• megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you think someone is a troll using the permissive social norms of a community to be unreasonable, don’t interact. That’s the proper response to a troll trying to bait, ignore. If they’re not a troll, just particular, then you’ve avoided the issue by not interacting.

    No one is being forced to be here, every choice to be here is voluntary. Every interaction is voluntary, if you choose to interact with someone who upsets you, that’s your choice. If you think the rule of “don’t intentionally misgender people” is unreasonable, you can choose to not be here.

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean, the most telling part is the instance where most of the triggered users were from. Little hint, it wasn’t blahaj or any other queer-friendly instance.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Fuck those losers that were complaining. The think they’re allies, but you earn that title; and they failed super hard when they started complaining and treating someone’s pronouns as if it was a reward for good behavior. You use someone’s preferred pronouns regardless of how you feel. That’s allyship.

  • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    the real paradox of tolerance is how quickly “tolerant” people fall back into gender essentialism rhetoric the moment they’re presented with anything outside of their comfort zone.

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      8 days ago

      Y’all are getting hit with they/them from me not because of intolerance but because it’s my default way of referring to people let alone online.

      I don’t read comments and posts as: [username] says “yada yada.”

      I read them as: [random person nearby wanting to engage in small talk] says “yada yada”

      I don’t read the usernames often which has lead to funny situations where I was having a pleasant conversation in one thread and a shit show in another with the same person.

      I engage like I would with small talk with a stranger. We don’t need to exchange names to chat, it’s not important. Hell I used to talk with a handful of people daily when I rode the city bus. Did that for 2 years. We never learned each others names. I even went to one of their kid’s weddings. Was quite the party, still didn’t catch their name though.

      • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Which is fine, until you know someones pronouns. At which point, continuing to use they/them becomes an issue that will get moderator action.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I’ll do what I can (I do proof read my comments and I always seem to miss things) but with how my brain processes info and holds info it’s a hurdle for sure.

          I don’t want to write a novel as reply explaining how my brain processes info here but how little my brain holds gender info or processes it, it’s like sand in a collander.

          Like I’ll be hammering a reply, the info slips out of my brain, and due to using gender neutral / agnostic pronouns for people by default I switch to using them without noticing. And then it slips through the proof reading process as the info is gone at that point.

          Like if you’ve seen that video that went viral like a decade ago where people where the premise is “follow the basketball” and a dude dressed as a gorilla walks through the middle, and no one notices the gorilla when watching the video, it’s kinda like that. I focus on the conversation topic and engaging with the other person, and rest of the info falls away.

          It’s kinda hard to explain (though I did write many novel elsewhere about it)

          I hope I don’t catch any strays from a mod because that info just doesn’t get held in my brain, but given enough time I’ll probably catch at least 1.

          Edit: I think I came up with an idea on how to voice my thinking but bear with me it’s odd. Say there’s 3 people, 1 is colorblind (monochromatic), 1 says there’s only a handful of colors and the rest are confused, and the third says there’s a color spectrum. The monochromatic colorblind person agrees with the person who says there’s a spectrum (basically everything is a spectrum, why not color?) but due to not seeing color defaults to refering to things in generic ways. Would you say the colorblind person is an ally to the person saying there’s a spectrum or would you say that they’re an ally to the person saying there’s only a small number of colors and the rest are confused?

          I’m basically the monochromatic colorblind person in this scenario. It’s Greek to me.

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            If someone tells you the way you’re addressing them is making them uncomfortable, change the way you’re addressing. You don’t need to be perfect, you need to try, and you need to be willing to fix your slip ups when they happen

        • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          What about names? If I decide then and there not to use pronouns at all, and instead refer to that person by name, how would that weigh?

          How about “that person” or “that user”?

          • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            If someone makes it clear they’re not comfortable with the way you’re addressing them, change the way you address them. If you can’t change the way you address them without making yourself uncomfortable, then stop engaging with the person in question

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        8 days ago

        well with that you’re doing better than a good chunk of the internet 😆 i think unless it comes up in conversation, it’s totes fine to revert to they/them especially for short chit-chat

  • Noel_Skum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 days ago

    Disclaimer: I’m so far away from Blahaj’s demographic I don’t even know why I’m commenting…

    Random internet person called Ada devotes their time, bandwidth, expertise, server etc to help random netizens interact with each other. Sets some rules - their space, their rules. Reasonable.

    Don’t like the rules? Either fuck off or… find a workaround? “That person, their, you” should cover most things ( and are suitably neutral to not cause unnecessary offence) if you - a bit like me - sometimes struggle with all these new words and concepts. Failing that - stop visiting is always an option. What more is there to say?

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I totally agree but would also like to point out that “their” and “you” are not accepted by either of the subjects of this drama.

      • Noel_Skum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        If that is true (which somehow I don’t doubt) I think those two people might need to be Three Billy Goats Gruffed out of here - but it’s not my space to make that call.

        Failing that? Perhaps an intervention might help.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      Your outsider’s perspective is so valuable 😆 thanks for sharing

      Also silly because it’s such a small ask, it’s not like she is saying trolls are getting a free pass here, she’s just saying “hey we’re not gonna allow you to be the judge, jury, and executioner in the comments because that kind of diatribe is literally the stuff this community is designed to minimize—we ask you to just disengage completely (or find a workaround) rather than open the floodgates for more of the same discussion and abuse that our users deal with every day. If you suspect real trolling or damage, just report them and our crack team of mods will deal with it in a way that doesn’t involve any misgendering or harassment.”

      • Noel_Skum
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        First of all, thanks to you folk for allowing me to walk in and have a look around.

        Yes - it seems such a simple ask. Play by the rules; or don’t play at all.

        A few people I work with occasionally had real problems in this field. I discovered that calling a Portuguese Spanish, Bangladeshis Indian and Poles German soon focused their minds on accuracy of language. I’m an (adopted) Welsh person and have spent about two percent of my entire life explaining that I’m not English. I suppose it’s a parable of sorts…

  • ✧✨🌿Allo🌿✨✧
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    They are called pronoumpires; They get their energy from using the wrong pronouns on people.

    That ruling essentially denies them their feeding ground.

    • Shiggles
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Lol

      Lmao even

      Genuine question - can you show me an example of someone referring to the very serious terminally online dragon enjoyer as something worse than “they”?