I’m just not really getting all the hate hate. These people started a community or worked their way into a mod spot. They had a specific set of rules for the community that was posted and reasonably fair. Their community got popular. They realized their site admin was modding their community according to rules that they didn’t want to also enforce. They tried to move the community to a better fit instance as non-dramatically as they knew how.
That’s all perfectly reasonable to me. Clearly they did a shit job at doing it non dramatically but they’re communicating and adjusting their position to try and accommodate others and that alone should buy them a little good will. They are trying to figure out what to do, everyone is trying to figure out what to do. What’s with all the hate?
You’re overlooking that the users don’t want to move. The mods seem to think that they’re the reason we use 196 and that they can just pack us into a suitcase and take us wherever they like, when the fact is we use blahaj zone for a reason and they can’t take us anywhere. They’re perfectly free to close the sub and make a new one elsewhere, but no one’s going to follow them.
It’s like, imagine you’re renting a house with a few people and one of the people none of the housemates really like (they don’t follow the house rules everyone has agreed on) marches in and announces “We all, as a group, are moving to Florida!” And then moves out and takes the refrigerator and expects you to follow. No thanks, good riddance, we’re getting a new fridge and a better housemate.
I understand I’m being a pedant but it sounds more similar to a landlord telling their tenants that the house being rented is legally being moved across state borders. The landlord had house rules under the umbrella of state law and wanted a new umbrella. Tenants are saying “this state is fine and, fuck off, we brought all the furniture in this house.”
If you want to be pedantic, the landlord is the admin and the house rules have been set by them. The only power the mod housemate has is ownership of something everybody uses that’s replaceable. We’re not going to Florida to follow the fridge.
I was wondering why this reply seemed so weird to me before realizing it was ultimately just saying, “but actually, what I originally said.”
I also didn’t explain why I thought my pedantic answer seemed more appropriate. I will do so here:
The instance admins are envisioned as [US] states because they hold general sway over a number of communities, in this metaphor “properties”. They have control, independent from over adjacent “states”. Community mods mirror “landlords” in that they own a “property”(community) and impose specific guidelines about how users, in this metaphor “tenants”, interact with the “property”. The “state”(instance) can arbitrate during disputes and generally won’t allow a “property” to apply guidelines that break their state laws.
Of course, the “tenants” are providing all the value. The “landlords” can also be replaced without much concern to the “tenants” unless the new landlord has new rules about interactions with the “property.” If the “landlord” has rules that are too annoying or even closes the “property”, the “tenants” might be annoyed but they can take all their stuff with them to a new “property” with different “landlords.” Maybe even move to a place in a new “state.”
If the guy with fridge says “no more fridge”, all the stuff in the house doesn’t get locked down.
“as they knew how” is carrying a lot of weight there. Just reading through the responses to https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/20937206, people were very incensed, and as people are saying here the mods responses are only making the already tense situation far worse.
From what I’ve seen it appears that (at least one of) the mods claim to “own” the community - which is a disturbing way of thinking about moderation, in my opinion.
I mean one of the things that I hated most about Reddit in my final days was that the admins removed and replaced mods that purposefully closed in protest.
If someone starts a sub they should be allowed to close and nuke it at will. If someone wants it back enough then they can make a clone.
I think this post and the reply highlight the tricky waters we are trying to navigate here in the Fediverse.
I’ve moderated web forums since there was a Web and usually, the final call is with whoever is paying the bills. Here that is more complicated because, although this instance is fully-funded by the users and I consider myself largely a caretaker in my Admin role (and, by extension, Mods don’t “own” their communities they are looking after them for all of us), my name (and @[email protected]’) is above the door and we do have legal responsibilities based on the laws in the jurisdictions we operate in.
On the other hand we have the ethos that came over from Reddit, that Mods have some degree if ownership over the communities and some instances tend to operate with that idea, to the point it can be difficult to get new Mode appointed if others have gone AWOL, leading to people starting duplicate communities on the same instance.
Where these two ways of thinking clash you can get some degree of drama, as we are seeing here. Ada and her team take a strong line on certain things, as you’d expect from their instance but the 196 Mods didn’t appreciate what they see as interference in the running if “their” community.
This would be just another day in the Fediverse and an example of why it is wise to have a word with an Admin on an instance before starting what might be a large, potentially controversial, community in order to ensure the Admins and Mods are on the same page.
It’s like, imagine you’re renting a house with a few people and one of the people none of the housemates really like (they don’t follow the house rules everyone has agreed on) marches in and announces “We all, as a group, are moving to Florida!” And then moves out and takes the refrigerator and expects you to follow. No thanks, good riddance, we’re getting a new fridge and a better housemate.
They can do whatever they want with the space, paint it blue, burn it, close it, whatever. They shouldn’t expect people to follow them.
I don’t disagree with your first paragraph but partly do with the second.
If it’s a unique channel-type community you started, produce most of the content for and actively moderate quickly and consistently then, for sure, you should have almost complete control… but 196 is/was none of those things.
Nah, it’s one of the use cases for sites/services like reddit and lemmy.
A way to have a forum for your specific interest that you can build into the kind of community you want.
The barrier to hosting a standalone forum is very high. Prohibitively so. The time, the money, the level of skill needed.
Reddit, for a long time, treated subs exactly like that. It hosted your forum, and as long as you didn’t do illegal shit, they would leave you alone. You owned it as much as you can own anything on someone else’s hardware.
Lemmy is entirely a clone of reddit based in a reaction to reddit stopping that way of doing things.
The key to lemmy though, is that instances are individual reddits. You host the instance, you decide how “subs” are allowed to function. Some instances have a looser way of doing things, others are more hands on.
But, really, a moderator that creates a community should be as close to the owner of the community as you can get when it’s hosted on someone else’s hardware. You can try a fully democratic community, and they can work. But they don’t work better than what amounts to a dictatorship model. It’s just that it takes a higher number of people being jerks to fuck up a community when it’s democratic. Organization by a panel is slower to adapt, and also more open to disruption because of that.
It’s all about the benefits and drawbacks.
All of that is still trumped by the fact that whoever literally owns the instance can nuke, take over, ban, whatever any community or users. So it isn’t like you can escape ownership without making a formally run instance with a legally binding structure. Without that, you still have to hope that the owner doesn’t go crazy.
As I’ve mentioned somewhere else I’d take all that in to consideration if it was a more niche sub - but it isn’t. It very much seems to be that a already existing community found its way to Blahaj where (almost) all of the contributors were happy. Then some mods arbitrarily decided that they didn’t like the instance and moved to… .world, of all places. Back towards centralisation and the possible looming spectre of interacting with meta users too.
Though, I would call 196 pretty niche, just not small. That’s piddling over word usage though, and not at all relevant to the real point you made.
I definitely agree that the moving was a bad call, btw. Particularly where it moved to, and for the same reasons you gave. I don’t have a stake in it, I’ve always found the 196 thing a bit too silly even for my absurdist tastes. It still seems like a horrible way to handle everything overall.
Yeah, at the end of the day Lemmy is just a colloboration between the users, the mods, and the admins.
The admins do have the final say, but in order for users to use their instance in the first place and communities to grow there, they also have to follow the desires of the users and work with the moderators to a major extent. It’s just teamwork and being able to compromise on some things but stay true to your principles on other things.
This really shouldn’t have been as big a deal as it became, and I would blame that mostly on the mods, somewhat on the users, and maybe just a little bit on the admins for not discouraging the moderators from taking this action in the first place. Everyone could probably have done a little bit better, but it was mostly on the mods for making a bonehead decision without realizing the consequences. That being said, raking them over the coals in the aftermath doesn’t really accomplish anything other than letting people feel self-righteous.
It’s very easy to see from the outside and in retrospect, but when you’re making moderator decisions every single day, you tend to lose a bit of perspective. It can be frustrating especially if admins are interfering with a community that you dedicate so much time and effort to, and I like to think if everyone had walked a mile in those shoes before, they probably wouldn’t be acting so condescending right now.
That being said, raking them over the coals in the aftermath doesn’t really accomplish anything other than letting people feel self-righteous.
The mods are still in place, and trust is definitely eroded, so we’re probably not in the aftermath yet.
I like to think if everyone had walked a mile in those shoes before, they probably wouldn’t be acting so condescending right now.
I have issues taking seriously a mod that still doesn’t have a local account to get the reports after so long, and blame it on the admins
So perhaps if LBZ was the right instance to check reports from, it would have been super helpful for both parties if they accepted my application. I’m still waiting two years later.
Blaze has definitely been the biggest shit-stirrer in the situation. He’s all over every thread about the migration doing what he can to stir up drama.
I think the problem was the fact that they blocked the “old” community, despite a lot of people coming forward to actually keep the “old” community alive.
And then they unlocked the community. They fucked up and they apologized. Certain users really need to take a deep breath and stop writing essays on the topic calling for everyone’s heads. It’s giving off major Karen vibes, which belong as far away from c/196 as possible.
This is the internet, this is Lemmy, it’s really not that big of a deal. Laugh about the drama, make memes about it, but for the love of God please stop taking everything so seriously.
This comment isn’t directed towards you, but rather to a bunch of others I’ve seen from my cursory glance at a few threads, calling for everyone’s resignation and expressing their outrage. Like calm the fuck down, you’re embarrassing yourselves, and by extension the rest of us.
This comment isn’t directed towards you, but rather to a bunch of others I’ve seen from my cursory glance at a few threads, calling for everyone’s resignation and expressing their outrage. Like calm the fuck down, you’re embarrassing yourselves, and by extension the rest of us.
It just gave very Reddit API shutdown vibes, which is not something people have very good memories of.
Also most of the energy was dedicated to the creation of [email protected] , which was the evidence that the community was ready to restart elsewhere had the mods kept the community locked
It was just a difference of opinion in the way they wanted to moderate the community and how the admin wanted to moderate her server. And of course, the admin has the last word.
But this stuff happens all the time on Lemmy, the only unusual thing is they decided to take the nuclear option and lock the community. Then they realized their mistake and unlocked it. It is what it is. I just get annoyed at all the people who flock to this drama like flies to shit so they can pile on the mods. It’s super lame.
I am not going to take a community off of people who haven’t broken any instance rules. Mods need to have confidence that the communities they run aren’t going to be arbitrarily taken away from them because of an issue with an instance admin.
That’s an interesting difference to note with the usual admin/mod hierarchy
so they can pile on the mods. It’s super lame.
Mods shouldn’t make such decisions without asking the community first. That was supposedly the idea of Lemmy, having power tripping mods being kept in check by meta communities like [email protected] and the ability to move to another community on a whim. Still impressive to see how [email protected] got active in only a few hours, that’s definitely something that’s interesting.
Dude they’ve been doing this for the entire time since the switch happened. I give it another 24 hours or so for the schadenfreude and then the smart thing is to simply block and ignore their little corner of the internet.
Yeah, it took me a long time to realize because that user is extremely careful to always be superficially polite and always framing their actions as trying to help the fediverse, but I’m beginning to recognize that they’re basically an energy vampire that just drags down the vibe of Lemmy with constant but what about or I don’t fully agree replies.
They seem to make every discussion way more complicated and contentious than it needs to be. What is the point of constantly linking and posting about every single time that anybody has a disagreement on Lemmy? They would nominally say they do it to expose mod abuse or whatever, but it’s typically fairly innocuous incidents that get blown way out of proportion. Mods aren’t ever going to be perfect, and constantly putting them and also random users on blast is extremely unproductive, because you get a whole bunch of commenters who don’t understand any of the nuance of the situation and inevitably get their pitchforks out, causing way more frustration and anger than the original situation would have caused otherwise.
They also never upvote anybody who replies to them, even when they occasionally claim to agree, which is extremely rare in itself. Who does that? Like how do you use Lemmy that much but consistently refuse to upvote the other users who are taking time out of their day to have a discussion with you? They make using Lemmy seem boring and tedious, which is really quite a remarkable accomplishment considering how many other interesting personalities we have on here. And they always sound extremely insincere when they performatively congratulate or thank others, often opting for a one word Nice! or Thanks. Like I said, energy vampire. I could go on, but you get the message. I do not like this user and I am suspicious of their intentions.
Yeah, it took me a long time to realize because that user is extremely careful to always be superficially polite and always framing their actions as trying to help the fediverse, but I’m beginning to recognize that they’re basically an energy vampire that just drags down the vibe of Lemmy with constant but what about or I don’t fully agree replies.
They seem to make every discussion way more complicated and contentious than it needs to be. What is the point of constantly linking and posting about every single time that anybody has a disagreement on Lemmy? They would nominally say they do it to expose mod abuse or whatever, but it’s typically fairly innocuous incidents that get blown way out of proportion. Mods aren’t ever going to be perfect, and constantly putting them and also random users on blast is extremely unproductive, because you get a whole bunch of commenters who don’t understand any of the nuance of the situation and inevitably get their pitchforks out, causing way more frustration and anger than the original situation would have caused otherwise.
They also never upvote anybody who replies to them, even when they occasionally claim to agree, which is extremely rare in itself. Who does that? Like how do you use Lemmy that much but consistently refuse to upvote the other users who are taking time out of their day to have a discussion with you? They make using Lemmy seem boring and tedious, which is really quite a remarkable accomplishment considering how many other interesting personalities we have on here. And they always sound extremely insincere when they performatively congratulate or thank others, often opting for a one word Nice! or Thanks. Like I said, energy vampire. I could go on, but you get the message. I do not like this user and I am suspicious of their intentions.
I’m just going to quote the whole thing because it’s just too good.
I’m just not really getting all the hate hate. These people started a community or worked their way into a mod spot. They had a specific set of rules for the community that was posted and reasonably fair. Their community got popular. They realized their site admin was modding their community according to rules that they didn’t want to also enforce. They tried to move the community to a better fit instance as non-dramatically as they knew how.
That’s all perfectly reasonable to me. Clearly they did a shit job at doing it non dramatically but they’re communicating and adjusting their position to try and accommodate others and that alone should buy them a little good will. They are trying to figure out what to do, everyone is trying to figure out what to do. What’s with all the hate?
You’re overlooking that the users don’t want to move. The mods seem to think that they’re the reason we use 196 and that they can just pack us into a suitcase and take us wherever they like, when the fact is we use blahaj zone for a reason and they can’t take us anywhere. They’re perfectly free to close the sub and make a new one elsewhere, but no one’s going to follow them.
It’s like, imagine you’re renting a house with a few people and one of the people none of the housemates really like (they don’t follow the house rules everyone has agreed on) marches in and announces “We all, as a group, are moving to Florida!” And then moves out and takes the refrigerator and expects you to follow. No thanks, good riddance, we’re getting a new fridge and a better housemate.
I understand I’m being a pedant but it sounds more similar to a landlord telling their tenants that the house being rented is legally being moved across state borders. The landlord had house rules under the umbrella of state law and wanted a new umbrella. Tenants are saying “this state is fine and, fuck off, we brought all the furniture in this house.”
If you want to be pedantic, the landlord is the admin and the house rules have been set by them. The only power the mod housemate has is ownership of something everybody uses that’s replaceable. We’re not going to Florida to follow the fridge.
I was wondering why this reply seemed so weird to me before realizing it was ultimately just saying, “but actually, what I originally said.”
I also didn’t explain why I thought my pedantic answer seemed more appropriate. I will do so here:
The instance admins are envisioned as [US] states because they hold general sway over a number of communities, in this metaphor “properties”. They have control, independent from over adjacent “states”. Community mods mirror “landlords” in that they own a “property”(community) and impose specific guidelines about how users, in this metaphor “tenants”, interact with the “property”. The “state”(instance) can arbitrate during disputes and generally won’t allow a “property” to apply guidelines that break their state laws.
Of course, the “tenants” are providing all the value. The “landlords” can also be replaced without much concern to the “tenants” unless the new landlord has new rules about interactions with the “property.” If the “landlord” has rules that are too annoying or even closes the “property”, the “tenants” might be annoyed but they can take all their stuff with them to a new “property” with different “landlords.” Maybe even move to a place in a new “state.”
If the guy with fridge says “no more fridge”, all the stuff in the house doesn’t get locked down.
The actual tenant here would be the admin. They own the house and don’t want to get involved in the housemates internal discussions
“as they knew how” is carrying a lot of weight there. Just reading through the responses to https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/20937206, people were very incensed, and as people are saying here the mods responses are only making the already tense situation far worse.
From what I’ve seen it appears that (at least one of) the mods claim to “own” the community - which is a disturbing way of thinking about moderation, in my opinion.
I mean one of the things that I hated most about Reddit in my final days was that the admins removed and replaced mods that purposefully closed in protest.
If someone starts a sub they should be allowed to close and nuke it at will. If someone wants it back enough then they can make a clone.
I think this post and the reply highlight the tricky waters we are trying to navigate here in the Fediverse.
I’ve moderated web forums since there was a Web and usually, the final call is with whoever is paying the bills. Here that is more complicated because, although this instance is fully-funded by the users and I consider myself largely a caretaker in my Admin role (and, by extension, Mods don’t “own” their communities they are looking after them for all of us), my name (and @[email protected]’) is above the door and we do have legal responsibilities based on the laws in the jurisdictions we operate in.
On the other hand we have the ethos that came over from Reddit, that Mods have some degree if ownership over the communities and some instances tend to operate with that idea, to the point it can be difficult to get new Mode appointed if others have gone AWOL, leading to people starting duplicate communities on the same instance.
Where these two ways of thinking clash you can get some degree of drama, as we are seeing here. Ada and her team take a strong line on certain things, as you’d expect from their instance but the 196 Mods didn’t appreciate what they see as interference in the running if “their” community.
This would be just another day in the Fediverse and an example of why it is wise to have a word with an Admin on an instance before starting what might be a large, potentially controversial, community in order to ensure the Admins and Mods are on the same page.
It’s like, imagine you’re renting a house with a few people and one of the people none of the housemates really like (they don’t follow the house rules everyone has agreed on) marches in and announces “We all, as a group, are moving to Florida!” And then moves out and takes the refrigerator and expects you to follow. No thanks, good riddance, we’re getting a new fridge and a better housemate.
They can do whatever they want with the space, paint it blue, burn it, close it, whatever. They shouldn’t expect people to follow them.
I don’t disagree with your first paragraph but partly do with the second.
If it’s a unique channel-type community you started, produce most of the content for and actively moderate quickly and consistently then, for sure, you should have almost complete control… but 196 is/was none of those things.
I don’t think requiring a mod team to mod and create all the content is reasonable barrier for control of their sub.
Nah, it’s one of the use cases for sites/services like reddit and lemmy.
A way to have a forum for your specific interest that you can build into the kind of community you want.
The barrier to hosting a standalone forum is very high. Prohibitively so. The time, the money, the level of skill needed.
Reddit, for a long time, treated subs exactly like that. It hosted your forum, and as long as you didn’t do illegal shit, they would leave you alone. You owned it as much as you can own anything on someone else’s hardware.
Lemmy is entirely a clone of reddit based in a reaction to reddit stopping that way of doing things.
The key to lemmy though, is that instances are individual reddits. You host the instance, you decide how “subs” are allowed to function. Some instances have a looser way of doing things, others are more hands on.
But, really, a moderator that creates a community should be as close to the owner of the community as you can get when it’s hosted on someone else’s hardware. You can try a fully democratic community, and they can work. But they don’t work better than what amounts to a dictatorship model. It’s just that it takes a higher number of people being jerks to fuck up a community when it’s democratic. Organization by a panel is slower to adapt, and also more open to disruption because of that.
It’s all about the benefits and drawbacks.
All of that is still trumped by the fact that whoever literally owns the instance can nuke, take over, ban, whatever any community or users. So it isn’t like you can escape ownership without making a formally run instance with a legally binding structure. Without that, you still have to hope that the owner doesn’t go crazy.
As I’ve mentioned somewhere else I’d take all that in to consideration if it was a more niche sub - but it isn’t. It very much seems to be that a already existing community found its way to Blahaj where (almost) all of the contributors were happy. Then some mods arbitrarily decided that they didn’t like the instance and moved to… .world, of all places. Back towards centralisation and the possible looming spectre of interacting with meta users too.
Fair enough.
Though, I would call 196 pretty niche, just not small. That’s piddling over word usage though, and not at all relevant to the real point you made.
I definitely agree that the moving was a bad call, btw. Particularly where it moved to, and for the same reasons you gave. I don’t have a stake in it, I’ve always found the 196 thing a bit too silly even for my absurdist tastes. It still seems like a horrible way to handle everything overall.
Yeah, at the end of the day Lemmy is just a colloboration between the users, the mods, and the admins.
The admins do have the final say, but in order for users to use their instance in the first place and communities to grow there, they also have to follow the desires of the users and work with the moderators to a major extent. It’s just teamwork and being able to compromise on some things but stay true to your principles on other things.
This really shouldn’t have been as big a deal as it became, and I would blame that mostly on the mods, somewhat on the users, and maybe just a little bit on the admins for not discouraging the moderators from taking this action in the first place. Everyone could probably have done a little bit better, but it was mostly on the mods for making a bonehead decision without realizing the consequences. That being said, raking them over the coals in the aftermath doesn’t really accomplish anything other than letting people feel self-righteous.
It’s very easy to see from the outside and in retrospect, but when you’re making moderator decisions every single day, you tend to lose a bit of perspective. It can be frustrating especially if admins are interfering with a community that you dedicate so much time and effort to, and I like to think if everyone had walked a mile in those shoes before, they probably wouldn’t be acting so condescending right now.
The mods are still in place, and trust is definitely eroded, so we’re probably not in the aftermath yet.
I have issues taking seriously a mod that still doesn’t have a local account to get the reports after so long, and blame it on the admins
https://feddit.org/post/7009737/4240862
Removed by mod
Blaze has definitely been the biggest shit-stirrer in the situation. He’s all over every thread about the migration doing what he can to stir up drama.
hey I stirred some shit too :<
You very much did, and gracefully! 😄
TIL all blahaj users are my alts
Maybe let your alts take over for a while then and go touch some grass.
I think the problem was the fact that they blocked the “old” community, despite a lot of people coming forward to actually keep the “old” community alive.
And then they unlocked the community. They fucked up and they apologized. Certain users really need to take a deep breath and stop writing essays on the topic calling for everyone’s heads. It’s giving off major Karen vibes, which belong as far away from c/196 as possible.
This is the internet, this is Lemmy, it’s really not that big of a deal. Laugh about the drama, make memes about it, but for the love of God please stop taking everything so seriously.
This comment isn’t directed towards you, but rather to a bunch of others I’ve seen from my cursory glance at a few threads, calling for everyone’s resignation and expressing their outrage. Like calm the fuck down, you’re embarrassing yourselves, and by extension the rest of us.
It just gave very Reddit API shutdown vibes, which is not something people have very good memories of.
Also most of the energy was dedicated to the creation of [email protected] , which was the evidence that the community was ready to restart elsewhere had the mods kept the community locked
deleted by creator
The old community was being led by a corrupt admin, wasn’t it? Isn’t that the entire issue? Sounds like they can’t fix it.
It was just a difference of opinion in the way they wanted to moderate the community and how the admin wanted to moderate her server. And of course, the admin has the last word.
But this stuff happens all the time on Lemmy, the only unusual thing is they decided to take the nuclear option and lock the community. Then they realized their mistake and unlocked it. It is what it is. I just get annoyed at all the people who flock to this drama like flies to shit so they can pile on the mods. It’s super lame.
Ada has expressed she didn’t want to intervene
https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/comment/12477708
That’s an interesting difference to note with the usual admin/mod hierarchy
Mods shouldn’t make such decisions without asking the community first. That was supposedly the idea of Lemmy, having power tripping mods being kept in check by meta communities like [email protected] and the ability to move to another community on a whim. Still impressive to see how [email protected] got active in only a few hours, that’s definitely something that’s interesting.
Removed by mod
Dude they’ve been doing this for the entire time since the switch happened. I give it another 24 hours or so for the schadenfreude and then the smart thing is to simply block and ignore their little corner of the internet.
Yeah, it took me a long time to realize because that user is extremely careful to always be superficially polite and always framing their actions as trying to help the fediverse, but I’m beginning to recognize that they’re basically an energy vampire that just drags down the vibe of Lemmy with constant but what about or I don’t fully agree replies.
They seem to make every discussion way more complicated and contentious than it needs to be. What is the point of constantly linking and posting about every single time that anybody has a disagreement on Lemmy? They would nominally say they do it to expose mod abuse or whatever, but it’s typically fairly innocuous incidents that get blown way out of proportion. Mods aren’t ever going to be perfect, and constantly putting them and also random users on blast is extremely unproductive, because you get a whole bunch of commenters who don’t understand any of the nuance of the situation and inevitably get their pitchforks out, causing way more frustration and anger than the original situation would have caused otherwise.
They also never upvote anybody who replies to them, even when they occasionally claim to agree, which is extremely rare in itself. Who does that? Like how do you use Lemmy that much but consistently refuse to upvote the other users who are taking time out of their day to have a discussion with you? They make using Lemmy seem boring and tedious, which is really quite a remarkable accomplishment considering how many other interesting personalities we have on here. And they always sound extremely insincere when they performatively congratulate or thank others, often opting for a one word Nice! or Thanks. Like I said, energy vampire. I could go on, but you get the message. I do not like this user and I am suspicious of their intentions.
I’m just going to quote the whole thing because it’s just too good.