Summary

Elon Musk’s vocal support for Donald Trump and promotion of far-right conspiracy theories has alienated many Tesla owners, who now express embarrassment over their cars.

Sales of anti-Musk stickers, such as “Anti Elon Tesla Club,” have surged as owners distance themselves from Musk’s politics.

Once admired by liberals for his environmental advocacy, Musk’s alignment with Trump and leadership in his administration have sparked backlash.

While Tesla remains the dominant EV maker, analysts warn Musk’s polarizing image may impact sales as competition grows and Trump plans to cut EV tax incentives.

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I want “I got this before Elon went crazy”

    But I drive a Civic

    I want “I still did, tho” on the other side

    🤣

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    While Tesla remains the dominant EV maker

    Well actually they don’t, they’ve been surpassed by BYD.

    • kerrypacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I rent a lot of cars for work travel and BYDs are nowhere near as nice as Teslas to drive. That will change in time though, and their batteries are already better I believe.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ve only seen one review, I think it was called Dolphin. Overall the car was reviewed as OK to very good for the price here in Denmark, but the handling was awful.
        It shall be interesting to see how well the new LiFePo batteries do, the current gen Blade batteries are allegedly good, but have proven to not be quite as safe as they were supposed to be. Safety was supposed to be a big feature of blade batteries. But in reality, they are only marginally better than other batteries.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes AFAIK BYD is not available in USA, they are in most of the rest of the world though.
        And the Musk shame is not isolated to USA either.

        AFAIK BYD is working on a factory in Mexico, so maybe USA will get them from there in the future?

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          BYD is working on a factory in Mexico

          I love the fact that Chinese companies are outsourcing production to America, now.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Volvo and Polestar are made in Sweden and owned by the Chinese today. Both are pretty popular in EU.

  • MarkG_108@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I myself use a bicycle for local travel, and public transit for longer commutes. Musk’s overpriced EVs are not the solution to global warming, IMO.

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It is a bit more complex than that. EVs are the necessary replacement for use cases where a car is needed. It is far from reality to think, that we are able to life in a world without cars. There are use cases where a car is absolutely required and here EVs are better than gasoline powered ones. However, a lot of people don’t really need one. Especially in the bigger cities it is very easy to live without a car(its also sometimes much faster because when driving in the city you are standing/crawling forwards most of the time)

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        To be honest, it was almost like they tried to prove EV wasn’t feasible, making ridiculously laughable small cars that could only go 60 km/h, and had even worse range. Then they claimed it should be hydrogen, which for a decade went absolutely nowhere. That was until Tesla proved a functional attractive EV was indeed possible.
        I hate Elon Musk, but Tesla was a huge leap forward for fully battery electric cars.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Absolutely, Musk didn’t create the concept or invent anything, he just bought the right thing at the right time. And had some very skillful people working for him. Something only possible if you already have money. Still Tesla struggled early on financially, and he did mange to help Tesla through to success. I don’t think he was as crazy back then as he is now.

        • A7thStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Tesla didn’t even do anything new. They put the right product to market at the right time.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            This is not true, Tesla did a lot of things that were new. They used Lithium batteries, made an electric car that was fast sporty and had long range, instead of the typical “city” electrics. And they built a charging network.
            To say the Tesla wasn’t new, is like saying iPhone wasn’t new, because smartphones already existed.

            • A7thStone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Funny you should mention iPhone, because it was the same thing. Yes the whole package didn’t exist in that form, but all the parts were already in use. They both got lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time.

              Lithium batteries hadn’t been used before because the technology had just reached the point where they were viable for use in a vehicle. Electric motor technology had also just reached the price to performance to size necessary to make a sporty vehicle. The original Tesla was unique for it’s time, but not because of some genius design. They were just lucky enough to be doing it at a time when others tech was reaching the punt that made it possible.

              • watson387@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                The Palm Treo I had when the iPhone came out could do all of the stuff the iPhone could do, but you had to work at it. I miss that phone…

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                16 hours ago

                No that’s not funny, that was on purpose, because all the elements already existed, but nobody had put it together to work nearly as well.
                When iPhone came out, it completely obliterated Blackberry Microsoft and Nokia in the smartphone market. It was so far ahead in design probably about 10 years. So you can’t claim they did nothing new. Please note that I don’t personally use Apple products, because I find their control freak ecosphere policy disgusting, I made that decision already in the early 90’s, and Apple has only gotten worse since, so I haven’t changed my decision not to use their products. But when I saw the presentation of the iPhone and the iPad because I’m a tech nerd, I immediately saw it was a superior product to anything on the market at the time.
                With Tesla it’s very similar, other car makers messed around with embarrassing underwhelming lackluster designs with maybe 40 km range and ugly 2 seater city car format, that could generally only do 60-80 km/h. GM had had a research project with a pretty cool looking car, but it was run at a massive deficit, and was still expensive to buy, and it was still underwhelming.
                The Prius was probably the height of electric even though it was only a hybrid, at the time, and could only do 7km on battery! SAo not much of a hybrid. And Toyota allegedly sold that at a deficit too! Many claimed that what Tesla aimed to do was impossible.
                So no matter how much I despise both Apple and Musk, it must be acknowledged that they were ahead of their time with groundbreaking products.

                Being ahead by about 10 years is not just luck. That takes ingenuity and a lot of clever engineering. Musk was not responsible for either, he just stepped in and bought Tesla at the right time.

                • A7thStone@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  I appreciate that people love to gargle tech Bros, but the truth of the matter is what they were most lucky with was having access to the capital necessary to bring those ideas to market. Do you think Steve Jobs or Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning were the only ones to have the idea to put those technologies together? They were just the ones lucky enough to have the means to do it.

  • explodicle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I prefer to cut off Teslas because nobody is letting me in anyways, and they’ve got automatic safety braking. Yes, my signal is on.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I cut off a Tesla once that cut me off first. Asshole was livid, but deserved it. Didn’t think about the safety braking, but that’s a good point, does the Tesla even let them move if someone is cutting them off or do they just have to sit there and let it happen?

      The collision avoidance can’t be that good though, because some elderly man in a Tesla backed in to me once.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ooh, maybe this means cheaper used Teslas.

    …but then you’d have to drive a Tesla. Shit.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are already people pulling the EV transaxles out of wreaks and putting them in better cars with custom controllers.

        • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 days ago

          Aside from the musk debacle, it’s fun to think about a brand new generation of car enthusiasts hacking and customizing EVs similar to all the current “car guys” are with ICs. I hope it takes off.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve been following Edison Motors and you can buy the EV transaxle from the electric Mustang as a crate engine from Ford with. Edison hasn’t announced being able to buy individual parts, but they support Right to Repair, so once the kits start rolling out, parts should be as well. They’re a startup and are smartly advertising only a few options to keep the new supply chain simple.

    • Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have definitely been considering buying used so that I don’t support Elon. That’s the most important thing to me.

      • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nice thought but unfortunately it still supports new tesla sales by propping up the secondary market.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s assuming someone is selling their old Tesla to buy a new Tesla. Hopefully they won’t. I own one and I wouldn’t buy one again.

  • Yerbouti
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I cant stop laughing when I see a Cybertruck. This is the ultimate insecurity toy and the ugliest car ever made.

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    brainstorms a hellscape situation where a Tesla is regulated into your ownership and every American is forcibly taxed to pay for it

    “THANKS FOR THE FREE CAR BASED ELON”

    ~ Conservatives


    You better keep an eye on that goddamn phone, buddy, I’m calling it next year.

  • Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    2018 he called a diver that saved kids a pedo. Anyone who bought a Tesla after that can get fucked.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      3 days ago

      A year after Tesla was started, he invested into it with shitloads of money.

      Then he sued Tesla for the “right” to be called a “founder”.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      You say that but it’s a pretty recent development that there was any significant alternatives to Tesla in the American EV space. Even now that is one of the only options for buying used at a reasonable price. That is finally starting to change but for a lot of people between 2018 and now the choice was between buying another ICE vehicle or a Tesla. I don’t blame people for overlooking some of Elon’s faults in order to help address climate change, especially since the really crazy side of him wasn’t widely publicized until two-ish years ago.

  • Brodysseus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have a beater 97 Corolla. Don’t care about stuff hitting it one bit. I wanna get some kind of funny sticker that’s like “at least it’s not a Tesla” or something like that

  • ⓝⓞ🅞🅝🅔@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    May impact sales…

    Let’s face it, people seem to be able to tolerate a lot of shit before they ever actually start showing how they feel with their wallets.

    • BigDanishGuy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      IDK about new car figures, but I’m in the market for another EV. I found a Tesla model 3 long range awd that had done about 150k km, and a Renault Zoe with 15k km and 2/3 the range. The Renault is slightly cheaper, but it’s Musk being a loose canon that’s the reason why I’m going with the Zoe instead. Sure it’s a nicer car, if it works, but the fear that Musk get’s high and disables non-essential stuff is too real.

      So in my case Musk has directly affected my used car choice.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Does the Zoe have conventional door handles? Cause the functional design of Tesla’s leaves a lit to be desired anyway.

        • BigDanishGuy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          AFAIK yes, at least I didn’t notice anything strange, and I believe the one I looked at in the comparison (at a dealership) even had a proper keyhole in the driver door.

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh I don’t know, the Budweiser stock hit endured pretty lengthy after being advertised by a non-redneck.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    While Tesla remains the dominant EV maker, …

    BYD has entered the chat.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      3 days ago

      The US will just slap enough tariffs to make them roughly the same price as the competition.

        • xmunk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          3 days ago

          As your Canadian buddy, do you want a hookup? We’ll meet on the border of Alberta and Montana under the moonlight where the moose crows.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        3 days ago

        As is the way of the “free market”. Us automakers aren’t even trying to compete, half their EVS are massive SUVs/trucks instead of smaller, lighter, more effecient designs.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          They are very much competing.You’re just confused about what they’re competing in. It’s profit, not size of vehicle, or efficiency or what have you. The F-150 is still the top selling vehicle in North America. Turns out small vehicles make less profit so they stopped making them and inflated the size of all remaining models.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Do you want a truck too? Or are you the only person capable of resisting the power of auto industry propaganda?

                  The fact that people in different places do not all want the same cars is strong evidence that their wants result from human agency, not auto propaganda.

              • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 days ago

                A want a decent electric sedan/hatchback but here we are.

                A SUV is too big for what I need.

                • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The SUV costs more upfront, costs more to recharge, has larger tires which cost more and pollute more. The costs really add up fast if you are living on a budget.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  The Chevy Bolt, a subcompact EV, has been around since 2016. The Nissan Leaf has been around since 2010.

                  Subcompacts of all types, EV and ICE alike, simply don’t sell as well as trucks in the US.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Which is exactly the same pattern they repeated in the 70s. Which is when Japan ate their lunch.

          This time though is a little different, with China’s vastly lower worker costs, and possible government subsidization in an attempt to corner the world auto market. I can understand and agree with the 100% tariff.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I’d be fine with the tarrif if there was a manufacturer actually trying to compete. Instead it feels like “nooo we can’t have byds cars here, americans need the electric F250 supercab!!!”

            I’d also be fine with the tarrif if there was going to be massive investments in public transit which could reduce the need to own a car and transit tends to be more effecient than even the best EVs and is more fair to more people.

            • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’d be fine with the tarrif if there was a manufacturer actually trying to compete

              What about all the Japanese, Korean, and European brands selling cars here? Is there another market outside of China, where everything is sold well below cost after being built using slave labor and lax environmental regulations, where new cars are as cheap as you want them to be? I think they are competing but the cars are just expensive to build. China is hiding that expense from buyers just long enough for them to try to take over every local market at which time there will be no reason to keep them subsidized because all the competition will be gone.

              • treefrog@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                Everything is getting tariffed that’s not manufactured in the U.S. China is just the highest.

                • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Most of these brands do manufacture in the US, though, and even Ford and GM manufacture in Canada and Mexico. My issue is with people claiming that these tariffs (prior to Trump) are just protectionism for the couple remaining US companies when they’re not. They’re protectionism for the entire US auto market, which mostly consists of foreign brands.

              • Rekorse
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                America uses slave labor in the same way, plus with prisoners, so where’s our ultra cheap EVs? Apparently we need to use our “resources” better.

          • xmunk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think it’s a complicated situation but the legitimate reason for the tariffs (not just Musk shoveling money into Tesla) is that battery production is a strategic interest for drones and other military equipment.

            I think it’s logical we should make sure the US battery industry is able to develop.

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          What about the rest of the industry in the US? I don’t know why people focus on the two remaining US ICE manufacturers and ignore the dozens of other foreign manufacturers that sell vehicles here when discussing Chinese EVs.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ever heard of dumping? Because that’s exactly how you fight it.