And they’re already kissing Trump’s ass

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Spreading for awareness, I’ve been posting this in relevant threads for a week - This is all theater.

    trump is going to “save” tik tok after starting the initial push to ban it (for the wrong reasons) to pretend he did something for you. Worst part is that all of the no/low info voters and non voters will eat it up.

    It’s the equivalent of a person pushing you into the middle of the street and at the very last second, that same person tells the drivers to all stop. “Wow, I owe you my life!”

    And now, this adds two layers:

    1. You think trump and the Supreme Court are colluding? now they get to say, nah uh!!! Even though again, this is all convoluted.

    2. trump gets to look “stronger” than the “highest court in the land” to help delude the next generation of low info tiktok folks.

    P.s. The Chinese “protest” apps are going to mine the FUCK out of these millions of phones in the brief window they have them. Also, when the kids inevitably move back to tiktok, majority of them will leave these other apps installed on their phones, dormant and collecting in the background.

  • WeUnite@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I did some research and now I know why Trump wants to “save” TikTok.

    https://www.theinformation.com/articles/how-tiktok-courted-conservatives-before-trumps-win

    https://www.isdglobal.org/isd-publications/tiktok-and-white-supremacist-content/

    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/on-tiktok-misogyny-and-white-supremacy-slip-through-enforcement-gap

    https://www.counterextremism.com/press/extremist-content-online-tiktok-accounts-spreading-extreme-right-propaganda-and-glorifying

    https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/16/congress/tiktok-sponsor-trump-inauguration-party-00198825

    This one is especially damning:

    TikTok is spending $50,000 on an inauguration party honoring influencers who helped Donald Trump spread his campaign message, according to the party organizer — and it’s scheduled for Sunday, the deadline for the company to spin off from its China-based owner or be banned in the U.S.

    CEO Shou Zi Chew is expected to attend.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 hours ago

    That second paragraph is just vile. Donny brought this ban into motion and now they say he will save them?

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 minutes ago

      Not yet but the law gives the president authority to determine whether the company is a national security threat once it meets all the qualifications in the law. So his “90 day extension” is legally him saying “actually they’re not a threat” for 90 days and then “actually they are a threat” after that.

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        So the president has the authority to extend it for 90 days. After that it’s done?

  • sunglocto@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I know bad for democracy and everything but

    This app has done nothing positive for my life, arguably began my social media addiction, filled my brain with negative content at the height of COVID and severely impacted my mental health

    I don’t think governments should ban platforns. But do I think TikTok should have ever existed? No

    • Senseless@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      And yet most of it’s users are either to stupid or addicted to see the issue and just switch to RedNote, no questions asked. Which in turn nullifies the ban altogether.

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If not for TikTok Israel’s genocide would have gone unreported in Western media and censored on US social media.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I don’t use TikTok but I knew plenty about Israel’s actions. It was all over the internet and plenty of news sources.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Do you want to help a company that kisses Trump’s asshole or do you want to find the next free app that does the same thing as TikTok?

  • Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What I find mad is that people are seriously depressed about this on /r/Tiktok. Yeah sure, I understand small creators now having a tough time having their business disappearing, but people are literally saying that TikTok was their only source of information and that they don’t know what to do now??

    • viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      So the ban is reaching exactly the people it was set out to reach. Good.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Given the amount of nonsense that was on tiktok they’ll probably be more informed now.

  • mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Surreal watching the rest of the internet freaking out. Meanwhile we are just sitting here on our own platforms doing our own things.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Personally, I never saw the appeal of TikTok anyway.

      Then again I also was never interested in Twitter.

      I guess my attention span isn’t short enough for that type of sites.

      • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I wouldn’t say that I don’t see the appeal of it. I would probably get sucked right in if I gave it a shot. It’s a consciouss decision on my part to simply not do that. I don’t not-consume short-form media because I’m better than the people who do, I prohibit it from myself.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Drag gave youtube shorts a try when it came out, and then installed an extension to disable them because they’re boring.

      • ch00f@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I would scroll a bit after someone linked me a video. Content was fun, but after like 3 minutes, I could feel something wrong in my brain. Like just the nonstop influx of content with no breaks. You might think one video was faked, but you didn’t have enough time to contemplate it before another shows up in its place.

        I have some friends who spend hours on it. I can’t imagine deciding to participate in that for so long.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Short video formats on all platforms make me very quickly feel like I’m going crazy. Just one voice after another, trying to cram whatever they have to say into your ears, or one joke taken out of context, or one simplistic moral, or absurdist humor that wouldn’t hold up for longer than a few seconds. My partner watches endless “reels” on Facebook, and that hurried talking they all do, with all those cuts to make sure there’s no gap between words, makes me fell very weird and agitated. It’s like everyone has the same voice. And then it keeps looping. I waste far too much time on Lemmy but the short video stuff seems like another level of brain melt.

      • ramirezmike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        TikTok has tons of issues but this bugs me so much. There are many examples of people sharing their creativity, their skill, their knowledge, their passion to the world on tiktok and it’s so good at exposing you to it if you are interested in seeing all kinds of people expressing themselves.

        Since when does the value of content correlate directly with the amount of time it consumes?

        is brevity no longer the soul of wit??

        • macniel@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If they want to share all of that, what hinders them to start an actual blog?

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Tiktok ban is a good opportunity to educate the common folk on the benefits of federation

      Although I am not sure if short video format addicts’ needs can be fixed with this elegant solution but it definitely works well enough as reddit and twitter replacement.

      • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t see how this has anything to do with federated platforms. I’d argue that watching Loops is just as bad for one’s mental health than TikTok is.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Shit ain’t free!

          But text is cheap enough to make text base federated social media a thing. So freedom oriented plebs have a refuge.

      • Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s called Instagram or YouTube Shorts. Same thing…TikTok offered nothing new. And I’m here, but all I see on Lemmy are the same posts 3-4 times, predictable pearl clutching reactions to everything, and very limited news coverage with a proclivity for posting random, fringe sources

        • kronisk @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          You have a point. It felt different when I signed up but now all the most upvoted content here seems to be screenshots from Twitter, regurgitated memes and similar low-effort dopamine triggers. And when I left reddit it was mostly reposted TikTok reels anyway. Cognitive fast food that’s easy to lose yourself in but unhealthy and unfulfilling as a habit. Lemmy doesn’t really have many niche communities to outweigh the slop either. Consequently, I spend less time here as well. Which is probably a good thing.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I don’t respect corporate trash… But if it works for you, great!

          Make sure to have location sharing enabled;)

  • Hal-5700X
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Good, it’s poison for the mind.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And now Trump gets to be the one who saved TikTok, despite starting the process.

    • ArbitraryValue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s an own-goal for Biden - an unpopular law that starts being enforced the day before Trump gets to stop enforcing it.

      • rc__buggy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily. The server is still there, my wife logged in and saw the notice.

        It’s just theater.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          No one is enforcing it, it’s a play by TikTok. TikTok did it voluntarily

          Yup. In fact, Biden had specifically said he will not enforce the ban.

          Which, incidentally…might be the same thing Trump does to “unban TikTok” once he takes office. Which is bizarre, on both sides. Like…that’s literally not legal for a president to do. They can’t legally just ignore an Act of Congress.

          Not that the law matters in America anymore. The Supreme Court has pretty definitively seen to that.

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

            the only thing the ‘president’ can do is extend the deadline by 90 days given evidence that the company is closing-in on a deal.

            with scotus out of the way, ruling in favor of trump’s initial desires, and that which subsequently passed through congress; it is now up to congress to undo the legislation if they so choose.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              enforcement is up to the ag, so yea. they could just ‘ignore’ the law.

              In practice, there’s no real mechanism to force it (especially if Congress is unwilling to impeach & convict). But legally speaking, the Take Care clause of the constitution obligates the President (through his executive) to enforce all laws passed by Congress. Ignoring it would be unconstitutional.

          • rc__buggy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The executive branch can selectively enforce laws, look at all the weed dispensaries the feds could just waltz into and have a federal case against everyone.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          TikTok and its service providers are liable. “No one is enforcing” is meaningless, because they can still be prosecuted retrospectively if the US Government changes its mind.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        As designed by the republicans. There are legitimate reasons to regulate tiktok, if Biden opposed though, they’d say he was a weak Chinese sympathizer, if he complied, they’d do this.

        It was a trap where you were fucked either way, as the republican think tank ghouls drew it out.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Not sure why you think it’s an own goal. Biden didn’t set the day for it to take effect, that was written into the law by Congress. You could say it was an own goal because Biden announced he wasn’t going to enforce it, but that seems to be the opposite of what you’re trting to claim And even with that decision to not enforce the law for 1 day before the Trump admin takes over, none of the companies TikTok works with like Apple or Google to list it in the app stores gave a shit about that lack of enforcement because of the uncertainty.

        Not to mention Trump being the start of the ban in the first place. He was President when all of this started to work it’s way through the process, even if Biden was the President when it actually made it through Congress, with bipartisan support. Trump only changed positions because he wants TokTok to pay him to continue to allow it to continue.

        • cyd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          More Americans have TikTok accounts than vote. For a shitload of normies who have only the vaguest notion of politics and current affairs, the app they’ve been enjoying gets cut off as the defining event of the waning days of the Biden administration. They are not going to care about how Trump tried to do it first, or it was bipartisan, or whatever. It’s hard not to see how this will cost Dems dearly.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            No it won’t. Biden is already out of office as far as normies are concerned. He has been since the election, but definitely within 24 hours of inauguration. TikTok stops working and the next thing they see is Trump having a huge party with a shit ton of pomp and circumstance for his inauguration as he gets into the White House. And then TikTok still doesn’t work when they open it up. Maybe he brings it back, maybe he doesn’t. Voters don’t pay enough attention to separate his inauguration and the TikTok ban happening 24 hours apart, they’ll bundle it together as one event.

            Unless he gets a massive cash infusion from Bytedance in the next 24 hours, he won’t give TikTok an extension on day one in office. He’s the kind of person that expects his payment up front.

            So everyone will instead see it stop working as President Trump takes over, and then it continuing to not work after. Some may give him the benefit of the doubt, but they weren’t ever going to vote for anyone else anyway, he’s their God Emperor President and they’ve confirmed their world view around him being perfect.

            Heck, he might try to spin it as some sort of promotional opportunity for Truth Social.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              The law isn’t being enforced. TikTok can just put it back up tomorrow and imply it was Trump that did it.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                That won’t stop Apple and Google from keeping it pulled from app stores until things are more concrete.

                TikTok only blocked access and put that notice up in the app after their partners decided that a statement from the outgoing administration 24 before the transition wasn’t enough for them to not comply with the law.

    • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      There’s still loads of bullshit surrounding the name. Hope your personal filters are up to the task the next 4 years.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It is a nice asset why shouldnt an American oligarch own it though

      Democracy, free market, and capitalism 🤡

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      The entirety of global capitalism is lining up to bend the knee and gargle fascist balls.

      This is what leftists have been warning forever. Capitalism wants the monopolies, bailouts — the political, financial and military backing, etc — that state-capitalist dictatorships provide. Democratically elected governments, acting in the interests of the people, are really the only threat to the corporate oligarchies wealth and power.

      All of the wests “enemies” are equally supportive of fascism, because state-capitalist dictators are easier to influence (bribe).

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    so which was the kicker that brought the swearing-in indoors:

    a) afraid of riots because of tiktok ban.

    b) afraid of his malformed 'shroom freezing to his diaper in the cold.

    c) afraid of getting another piercing.

    d) afraid of dreadfully pathetic crowds at the mall and in photographs he can’t lie about after last time.

    e) all of the above.

    f) all of the above, and also…