• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2092 months ago

    Any company that intentionally underpays their employees so that they require govt assistance to live should be billed the full cost of all assistance that employee receives.

      • @talentedkiwi
        link
        English
        221 month ago

        I imagine that’s part of their point? At least that is how I took it.

      • @threelonmusketeers
        link
        English
        81 month ago

        UBI could be even less complicated. If everyone were guaranteed a livable income, a minimum wage might not even be necessary.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          I like Scott Galloway’s take: SPEAK THEIR LANGUAGE!

          Call UBI a negative tax and Republican voters will listen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 month ago

      The wealthy NEED the airports to keep running so not to interfere with their vacation plan. Starving kids on the other hand can simply be rewoven as doormats by any good capitalist.

  • Adam
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1332 months ago

    How is being paid “from pushback to arrival” even vaguely legal?

      • the post of tom joad
        link
        English
        412 months ago

        Remember when a letter from an airline exec was all it took for the cdc to reduce COVID sick leave? PFR…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      502 months ago

      Even fast food restaraunts in airports pay a higher hourly rate to compensate the staff for the added pain in the balls for getting to work.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      212 months ago

      they’re salaried? only thing I can come up with.

      If they’re infact hourly… then work is work, and they’re working off the clock.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      Been that way forever. Parking brake release with door closed was the standard for a long time. Now they have parking systems on the terminal that sense the aircraft and don’t start the clock until the aircraft pushes back, and stop the clock as soon as it’s parked even if you’re sitting there for 30 minutes waiting for the jet bridge or whatever.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Yeah but they also used to have a good enough pay that it was still an okay deal, even if the clock only ran during aircraft movement. It’s still the case with other airlines I have an old friend that went to work for Etihad and he seems to be doing fine. Tells me about the nice weekends away all over the world during rest time, lives in a nice apartment in Dubai with a view, etc. Granted I’d never want to live there but I’m sure you can achieve similar lifestyle with other international airlines (Singapore, KLM, etc etc).

  • RubberDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    882 months ago

    If your boss requires you to be somewhere at a specific time… then that is work … right?

    And being on the other end means you are still at work. It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      832 months ago

      It is strange that this job went from glamorous to real shit.

      You had a government mandated floor on prices until the 70’s in the USA and the 90’s in the EU, which meant that airlines had to compete on amenities and other ways to pull traffic to their airline. Once that price floor was removed, it became apparent that ticket prices were what drove most traffic, so airlines started doing whatever they could to drop ticket prices.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    fedilink
    English
    752 months ago

    I hope the unions give these bastards a nice, swift kick in the ass.

    If anyone should be taking a pay cut, it’s the shitty CEO’s whose decisions make flying a miserable experience.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 months ago

    I haven’t flown in a while, have they already started asking us to tip flight attendants?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They are/were. The pilots’ union ratfucked them in the Reagan years and they never recovered because, ya know, the rest of the Reagan years.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 month ago

    they are only set to warn little more than $27,000 per year before tax.

    I know that writing is hard, especially when using AI, but please proof read your posts?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      Oh no, a typo from hitting a key right next to the intended key, this has never happened in the history of journalism!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        Not only that, the the typo is a legitimate word, meaning it won’t be flagged by spell check. HOWEVER, that’s no excuse to not proofread a submitted article. In fact, it’s more reason why one should.

    • soloOP
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      Why you say this the author seems legit. No?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -372 months ago

    Well flight attendants have the luxury of not having to live in a single place. I would live in some cheap country.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -182 months ago

        Well you could also live in some Podunk in Atlanta… Honestly I could see purchasing property in frequently traveled areas… Even if you just have an RV in some lot.

        • Fire Witch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          201 month ago

          Or maybe you should put pressure on a multimillion dollar company to pay their employees a living wage, rather than defend them while blaming the workers

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 months ago

          Lol long term RV parking starts at about $700 a month. I am sure it is more expensive on the east coast. Pretty quickly you are paying about the same as renting a room. And if it is just sitting in an empty lot no way it will be in the same shape as when you left it. Plus why Atlanta, it is not the most dangerous city but it does rank in the bottom 1/3.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -71 month ago

            Atlanta is a huge Delta hub. With the RV thing I was saying that it could be kept in an employee lot at the airport. Then drive to some land.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 month ago

              You are just going to have to trust me on this. That isn’t going to work. Airports are kind of picky about how they let employees park. Also there will be no American airlines flight attendants based out of Atlanta, so they won’t be able to park employee parking. They will have to pay to park and I doubt that they would let you park an RV.

              These flight attendants are literally being paid a poverty wage. Ain’t no hustle and jive that’s going to get around that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 month ago

      You think flight attendants make enough for multiple homes in multiple property tax systems? Did you read the article?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -40
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    but the current rules make it almost impossible for them actually to stage a walkout.

    Good ol Genocide Joe still isn’t doing shit for union workers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 month ago

      Are you serious? Conservatives are not even hiding the fact that if elected they would 100% support israel and russia. Go get a brain

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Let’s say that you vote for trump and even just ten more people die because of his measures: ten people more than with the less aggressive contributions from the democrats. At that point you have directly participated in killing those people. You can find all the excuses you want but that’s the crude reality.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              If you say that voting trump means stopping the genocide it’s clear that we are not having an honest conversation. You are a troll and I’m not wasting any nore time around you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                You keep writing comments like the only choices are voting for Trump or voting for Biden. Voting third party or not voting at all are also options, and neither one as as much blood on my hands as voting for both pro-genocide candidates.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -11 month ago

                  In that case maybe your heart is in the right place but that’s still not a reasonable solution, as de facto there are only two choices and voting for neither or not voting at all is not helping when the risk is enabling a totalitarian regime that literally plans on killing people and eradicating hard-earned freedoms.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Your reading comprehension is failing you. Let me spell it out explicitly for you: I am definitely not voting for Trump. I am not voting for Biden. There are other options.