• Jesus_666@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Laser tanks are impractical. What if the enemy wears mirrored shades? That laser goes right back and kills you instead. You don’t want your 100 million dollar tank to be taken out by a pair of Ray-Bans.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The US military has in the past used some large vehicle mounted beam weapons that make your skin burn like all hell, such as the Active Denial System, and I wonder if those could be deflected as well or if they’re the part of the spectrum that needs more sophisticated shielding?

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Those aren’t lasers, they’re millimeter-wave radio beams.

        Yes, they can be deflected pretty easily, but you’ll need metal shield that’s big enough to entirely hide behind.

  • Norgur@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    6 months ago

    I only we had something we could fire that do almost the same arc as that. That would be ballin’! So I’d call it ballistics

    • neo@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ridiculous! You would basically need the mass of a planet for that to work.

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          You fools. Look up!

          It’s not a “moonshot,” it’s a 360 no-scope.

    • Pringles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      That would work if the earth wasn’t flat. As it is, you need to transport the artillery below their position and shoot them from there. Like Ender shooting through the ice clouds.

    • Socsa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is why certain Army weapons are not appropriate for the Marines

    • Seraph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      …the color of a blaster bolt (character-scale or starship scale) is determined by the quality of the gas used in it - higher quality gives you green, lower quality gives you red. The Rebellion didn’t have access to the highest quality gas, and had to make do with the lower quality ammunition.

      Huh, I guess I wondered but never looked it up until now.

      • TurtlePower@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, that’s how it was retconned, but it was originally just so viewers could tell if it was the good guys or bad guys shooting. Just like there were only supposed to be blue (good guys) and red (bad guys) lightsabers. As the Star Wars universe and lore expanded, things got retconned and added/changed/removed, and it’s still happening with the new stuff that comes out. Isn’t world-shaping neat?

  • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    If you fire a laser against a mirror, it bounces but raises the heat of the mirror so you end up melting the mirror and destroying the drone.

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 months ago

      I may risk being too credible here, but a $80 drone is a lot more expendable than a $40m laser tank. The drone can be considered a consumable. Hell, mark the drones down as ammo.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Depending on how long you do it, how powerful the laser, and how quickly it can cool off at the same time.

      And like the other guy said, you can make really good mirrors if you only care about one wavelength.

    • Jumuta
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      not if you have total internal reflection

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        In all seriousness, wavelength-specific dielectric mirrors can approach six nines of reflectivity.

        The hard part is hitting the mirror instead of the drone.

        • Socsa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          And keeping the mirror surface clean

          • mindbleach
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah I guess you can’t pulse-ablate a mirror made of plastic.

            Though it invites a backup strategy of spraying your enemies with molten drone.

  • HackerJoe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Mirrors melt and break when hit with a laser of more than “pretty lights power”.
    This dude built a 2kW one with optics: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNmbvaUzC8Q
    mirror at ~ 4:30

    EDIT: I know where I am, that video is too good not to share though. Vote away.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 months ago

      Inverse square law is just a geometric limitation, focus your lasers more, problem solved.

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        “You see, men, the lethal range is limited by this airy disk… stop giggling!

  • verity_kindleM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    We don’t need Sky Ranger, mirrorbois or lasertank, we have shitballoons.

  • Socsa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    This was a real concept for the anti-ICMB 747. The idea was to loiter it outside air defense range and then send drones in as reflectors to target the lasers much closer to the threat.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Interesting! Yeah, I think in the right atmospheric conditions this could absolutely work.

      Why it’s NCD, as drawn, is that shells already exist and do exactly this when fired on an indirect arc.

  • mindbleach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Alternately, polish every car window facing east.

    Or… skip a step. Line of sight is irrelevant if your aircraft is already exploding!

    • verity_kindleM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s a building in central London that melted a car. Solar laser, so SEO friendly, so on fleek.