• GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Wtf is that event name? That is possibly the most convoluted way to write “disability awareness day”.

    • pancakes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I work in an accessibility-focused field and can say person-first verbiage is more important for those with visible/ serious conditions that society tends to focus on over them as a person.

      The spirit is that you view them as a person, instead of a their condition. It might seem obvious, but imagine you have a very visible physical disability. People are always talking about your condition, asking you about it, it’s the first thing people focus on when they meet you. As a person, you don’t want your condition to define who you are. As an example, if you worked really hard to win a major award, would you prefer the headline “First Name Last Name Wins Award”, or “Severely Autistic Person Wins Award”?

      It’s fairly nuanced, and within some groups (such as ASD) there is actually pushback against person-first. But then there’s people that it really helps so it’s more of a “just be chill and not a dick about things” kind of vibe. Kind of like pronouns where some people make a huge fuss whenever they’re mentioned. In reality, it’s more about just treating people with respect as well as not walking on eggshells around everyone.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The convoluted one puts an emphasis on a person, not on a disability. I am aware of my disability always, I don’t need a special day for it. A day to recognize me might be nice however. That sort of logic.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s literally the same logic that led to “people of color”, just applied to having a disability.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      They had to find something between #DayOfRememberanceOfThoseWithDifferingAbilities and #CrippleDay.

      But yeah, it does seem off.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I think it stems from a movement to stop identifying people first by their disability. I think along the lines of the difference between “Here’s a disabled person” or “Here’s a person who happens to have a disability.” Lots of people would rather be first identified as a person.

      Shrug.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The idea that an adjective being literally first in a phrase, determining what a person “is identified as” first, is ridiculous.

    • ayyy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      But I have to have a way to look down on people who are sympathetic to my cause but aren’t serially online. How else will everyone know I’m more compassionate than you?

  • dumbass@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Before I got my glasses the stars looked big and well star shaped, with lots of little spikes, I was utterly disappointed when I got my glasses, looked at the night sky and they’re just dots, boring ass dots.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ll be that guy… in reality, an Axolotl and a Chameleon aren’t going to be hanging out and looking at the night sky. Axolotls live under water and can spend short periods of time outside of the water. Chameleons live above water and spend almost no time under water. These two animals live in environments that are inherently exclusive to one another.

    • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I like how you had to dive into those specifics to see this was unrealistic, and both of them speaking and understanding English is completely looked over.

      Talking animals? Fine! But damned if two from different habits are hanging out! Suspension of disbelief broken!

      • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Anthropomorphism is substantially more common than aquatic animals comfortably living on land.

        • Sporkbomber@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Anthropomorphism is attributing human traits to non-humans. Maybe the axolotl has the human trait of being just fine on land. That’s why both are sitting like humans.

          There, I fixed it for you. You can now enjoy the comic.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a cute comic dude.

      No one is asking you to be that guy. No one cares.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, that’s what makes it such a fun Hallmark fish axolotl-out-of-water movie! Duh…