35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called “Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji”.

F that

  • Chozo
    link
    fedilink
    2211 month ago

    I don’t mind there being an emoji for cryptocurrency. It’s a relevant thing in modern society whether we like it or not, so there’s no reason it should be excluded. But just not Bitcoin, specifically. Even though Bitcoin is the one that kicked off crypto, it’s still a brand name, which would result in auto-rejection according to the Unicode Consortium’s guidelines.

    If there was a more general-purpose icon/symbol that could represent cryptocurrency in general, that’d be more appropriate. But it can’t be Bitcoin.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 month ago

      I wouldn’t think Bitcoin has, or can, be trademarked or copyrighted, as it is an open-source protocol/technology where even the creator is unknown?

      Either way there isn’t a generic symbol for cryptocurrency. This emoji will go the way of the save icon, where in a couple generations most people will have no idea what it relates to, but know that it’s a symbol for cryptos.

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I wouldn’t think Bitcoin has, or can, be trademarked or copyrighted, as it is an open-source protocol/technology where even the creator is unknown?

        It’s still the name of a specific product/service. The issue is partly trademark/copyright, but also partly a matter of neutrality. The Unicode Consortium want to ensure that they’re not directly or indirectly endorsing any specific products. If they added a Bitcoin logo, then you’d see every other crypto lining up to get their logos permanently installed on every person’s devices, too. Free advertising for life on 99.99% of phones would be hard to pass up.

        • @ricecake
          link
          English
          221 month ago

          I mean, we have a symbol for effectively any currency that anyone can or wants to fill out the paperwork for and can demonstrate the basics of “this is a meaningful symbol with more than transient relevance”.

          They added ₿ in 2016.

          https://www.compart.com/en/unicode/category/Sc

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            121 month ago

            So, if there’s already a symbol in Unicode, the petition doesn’t make any sense. They should ask Google and Apple to display the symbol in the emoji list, with a control character to force it as emoji.

            • @ricecake
              link
              English
              41 month ago

              Totally. It’s double weird, because it’s not a petitionable issue, it’s a form where you make your case and a committee decides, and they already have the symbol and they just seem to want it to be usable like 💲, which isn’t a thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          Surely the Tokyo tower is a specific product then? 🗼It costs money to visit, aren’t the other towers jealous?

          • magic_lobster_party
            link
            fedilink
            121 month ago

            https://unicode.org/emoji/proposals.html#Faulty_Comparison

            The Tokyo Tower🗼(a specific building) does not justify adding the Eiffel Tower.

            Many historical emoji violate current factors for inclusion. Once an emoji is encoded it cannot be removed from the Unicode Standard.

            It was added when Unicode Consortium had different guidelines. They don’t accept specific buildings anymore.

            Under automatically declined:

            Specific buildings, structures, landmarks, or other locations, whether fictional, historic, or modern.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          -11 month ago

          It’s a specific type of thing, but it’s not a brand. Nobody owns the trademark for Bitcoin. Anyone can buy, sell, or mine Bitcoin. It’s no more a specific product than dollars are a specific product.

          If they added a Bitcoin logo, then you’d see every other crypto lining up to get their logos permanently installed on every person’s devices, too.

          Is there a problem with that? This isn’t “advertising”, these are unicode symbols. There are unicode symbols for all kinds of things. Every currency has unicode symbols, why not cryptocurrencies?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        The creator of bitcoin is as unknown as batman’s identity. The folks at the center of the main blockchain companies and stuff like that all know pretty well who created it, they just play along with the story.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 month ago

            Oh, there is. But while they keep this game up, there’s still plausible deniability for everything.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              If whoever invented Bitcoin is still on this earth, they have a bit of a conundrum. Since we can track all transactions, and we know roughly how long Satoshi was mining the first bitcoins before other people got involved, those early accounts are sitting on over 1 million BTC. Even after today’s dump, that’s still over $50 billion. And for reference, the Koch family is 25th on Forbe’s infamous list, estimated to be worth about $56B. So that person is one of the richest people on the planet.

              However, those coins continue to remain unspent. And once they are moved in any transaction, the entire world will know. That leads to an inherent assumption that those 1M coins (out of 21M that can ever exist) must be irretrievably lost (due to their private keys being deleted), so most have taken that out of the active supply when estimating BTC value. Once they are moved, the price will probably crash – at least 5%, but more likely much more than that. He is among the richest people in the world on paper, but if he moves any of it his wealth will collapse.

              However, one doesn’t have to move coins to prove they own them. Anyone with the private keys could cryptographically sign a message saying “I am Satoshi” with one of the early keys and immediately have 100% credibility. The fact that this hasn’t happened means that those keys likely not longer exist. (I, personally, think Hal Finney took those keys to the grave with him, and Craig Wright is a big fat liar.)

              • @AlDente
                link
                English
                21 month ago

                No single wallet has even close to 1 million Bitcoins. It’s a public block chain and you can find a list of the largest wallets in a website like this: https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-richest-bitcoin-addresses.html

                Also, regarding the unfair advantage of the genesis block, Bitcoin’s code was actually written in a way that prevents this balance from being transfered. It’s forever locked in the wallet at this address: 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  True, the Genesis Block is fixed, but it’s speculated that Satoshi did most of the mining during Bitcoin’s initial experiment. I have seen estimates online that the first 22k blocks were mined almost exclusively by Satoshi, all to different BTC addresses, 50 BTC each. Worth practically nothing back then but worth over 2.5M today. Every 10 minutes or so, Satoshi found another one.

    • magic_lobster_party
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      The problem with having cryptocurrency as emoji is agreeing on the specification how it should be drawn, and also make it different enough from already existing emojis such as coin 🪙. It is not exactly a tangible thing.

      • @Corkyskog
        link
        English
        -41 month ago

        Just make it the B symbol they use in the coin? None of the others would exist in their current fashion, without Bitcoin anyway.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          Bitcoin is a brand name there which means they can’t do that. Also if bitcoin deserves its own symbol (and I don’t think it necessarily does) then all the cryptocurrencies such as ethereum also deserve one.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Windows wouldn’t have existed without DOS so it’s logo should be the DOS logo. Likewise the USD emoji should be a pile of gold. \s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I don’t think it should have an emoji either, but how does this rule apply to real currencies being emojis? I mean there is dollar banknote 💵 and yen banknote 💴 and euro banknote 💶 as separate emojis, not just a general money one. And honestly, even most of the emojis referencing anything that has to do with money uses dollar signs, i.e. $. Were these rules made after these emojis were already added?

      • Chozo
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        I saw this get brought up a lot. I think the difference is that currency symbols generally don’t refer to a specific currency. USD and AUS both use the $ symbol, for example. “Dollar” and “American Dollar” aren’t the same thing since other types of dollars exist, and the symbols are still technically multi-purpose, whereas the ₿ symbol technically refers only to Bitcoin.

        That’s my theory on the reasoning, at least.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      Why in the world would you have “emojis” as part of Unicode anyway?

      We already have a way to have endless “emojis” without administrative stupidity, it’s called JPEG.

      If you need to show text as that, we’ve had smileys since 90s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        271 month ago

        Would you rather send an entire JPEG over text message for an emoji? Or just 4 bytes of unicode right inline where you want it? Unicode having a standard set of emoji is actually incredibly useful and reduces complexity. I guess it would disincentivize 👏 emoji 👏 spam 👏 to use JPEGs tho.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          I’d send :-} and :-\ and =P and D= instead of an emoji. As the founding fathers intended.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            There’s even more use cases that come up, like being able to use emoji and other fancy symbols anywhere unicode is supported. So you can even program with them. People have taken that idea to the extreme just for fun: https://www.emojicode.org/

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -41 month ago

              Other special symbols are a different thing. For APL language or others.

              They are useful, provided you have them on your keyboard or you have configurable extra keys.

              Symbols specifically for emoji - I mean, people can do what they want with code space, even if I’d rather see another obscure alphabet standardized there. Medieval Armenian or Russian musical notation, for example. Something real .

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                How aren’t emoji “real”?

                This just comes across as “old man yells at cloud” to me tbh.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11 month ago

        Hmm, why do we need a corporation to be arbitter of the written language anyway ? If they want to use it, they should just use it.If they can’t because of some central authority then Unicode is is to be abolished and replace with a system where you can usev wherever squiggle that you want and nobody gets a second opinion. You just do it.

    • qaz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -21 month ago

      It makes a lot more sense to implement this the way country flags are implemented in Unicode.

  • magic_lobster_party
    link
    fedilink
    1001 month ago

    We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji. These are also brands that are heavily ingrained in our culture. Probably even more so than Bitcoin.

    Or we accept that brands like Bitcoin shouldn’t use emoji as a marketing tool.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Probably even more so

      probably? shitcoin isn’t even in the same ballpark universe as something like McDonald’s or Pepsi.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -11
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yeah McDonalds is based on torturing and murdering animals while destroying the planet… While bitcoin is only destroying the planet like the rest of capitalism.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      We also need a McDonald’s emoji, Pepsi emoji, Windows emoji and Mastercard emoji

      bitcoin is not a company.

      • magic_lobster_party
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Unicode Consortium decide which emoji should be included. It’s up to each vendor themselves to come up with how they should look like. I don’t think Unicode Consortium explicitly state it must look like McDonald’s fries.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 month ago

          No. But the description of the Emoji is French Fries in a red carton.

          Now I can’t be absolutely certain only McDonald’s sells french fries in a red carton, nor do I know if red french fry cartons are trademarked (answers to these questions evaded simple websearches) but I have never seen french fries sold in red cartons outside of McDonald’s.

          If you do find non-McDonald’s french fries sold in a red carton, please point them out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 month ago

      Since when is Bitcoin a brand lmao? I’m really struggling to see how it is comparable to McDonald’s or Windows. Having a logo does not make you a corporation

      • magic_lobster_party
        link
        fedilink
        281 month ago

        The Bitcoin logo is the brand. Corporations like exchanges use this brand to market their services.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -8
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Bitcoin is digital money. A better analogy would be to campaign for a USD, Yen, euro or British pound emoji.

      Oh wait, they already exist.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 month ago

          I agree with you.

          I’m not really arguing for a bitcoin emoji. Just against the McDonald’s brand comparison.

          BTC is not mainstream enough (and never will be) to be needed in everyday text speak.

          • poo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s also a scam. But those who fell for it and NFTs want to downtown cuz mad

      • @conciselyverbose
        link
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Except those are real currencies the world recognizes.

        Most businesses will tell you to fuck off if you try to pay them in bitcoin.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 month ago

          Most businesses will tell you to fuck off if you try to pay them in bitcoin.

          Yes and no. You can indirectly pay for things in Bitcoin using a Bitcoin credit card. Although I’m not sure why you would want to.

          • @conciselyverbose
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            It’s not “paying in bitcoin” if you have a random third party on your side converting it to a currency that isn’t a joke.

      • magic_lobster_party
        link
        fedilink
        291 month ago

        The logo and name is the brand. How do you visually represent a specific payment protocol without using its logo? There’s no emoji for HTTP or TCP either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          I’m actually for the idea of emojis for protocols. Not Bitcoin specifically because I don’t think it has long term potential as a deflationary virual asset, but block chain? Sure.

        • KⒶMⒶLⒶ WⒶLZ 2Ⓐ24
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -41 month ago

          while there may not be an emoji for http, maybe there should be. there is sort of an unofficial one (a broken lock), and there are other protocols that have logos. as another commenter said, it’s kind of silly to fight for an emojii for it, and probably sillier to fight against it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 month ago

            while there may not be an emoji for http, maybe there should be.

            No God, Please No!

            We don’t need another gzip or bzip2 logo. Lol

            • Mubelotix
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              You think you can fool people by using a simple straw man argument technique? Come on, get your shit together. Bitcoin is infrastructure as anyone can submit transactions to the network and they will be seamlessly processed. As simple as that

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -41 month ago

                I know that shouting “straw man!” is the first step of trying to deflect from being wrong on the Internet… But if you’re going to do it, at least know what a straw man is.

                My argument is that “Infrastructure” != “anyone can do it”.

                Infrastructure is something that benefits and maintains the general public. Bitcoin benefits a handful of cryptobros, billionaires… and most importantly ransomware rings.

                • Mubelotix
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Your straw man is “shit in their pants”

                  Read your own comments dude

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 month ago

                Putting significant energy into campaigning against it? Sure. But what’s silly about saying “this is a stupid idea and shouldn’t happen”?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    40
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Short reminder that Bitcoin was created as a reaction on the world finance crisis and to allow people like Assange to receive donations, because PayPal and similar just blocked them…

    That does not mean that Botcoin is perfect, but: If the alternative system was perfect, there was not bitcoin.

    Now, do we need an emoji? I don’t care TBH…

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      I don’t mind a system like bitcoin existing but bitcoin itself has way too many problems to be useful and actually is detrimental to the environment. It takes way too long to process a transaction, it is massively energy intensive for what it is, and it’s been hyped up like the Californian gold Rush.

      Sure it was created to solve a problem but it doesn’t actually solve that problem very effectively. It also introduces an infinite number of new problems that no other currency system has ever experienced.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        It also introduces an infinite number of new problems that no other currency system has ever experienced.

        Infinite problems, eh? Can you name like 10?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Bitcoin is terrible for that though. High transaction fees, slow transaction speeds, everyone can see your balances and transactions (and with KYC requirements it’s very easy to link a wallet and a coin to a person).

      Monero is the only digital currency worth having.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Monero is great. Except for the fact that when the dev team dislikes what miners are doing, they introduce a new arbitrary rule, and everyone just goes with it. Having a process to introduce such changes unilaterally is a bug that needs to be fixed first.

        Also, there’s a lightning network which allows you to transact bitcoin fast and cheap. Although the privacy aspect is still not solved there.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 month ago

      This is like saying “laws aren’t always enforced equally, so we should have no laws whatsoever”. Bitcoin is not a helpful response.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        I think, whether it’s helpful is an individual decision. E.g. for people in Turkey, it’s a lot more stable than their own currency. Same logic for probably dozens of other countries…

        Maybe, it’s not useful for you, but that’s OK. No one is trying to replace your currency with it and force you to use it.

        • @[email protected]
          cake
          OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Bitcoin’s “value” in USD terms has dropped ~20% in the last few days, so I’m not sure we can call it ‘stable’

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            In 1998 the USD fell like 20% vs the yen, currencies don’t always stay the same value vs. other currencies

            • @[email protected]
              cake
              OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Bitcoin regularly loses 85% of its “value” vs USD

              85%

              This has happened multiple times

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                The swings were bigger when the market cap was smaller, this is usually the case. The market cap of the yen is much bigger still.

                • @[email protected]
                  cake
                  OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  Turns out you’re right, BTC price only went down 77% from the 2021 peak, my mistake /s

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Turkey’s currency dropped 83% in the last 5 years and 94% in 10 years (per USD). And by the way: It dropped and did not rise the same amount ever again…

                Why can’t we just agree that different people might have different views whether it’s useful for them?

                Is it more stable compared to USD? No. Is it more stable compared to dozens of other currencies? Yes.

                I think, there are very good arguments against BTC, for example the energy consunption… But whether it’s too risky for you or not… That’s highly subjective IMO. There is no country on this planet with only BTC as official currency. So, no one is forced to hold 100% of their total money in BTC.

                • @[email protected]
                  cake
                  OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  So the argument is no longer “Bitcoin provides stability” or whatever, but instead is, “it’s no more unstable than the world’s most unstable national currency”?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Emoji? Why not unicode character like $ or €?

    Edit: Dear OP, please stop popularizing these ₿rat’s marketing ideas

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 month ago

    Cryptocurrency is speedrunning ruining everything. We might as well have a laugh at the cryptobros’ expense in the meantime.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 month ago

      I loved the concept at first, the idea of a decentralized currency all handled by encryption, and transactions permamently stored in a public ledger for all to see.

      Then the cryptobros and the scammers caught wind of it and it’s all downhill from there.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 month ago

        If you want the name of a payment techology that isn’t snake oil, isn’t blockchain-based, isn’t a cult, doesn’t claim to be a currency, doesn’t work on proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, but actually does provide certain privacy guarantees for your basic purchasing needs, is cryptographically secure, and can be used with only FOSS, I recommend looking into GNU Taler.

        The only downside is that it’s not really supported anywhere at all yet. But I do hope it becomes a real thing some day.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The only downside is that it’s not really supported anywhere at all yet. But I do hope it becomes a real thing some day.

          AFAIK there’s a lot of talk about making GNU Taler the basis for the ‘digital Euro’ which is curently being debated at the EU Parliement.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Yea, that is interesting! I don’t really understand a lot of it though. Wonder how censorship-resistant it can be, and whether the receiver would be able to cash it out anonymously.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            I’m not an expert on it, but I’ve done a certain amount of study on it.

            I’m pretty sure there are no privacy guarantees for money receivers. Merchants/sellers would still be identifiable by banks and governments and such. So Taler isn’t what anyone selling heroin or doing murder for hire would want to be using as an accepted payment method. (At least not any more so than credit/debit card transactions will help the seller with keeping their doings secret.)

            But Taler can keep the buyers’ identity secret. Unless you’re doing things in ways that reveal information about yourself, your bank and your government wouldn’t know you were buying fursuits even if they knew the merchant was selling fursuits.

            So all that to say that no, the merchant couldn’t cash out anonymously.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              What I don’t understand is whether it is like “Taler is obtained and cashed out only in a bank, but the link between two events is unknown” or if Taler can change hands during said “link”.

              If the former - I really hope it gets implemented as a card replacement, but it would need to coexist with something like Monero (which is what I use now) that is more akin to cash. But I really hope that somehow non-blockchain full-on “digital cash” could one day be invented, so wonder if this could be it :)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                How I understand it is:

                • You go to your bank (or use a webapp or whatever) who knows who you are and get them to initiate a withdrawl from your bank account to your Taler wallet in the amount of, say $100.
                • The balance in your Taler wallet goes up by $100. The bank also decrements your bank account by $100 and puts that $100 in an escrow holding intending to pay it to whatever recipient(s) can provide cryptographic proof that you gave them Taler.
                • You go to a merchant and pay out of that $100 Taler balance $9 for a cheeseburger and fries.
                • The merchant receives $9 in Taler from you and checks with your bank that that $9 hasn’t already been spent previously before concluding the payment process and giving you your receipt and burger.
                • You now have a burger and fries and your Taler balance is $91.
                • But the merchant doesn’t learn anything about your identity in the process. But they do have proof that your bank has $9 in escrow earmarked for them (the merchant) specifically.
                • And your bank doesn’t know which of their customers to which they’ve ever given Taler is the one buying from the merchant in question. They just know that of the total sum of Taler they’ve issued that hasn’t been collected yet, $9 is earmarked for such-and-such merchant/burger joint.
                • The merchant can settle up any time, but theoretically the bank can charge per-transaction fees. In order to minimize fees, it behooves the merchant to batch up settlements. The merchant can claim actual USD for every dollar that was used at that establishment by customers via Taler over, say, the last week or whatever in one big settlement batched transaction.

                I’m leaving out some details, but that should give you a decent idea of how things work with Taler.

                Now, as for this bit:

                if Taler can change hands during said “link”.

                That, I’m not sure of. It might be that you can transfer Taler from your wallet to someone else’s wallet (that they could then spend) without any identities being revealed, though they wouldn’t be able to get real USD or whatever without working with your bank which would generally insist on confirming their identity. But I’d think in order for the recipient in that situation to know that they actually had real Taler and not Taler that you had already spent and that wouldn’t actually work if they tried to spend it or cash it in, they’d have to make basically an API call to your bank, though unless the bank blocked all traffic from every VPN and traffic anonymizer (like Tor or I2p) in existence, I see no reason why it couldn’t be done in a way that preserved the recipient’s anonymity.

                So yeah. Not sure. But even if that bit isn’t a thing, I still want Taler to take off.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  Ah, so probably would not work to evade censorship/sanctions. I would REALLY love to use such a thing instead of my card though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -31 month ago

          GNU Taller is pretty fragile, though. One bank issues unbacked tokens and the credibility of the whole system goes down the drain. It’s the current financial system, just rebranded. Also, it promotes taxation which automatically makes it a cult & scam.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            One bank issues unbacked tokens

            1. The Taler protocol has bank auditors built-in.
            2. Your hypothetical would just as much apply to existing debit cards.
            3. Unbacked tokens. You mean like Tether? (Let alone Terra.)

            Also, it promotes taxation which automatically makes it a cult & scam?

            The fuck? How does Taler “promote taxation?”

            Fuckin’ Libertarians.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -11 month ago

              Unbacked tokens. You mean like Tether?

              Exactly like Tether. USDT was never backed 1:1 by USD. They don’t even try to deny it anymore. They admit it’s backed by “various assets, including BTC”, which smells like a market manipulation.

              How does Taler promote taxation?

              “Customers can stay anonymous, but merchants can not hide their income through payments with GNU Taler. This helps to avoid tax evasion and money laundering.”

        • @index
          link
          English
          -31 month ago

          isn’t blockchain-based, doesn’t work on proof-of-work or proof-of-stake

          These things weren’t introduced as a gimmick they are used to solve specific problems.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -91 month ago

          Please describe how I can send the money to my mom in Russia (disconnected from SWIFT) with GNU Taler today. I’ll wait.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 month ago

            I don’t know how I could possibly have been more explicit about it not yet being ready for any real-world use cases than I was.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -81 month ago

              It will never be ready. It doesn’t even make sense. To transact with real fiat like the US dollar, you’ll have to go through an official on-ramp and an off-ramp of the respective government. And to do an international transaction you’ll have to use one of the widely accepted systems like SWIFT. GNU Taler doesn’t appear to address anything like that. Anyhow, my comment was made with the premise of this whole thread in mind, i.e. “Bitcoin is stupid” or “snake oil”. Yet there’s no alternatives to what crypto provides. So is it that stupid after all?

              • @explodicle
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                How wasteful!

                Anyhow, today I’m going to resume using a currency backed by oil and nukes, which encourages consumption on purpose. I will then either exploit workers by investing in a for-profit business, or get poorer.

                But someday, in the future, economics will work the way I expect them to. That’s when I’ll switch to something better!

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  Russia has had oil and nukes and it didn’t stop the ruble from collapsing in the 90s

                  Maybe reexamine your assumptions

          • @index
            link
            English
            -21 month ago

            lol the downvotes. your mom is clearly evil and doesn’t deserve any money

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 month ago

        Scammers use the technology because it actually works and does what it says it does. And criminals and scammers and such are generally the first ones to adopt a new technology. Such as bank robbers adopting the automobile in order to get away faster.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 month ago

        I liked the idea for awhile as well. But for me, learning about the “proof of work” underpinning is what changed my mind. That - and the fact that cryptocurrency does not actually have any of the strengths that it claims to have. It’s definitely and interesting idea… but in practice it’s all just scams and incentivised waste.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          That’s interesting. I’ve initially written it off as a scam. Until I’ve learned about the proof-of-work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Did they or did a bunch of media get pushed that told us all what these crypto bros were doing like shitting on beaches and taking our jobs.

        Seriously though I’m picking up on a trend that a lot media has a greater influence on opinion then I’ve ever seen before

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      41 month ago

      Bitcoin is over 15 years old now, that’s not a particularly fast speedrun.

    • @index
      link
      English
      01 month ago

      I would rather point my finger at wall street or financial institutions not at the tools that offers a viable option to avoid these

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 month ago

    This will likely be rejected for one the same reasons that they decided they would not add any new flag emojis. Flags come and go. Bitcoin hasn’t even been around for 20 years yet, and its future is highly uncertain.

    Also, considered as a currency, it would be better as a regular text character, not an emoji. Like $, €, ¥, £, etc.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 month ago

      I actually don’t mind it being added as a text character because then I can actually use it. Using it as an emoji is useless to everyone other than the crypto bros that want to spam it on Twitter.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 month ago

          I don’t know about strictly “unable” but there are a million contexts where it is a bad idea and simply not done. Like a spreadsheet or financial document. Or anywhere you want your text to behave like text — with a consistent font, color, style, etc. The difference between $ (text) and 💲 (emoji) is pretty stark in most contexts.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 month ago

            For example, on the dark background of the UI I am viewing your comment on, The $ symbol is in white colour (as the font has been set).

            But the emoji is dark grey, and wouldn’t be visible if I had a cheap, low contrast monitor.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              For me it looks like this:

              So the text one appears the same for both of us but the emoji one appears differently which could possibly change its meaning if they were different enough

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                Probably because the emoji fonts don’t change their colour with the font.color, which normal characters do.

                And your browser is using a different font from mine

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Emoji are only supported in rich text formatted documents they’re not actual text. If I type a Euro symbol it’s a Euro symbol it’s not a picture of a Euro symbol depending on context it’s the actual Euro symbol. If I ask a computer what symbol it is the computer can tell me it’s a Euro symbol, it doesn’t go, ooh I don’t know it’s a picture.

          € 💶

          One renders consistently irrespective of device viewing the other is entirely dependent of device viewing. Go look at this post on different devices and see the problem

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      Technically, emoji doesn’t even have specific flags, they just have country codes, conforming to the ISO list - actually choosing which flags will be included is up to the individual implemeters. Regional flags got a little bit complicated because they need to establish the conventions first.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 month ago

    Suggestion: We do with the Bitcoin emoji what people did with the eggplant emoji. The B stands for butthole. So now we can do [eggplant emoji] [bitcoin emoji].

    I’m sure the TOTALLY NOT HOMOPHOBIC tech bros will love it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 month ago

    fighting for bitcoin to get an emoji is stupid, but fighting against it might be even stupider. surely there are more important things to spend your time and energy on. it’s a fucking emoji. who cares?

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 month ago

      normalizing scams, by laundering their image via standards organizations, pollutes our communications environment. Both an emoji and a petition are symbolic - and our symbols are in fact important.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -241 month ago

        Bitcoin isn’t a scam. All non-bitcoin cryptocurrencies are scams.

        People often hear about stuff like coins that are pre-mined, or proof-of-stake and the schemes and scans that come out of those, and immediately associate Bitcoin with the same thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          171 month ago

          That is also not 100% true. There are several altcoins with fantastic utility. Monero and Ethereum come to mind.

          • @sugar_in_your_tea
            link
            English
            101 month ago

            Exactly. Most cryptocurrencies are scams, but a handful are fantastic. Ethereum is cool for being proof-of-stake (so no high-energy mining), and Monero is cool for being super privacy-oriented. There are a handful more, but honestly, if you stick with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Monero, you’ll be fine.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              That’s pretty much exactly my thought. I hold a very very small amount in Polygon, but only in order to pay the gas fees for the Polygon network. So I never have more than a few US dollars worth in it at a time.

              • @sugar_in_your_tea
                link
                English
                21 month ago

                Yeah, I basically just do Monero, and I use it as a spend account and use it anywhere it’s accepted. I don’t invest in any cryptocurrencies because I don’t think cryptocurrencies have positive expected return (it’s all hype), so I keep the amount of crypto I have small.

          • Mubelotix
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 month ago

            Ethereum has scam characteristics though. The creator Vitalik gave himself time to mine it alone before giving public access. He secured for himself quite a nice stash

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              That’s true. I suspect the application programming is the only reason that it actually took off.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 month ago

          Of course bitcoin is a scam. It’s a “currency” you can’t spend anywhere. It’s only purpose is a pump and dump scheme for early adopters.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            It’s a “currency” you can’t spend anywhere.

            You could’ve at least pretended to have done some basic research…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 month ago

            It’s a “currency” you can’t spend anywhere

            Lol

            It’s only purpose is a pump and dump scheme for early adopters.

            This is exactly what many alt-coins are but Bitcoin is decidedly not.

            You’re confusing “easy to mine” with “early adopter scam”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      millions of people who use emojis would constantly see it. It would slowly start to feel more familiar to them and increase its acceptance. If that works, others would try to do the same and we would have every and any company put their logos in. If it doesnt then it doesnt matter that much, but i dont want to risk yet another avenue for corporations to worm into peoples minds.

      Personally i dont care about emojis at all but i do care about general mentalspace.

  • Frank🦁F
    link
    English
    151 month ago

    #bitcoinscam #tetherfraud

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lack of emojis and also having an emoji are both good for bitcoin.

    Being stupid is good for bitcoin too, probably.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 month ago

    It was a mistake that the Unicode people started to add emoji of their own at all ever in the first place.

    My understanding is that emoji were originally added because they existed in other preexisting standards. They should have kept it at that. Now we get public discussions what concepts are important enough to “deserve” emoji, which is a stupid, pointless discussion that could have been avoided if they had not started doing that. We were able to communicate just fine before emoji were a thing.