• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I made those edits immediately after posting my argument. Before responding to you. Sorry. I thought you read the whole argument.

    The “argument” which wasn’t there when I replied to it? And how… exactly? If you post a comment, and then start editing it, during the time you are editing it, people can click “reply” and start replying to the unedited comment. Which is why generally you should not go back and add paragraphs of stuff after you posted a comment.

    You’ve edited it several times and no-one can know which edits you did when.

    You pretended like I was calling you fat when I pointed out that most gender affirming care is for cis males with gynecomastia (which usually — but not necessarily always — correlates with obesity), despite me not having any idea of your sex or size.

    • UrPartnerInCrime
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I made those edits immediately. But even so at no point in my original argument did I talk about surgeries. You immediately went into moobs and fat boys.

      Also, you didn’t know my sex after saying when I was younger I wanted bigger muscles, a foot of height, and a massive dick? Then you really either have read anything of just dotn care to comprehend.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I made those edits immediately.

        There was none of that in it when I replied to it, and now there are seventeen “edit edits” and the comment in itself is 600% longer.

        /editedpart adding this image and this comment: Is your idea of “immediately” 20 minutes? I could write an entire book in twenty minutes.

        edit 2 here’s when i posted my comment. now compare the time of me having posted this to the time of you having edited your comment pls.

        /endeditedpart

        You took something personally and revealed something about yourself while doing that. It’s just a coincidence if you are one of those people suffering from gynecomastia. But if you are, wouldn’t you want to not have to suffer from it? Or if you’re fine and don’t have it too bad, surely you can imagine people having it worse to the point they might be bullied so severely as to consider self harm? So why wouldn’t we give those kids the treatment for that problem, when we have the resources and technology to do it safely?

        Also, you didn’t know my sex after saying when I was younger I wanted bigger muscles, a foot of height, and a massive dick?

        That was there neither. You went back to write it because you realised that you had gotten offended by me even trying to offend you, so you wrote in some bullshit after justification so it looks like it. I find that sort of behaviour pathetic.

        Why haven’t you replied to @[email protected] to his comment saying;

        Are you actively having a stroke? You were pretty politely informed and corrected and nowhere in the above responses were you attacked in anything but the most mild and tame interpretation of the word.

        I hate to toot my own horn here, but I agree with him and have not even insulted you despite this behaviour of yours.

        • UrPartnerInCrime
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Non edit this time,

          Why wouldn’t I want to give other access to body modifications even if i myself had those problems. Cause what I really needed was better adults to talk to and more people to tell me everything is fine.

          And I know I don’t have nearly as many problems as teans kids. And it’s in abd faith to compare myself. I was originally trying to point out that I don’t agree with giving kids drugs to change thrier lives cause then at what point does it get out of control and it’s just blown over.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So like, dress and act how you want, but actual genderaffirming care should be left till at least on can have a drink over it first.

            Your comment still stands like that.

            We’re not talking about “body modifications”. We are talking about gender affirming care. You may pretend it’s “body modification” but like most people have said, all of your rhetoric relies on an asinine view of a kid being able to just go up to their liberal parents and say “I want a complete gender reassignment” and get it, when any trans person goes through tons of psychiatrists and evaluations. They’re not given anything that we haven’t found to be medically safe. Which is why your “body modifications” of some absurd dick size and bone lengthening at an age where you’re still growing wouldn’t be accepted by any medical professionals as “gender affirming care.”

            It’s a childish strawman which you use to justify an extremely shitty slippery slope argument. Puberty blockers are safe and effective.

            Based on your answers, I assume you must be fervently against circumcision, because that is a literal permanent physical change to one’s genitals, and the kid doesn’t even have a say in it, much less making the choice for themselves when “they’re old enough to have a drink over it.” So you oppose allowing circumcision unless it’s medically necessary. You also oppose teenage males who get bullied for having tits getting care for that extremely simple problem. That’s the only logical conclusion from your rhetoric.

            • UrPartnerInCrime
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

              Which since talking to other people I leavened of CPP but that’s literally health problems so it’s deffrnrt.

              But, your making up stuff and trying to mold the arguem t so your right.

              Ans lastly cause you wanna add it in, yeah I am against circumcision. But keep changing the argument

              • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

                RIP little Timmy, he could have lived with chemo but [email protected] doesn’t want children to take drugs.

                • UrPartnerInCrime
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  So I don’t ad life altering drugs one time and you pounce on it? There’s obviously a diffrnence between life altering and life saving drugs. Way to take one except out of context.

                  Gross

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

                So no healthcare for children, got it. No operations for fat boys with moobs, no circumcisions and since you phrase it that way, guess no medication for any other illnesses either, huh? And the reason for this asinine take is the view that you think that children can simply go to a doctors and command them to give them full gender reassignments.

                Your ignorance has been the issue the whole time. You’re afraid of a problem which doesn’t exist and because of that you want to make life miserable for those you pretend you’re looking out for. It’s horrific, tbh.

                “Making up stuff.” Name one.

                And now you’re spamming typos on purpose to even further pretend like you never edited anything to add anything to your comment, despite there being “edit” and “edit edit” and several sentences with those. Who do you think you’re lying to?

                • UrPartnerInCrime
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Making stuff up?

                  you added 17 edits and made your arguemt 600% longer <–Lie your argument changed completely <-- Lie

                  And I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There’s no winnignwith you

                  • Dasus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 hours ago

                    No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.

                    I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

                    You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.

                    You added several sentences. You didn’t just “fix typos”.

                    I also fixed typos after proofreading. Takes a whole of twenty seconds as you can see.

        • UrPartnerInCrime
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I literally went back for Grammer cause I suck at typing.

          And why am in not going aback to answer someone calling me out more, cause I’m arguing on like 4 fronts nown

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So just ignore the timestamps and call me a liar despite knowing you edited the comment and that I answered with a lengthy comment less than 10 minutes after yours had been written, but you still insist I intentionally tried calling you fat?

            You just can’t admit you were mistaken and apologise?

            • UrPartnerInCrime
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              So just ignore that my comment was there and has stayed consistent the whole time. That i.must apologize for going back and fixing errors i made cause inhale bigger fingers. I’m not even going back andcorrextingnanthtungnthis them cause this is how it normally looks befor I gor back.

              You made the mistake by changing the argument and don’t want to admit yoy pivoted, not me.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                and has stayed consistent the whole time.

                It hasn’t. Lie all you want but you had nothing in there about your gender, sex, wants, needs, history, nothing. You simply commented on gender affirming care, then when I pointed out the hypocrisy, you edited it to be literally four times as long.

                • UrPartnerInCrime
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  You’re absolutely lying now, I did not edit it to kake it longer.

                  I literally talked about having a bigger dick as one fo my first things I wrote and added on even before posting.

                  Pure just lying to make yourself seem better

                  • Dasus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    @[email protected] English-3•

                    "I made those edits immediately after posting my argument. "

                    You literally just admitted to having edited the comment a few comments back. Can’t even keep your lies straight.