.

              Bright side, you do not need much money to permanently live abroad and it’ll give you way more free time than working until you’re dead.

              • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Indo is a vast place. Islands have entirely different cultures than other ones.

                I spent 6 weeks there a decade ago. You couldnt pay me to step foot on Java, but Lombok? North Sulawesi/Manado?

                Yes please. Google Bunaken, it’s right off the coast of Manado in the shade of a volcano. Diving in there, you look one direction, theres 1000 different species of fish. Look the other direction, there’s an entire different 1000 species. One of the largest confluences of life on the planet.

                • Varyk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Nice. For me, it’s the same reason I never visited North Korea, I just have a problem supporting the regime.

                  But I do love visiting sprawling countries and especially the small towns within them, so I completely understand regional diversity.

                  And while the regime is a problem, it isn’t as globally dangerous as North Korea.

                  So you went diving in bunaken?

  • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m 26 and I don’t expect to be able to retire. I just hope I can keep up in my field when I’m old. It’s weird thinking of an old person fixing computers, though.

    • pacoboyd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s funny because I’m an old person in IT and we struggle to find new hires that know how to troubleshoot beyond basic issues. Most of them might have been the techy for thier family but few have experience with actual enterprise solutions, that’s only something that comes with experience.

      • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s going to get increasingly harder to find competent young workers because entry level positions are getting automated away, as well as our deteriorating collective attention spans to actually give a shit

      • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I just started my career in IT, I only have about 3 years of experience in the field. The biggest issue with finding young people, imo, is wanting people with experience. Fresh outta college kids aren’t going to have the knowledge and experience most entry level positions are looking for. I got incredibly lucky with my career, but I know people who were brilliant in college (I was not) who are currently working retail because it’s so hard to get into entry level positions.

        • pacoboyd@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          This was more of a comment on the poster above feeling like he’s gonna be irrelevant when he’s older. That’s not true, at least in my experience, if you are passionate about IT, your knowledge will age like fine wine.

          I didn’t mean to imply that you should have all the experience right out of the gate, just that you may start out thinking you know all that and will be irrelevant by 30, but that’s not the case. Wait until you find out all the stuff you don’t know! (this is a good thing, not bad)

          • LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ah okay. I misunderstood a bit lol. I work at an MSP, so I learned that I don’t know jack shit on day one. Every single work day I am met with something new and wacky to fix. The horrors persist, but so do I.

    • Avg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      My 401k provider keeps telling me I should have more saved for retirement but it’s literally illegal for me to contribute more

      • Kadaj21@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh so does mine. It wants me to have like $450k in there by 45. I have $15k. Only like 125% of my pay for the next 5 years to make it! Forget the bills or eating. RIP

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    As a 40 year old person here I thought the retirement plan for my generation was to get a nice ergonomic office chair and die in it while still playing of my kids student debt and overvalued mortgage.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nice, I like the wood grain, gives it a nice I’m a horrible executive vibe to it, the seat padding looks from a distance okay but the lumbar support looks to be lacking.

        • Doxatek@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Haha definitely true. I’ll just use my regular office chair to die in too much better back support

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It’s not in capitals interest to let people retire. The system is working properly and as designed.

    The great machine in it’s late last stages hungers even more, needs to be fed more and more workers to take their labour and wages.

    To lower overall production and lower the working-for-survival hours of the population would only benefit humanity and the planets biodiversity, but would be just too cruel to the capital. In dire times like these we must think of the poor capital.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’s not in capitals interest to let people retire

      Instead they just lay off people who have been on the payroll for “too long”.

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Money? Bruh I’m more worried about climate change meaning mass migration when whole regions become uninhabitable because they can’t produce food any more.

    Is that reasonable? Maybe. I looked for data once and saw an estimate that that’s not going to happen until at least the year 2100. I don’t know how accurate that is.

    But even if it’s not, there’s still the current and tangible rise of fascist politics around the world, and while I’m in their ethnic demographic, I’m not nearly right-wing enough to be on their good side.