• Tar_Alcaran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’d think making a big clamp is easier than making a rocket…

  • threelonmusketeersM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Wow, that’s wild!

    Space Pioneer issued its own statement later, stating there was a structural failure at the connection between the rocket body and the test bench.

    Sounds like the hold-down clamps failed. Have there been any previous cases in history where static fires unexpectedly turned into non-static fires?

    • ValenThyme@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      3 months ago

      well there was that incident in '86 when the shuttle Atlantis was ‘accidentally’ launched with 4 kids aboard during an engine test. The documentary about it called Space Camp is riveting.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        3 months ago

        Few people know that one of those kids was now famous actor, Joaquin Phoenix. I watched that documentary many times and was shock to find out that people speak in a type of slow motion when in zero G.

      • Jumuta
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        it’s fiction lmao

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It means the rocket was just too good for those clamps

    • threelonmusketeersM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      CNSA would be “Temu NASA”.

      Space Pioneer is more like “Temu SpaceX”. Their aforementioned Tianlong-3 rocket is pretty much a Falcon 9 clone.

    • Socsa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bruh why the fuck are they doing this in the suburbs

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was thinking the same thing. You can kind of figure out the distance from the time the rocket disappears behind the cloud/hill to the time you hear the explosion in the second video. The rocket disappears at 41 seconds and the explosion is heard at 49.5 seconds. Even if the rocket had hit the ground as soon as it disappeared from sight we’re talking 2-3 kilometers away.

        • threelonmusketeersM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          Even if the rocket had hit the ground as soon as it disappeared from sight we’re talking 2-3 kilometers away.

          That seems uncomfortably close, especially given this statement:

          The rocket’s onboard computer automatically shut down the engines and the rocket fell 1.5 kilometers southwest.

          I assume they mean 1.5 km from the test stand? If the rocket had flown a bit further, or in a different direction, it could have fallen in what looks to be a rather densely populated area.

          • BigFig@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 months ago

            Wouldn’t be the first time. China drops debris and rocket stages on populated areas all the time

              • threelonmusketeersM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                rocket fuel, which isn’t great for pretty much anything alive

                Depends on the rocket fuel.

                • Methalox: Harmless gases. Methane is a greenhouse gas, but it’s not toxic. Basically like a bunch of cows burping.
                • Kerolox: Kerosene is an oily liquid, so not great for the environment, but not highly toxic.
                • Hypergolics: Hydrazine derivatives and nitrogen tetroxide are both highly toxic.

                The Tianlong-3 in this article uses kerolox. The Long March 2C booster which fell near a village last week uses hypergols.

                • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yeah, primarily hypergolics are the fun ones. I didn’t hear about the booster that fell near a village recently, but there was one that I think had an emergency dump over some village or town a few years ago.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    “No casualties were found.”

    Nice.

    On the positive side, they really stuck the landing.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Their rockets fly even when you try to not let them fly.

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’d figure that would have learned from Boeing and used a whole shitload of fasteners…