Why is everyone getting angry at this woman who most likely doesn’t even exist
It’s fun and risk free
People love hating people. Simple as
“I hereby give you my consent to put a condom on my penis, random penile scientist girl.”
Either this only happened to the FOAF of someone interviewed on FoxNews, or if it did, it was a false-flag operation organised by Turning Point or some similar group to radicalise young men against feminism and consent culture, as anyone who gave it a moment’s thought would see that that would be its outcome.
Was it because OP deftly applied the condom by mouth?
Reminds me of that bit on The Office about safe sex. Darryl says something like “Oh, I didn’t know we were doing trick questions. What’s the safest way to go skiing? Not go skiing.”
Ask the ski boots for consent before shoving your foot in them.
“Did you ask them for their consent before putting them here on display, naked?”
“If you have an issue with being out on display, say no”
“…”
deleted by creator
Oh, they’re real penises of actual models, not model penises.
If someone sprung that trap on me, I’d say “no, it’s a toy. A toy doesn’t have any consent right or consciousness… just like a woman” and than I’d just walk away. If you want to be cunts, ww can be cunts
That’s a pretty toxic joke dude
It’s not a joke, it’s an expression of my disgust for the entrapment.
Still funny
Being asked to do a task by the person responsible for administering the task automatically obviates you from being classified as a rapist.
“We were only following orders.”
What? If another person asks me to to rape a person then does that absolve me from being a rapist? Am i misunderstanding you?
We are talking about dildos dude.
If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can’t be a raping their dildo. It ain’t difficult.
In the context they’re obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can’t be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.
Yes.
They are penis models, not human beings.
It is context specific.
If a human being asked you to do sex things to them and you decide to do it then you have been granted enthusiastic consent to do those sex things.
So if they are model penises but you are not asked to put the condom on them, but you do anyway, is that sexual assault?
The original comment doesnt include anything about objects… It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.
Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.
The post does point out that there’s a table full of penis models (so essentially dildos) and that the task is to put a condom on one of them.
A bodyless fake penis is clearly not a sentient being so the only way a violation of consent happened if consent applied to inanimate objects. That is, of course, a ridiculous and easily attacked proposition.
In the end this would be an example of trying to make a valid point but making it in a clumsy way.
You really have to get into that mercenary mindset. You’re obviously not responsible for your actions, if you’re just executing tasks someone else wants you to do. Smh
Shoulda put the condom on your own penis. 🤦♂️
Still missing consent agreement
This is difficult for people with schizophrenia
trolling is a art
*an /j
trolling is an /j
“Sorry, it was my first time with a dildo.”
(stare in silence for a moment too long… go ahead… respond…
What did you use the other times 🙄
Oh, I’m vegan…
Best come back is did you ask before?
Reddit spacing
“Your model, my choice”
