• BodilessGaze
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I like the quarterstaff, but you know what would make it even better? If you took a sharp piece of metal and put it on one end so you can stab a dude after bonking him. I don’t know what you’d call it though. A staffstab?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    They may stop asking you, but nobody here got old enough to stop raving about their favorite when prompted.

  • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m partial to polearms, and the bec de corbin has always been a favorite. Quarterstaff is nice as well, although I prefer them with less decorations

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean, it’s obviously the flanged mace. It’s the only one that purely serves its purpose as a weapon and not simply a meat tenderizer or hammer.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Maces were great for abusing the peasants and hammering on knights.

      War hammers were god damned crimes. Because the focused blunt end of the hammer can REALLY cause some serious damage. But also? The back is a pick. So you don’t even need to dent the armor and cause bruising. You just pierce a brain on the backhand.

      Which is why the lucerne hammer (bec de corbin above) was the best anti-armor weapon out there. A polearm that can fuck you up three different ways.

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m not someone who’s actually studied medieval combat, but as I understand it while a war hammer was a better weapon than a mace it was also more complicated to use. You’ve actually got to aim and align your strikes, while a mace is just “swing the pointy bits at the guy you want dead.”

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          If you want any degree of force in your swing you are already “aiming and aligning” anything. Its the difference between wailing and actually throwing a punch. A schoolkid throwing a swing might bloody a nose but is probably going to hurt them as much as their target. Someone who knows how to properly make a fist and put their body into it? You don’t need much strength to fuck someone up.

          So, theoretically, you could still do a decent amount of damage on an unarmored civilian using something like a morningstar. But that is almost entirely the spikes.

          If you wanted any hope of causing meaningful damage to an armored opponent or even an unarmored combatant with their adrenaline pumping? You needed to know how to swing your weapon whether it was a mace, a hammer, or a sword. And as long as you hold the weapon correctly, you get hitting them with the fun bit “for free”.

  • The Giant Korean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    The Bec de Corbin is nice for when you aren’t sure if you’re feeling buldgeony or stabby. It’s like the chicken and waffles of the blunt weapon world.