sh.itjust.works
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months ago

Conversing with Mathematicians

mander.xyz

message-square
45
link
fedilink
365

Conversing with Mathematicians

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months ago
message-square
45
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    183
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    What about plain old x = -10?

    -10 ^ 2 = 100
    -10 ^ 3 = -1000
    -10 ^ 5 = -100000

    • Redacted@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      122
      ·
      10 months ago

      Isn’t that the joke?

    • enkers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s what he wrote, I imagine.

      • Siethron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        10 months ago

        It is, but with imaginary numbets

        • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          numbet

          • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            numberwang

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      10 months ago

      i² = -1 so…

    • dwindling7373@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      10 months ago

      10 * i^2 is -10.

      • Abracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        of course, but this problem is solvable without any understanding of complex numbers, and 10*i^2 is a really clunky, multi-operation expression whereas -10 is just an integer.

        simplifying one’s answers is standard practice and any grader who received the answer in the OP would be obligated to point out that while technically correct, they’re missing the basic fact that the answer is -10.

        The Rube Goldberg comment is apt as the solution is absurdly complicated and overengineered for the task it performs.

        • dwindling7373@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes that’s what the thing you are looking at is built upon.

    • thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nothing gets past you eh?

      • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        people being pedantic showoffs doesn’t really register as humor for me, TBH

        • thedudeabides@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s true, the OOP is being quite snarky with their comment on a post where someone’s had a genuine basic doubt

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah exactly you’re right, why overcomplicate the problem like the Reddit comment did? I guess that’s just typical Reddit thinking that being pendantic and using lots of fancy words and long explanations makes you smart.

      • Krauerking@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nah just boiler plate autism.

        • Abracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          no

    • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      That was my immediate thought too.

    • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Boooooring

  • Deebster@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    10 months ago

    When all you have is an imaginary hammer, everything looks like a rotation around the imaginary unit circle.

    Explanation of maths

    x = -10, i = √-1 so i² = -1 and 10i²=-10

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Found the math but no explanation.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The squareroot of 100 is ±10.

        • OozingPositron@feddit.cl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          The square root is always positive, but you can plug it into the quadratic formula to get the two possible values.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            10 months ago

            Okay, fine the square roots of 100 are ±10.

            • Eheran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Seems very inaccurate the we can only determine the square root to ±10.

          • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            There’s no reason to bring the quadratic formula into this. Square roots can be negative, but when talking about the square root it’s normally assumed to be the principal square root, which is the positive one.

          • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Nope. To clarify, square roots are the opposite of squaring.

            Now ask yourself:

            What is 10² ?

            What is (-10)² ?

            If you get the same answer, then they are both the roots of the answer. +10 and -10 then gets together called ±10

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wait, isn’t x just -10 if x^3 is not 1000?

    • bi_tux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      yes, it is

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    that is a very long way to write -10

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    My brain

    It hurts

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s because the explanation was about 10 times as complicated as it needs to be

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Math pun intended?

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      He is trolling with overcomplicating

  • Yaysuz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    What an extremely unnecessary explanation. As a math teacher I would have deducted points for this answer.

    • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      “show your work”

      Malicious compliance intensifies

    • Razzazzika@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unless I was in that clas where we had to write mathematical proofs. I HATED those. Sure, you solved the question but write out this complicated reason for why your answer is the correct answer.

  • Ravi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    No definition what values are suitable for x.

    • quicksand@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 months ago

      x has to be -10, right? Or am I missing something?

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, I think the point is that the person answering was wrong/over complicating. If x=10i, then x^2 would be -100 (or potentially -10 depending on what you think the ^2 is applied to).

        • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          10 months ago

          They said x=10i^2, not 10i. Difference is it equals -10, and they chose not to simplify.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’re correct, it’s just overcomplicated as fuck in ways that are correct but completely irrelevant to the question.

      • WolfLink
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        The answer in the meme (10i^2) is -10

      • Ravi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Depends on what are the allowed values for x are. Real numbers, complexe numbers, binary or I made up my own numbers ;)

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      import math

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • [email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Biology and Life Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • !reptiles and [email protected]

Physical Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • !self [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Memes

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]

Miscellaneous

  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.18K users / day
  • 3.03K users / week
  • 8.94K users / month
  • 22.3K users / 6 months
  • 846 local subscribers
  • 14.6K subscribers
  • 4.6K Posts
  • 112K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org