• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1106 months ago

    As a Canadian, I’m incredibly disappointed in my government for supporting this genocide and settling of stolen land. We’re on the wrong side of history with this.

    • @can
      link
      476 months ago

      this genocide and settling of stolen land.

      Guess they’re concerned they’d have to look inward a little?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        216 months ago

        It’s so absolutely insane how Canada is happy to tout reconciliation with First Nations people and simultaneously support the genocide of an indigenous people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      166 months ago

      Generally speaking if Germany votes in favour of this kind of resolution and you against, you done fucked up.

    • @otp
      link
      126 months ago

      Disappointed, sure, but I don’t think you should be surprised.

      Canada was founded as a country specifically for the purpose of genocide. Virtually the entire country is on settled and stolen land. It would be hypocritical to be against someone else doing the same.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        116 months ago

        You could say the same about Australia and various Latin America countries, yet they still condemn Israel action.

        • @otp
          link
          46 months ago

          You’re right, but there’s a reason why Canadians don’t talk about their “founding fathers” the way Americans do.

          I don’t know how many other countries are the same way.

          The first PM was explicitly racist against indigenous people, and IIRC, the country was explicitly founded on the basis of white supremacy over indigenous peoples.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        Canada was founded more than 150 years ago. I’m surprised that in that intervening period, nothing has changed.

  • culpritus [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    536 months ago

    wow it’s actually not the exact same map international-community-1international-community-2

    this seems like a modicum of progress

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      326 months ago

      The crimes of the empire are so blatant now that even the vassals aren’t comfortable supporting them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The idea of a consolidated imperial core is in itself flawed and the idea itself is not applicable to all situations. Though definitely a useful point of view sometimes, using it unconditionally will only deny nuance and differences between core countries, which is not always helpful.

      EDIT: Guessing this will probably get downvoted and/or ignored, but if anyone is actually willing to provide or cite some justification/explanation of the map in question, that would be great. Linking the Wikipedia article, whose map differs and has the reasoning of core countries as

      They are usually recognized as wealthy states with a wide variety of resources and are in a favorable location compared to other states.

      containing several points, which in total are inconsistent by leading to a false dichotomy, is not what I ask and not what I think a map of imperial core states should use for classification.

      My reasoning for calling a consolidated core flawed is among other things because it is not taking into consideration the historic development and relationships between core states. Some classify, for example, Scotland as a semi-core due to these reasons.

        • CommunityLinkFixerBotB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn’t work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          No, this is not an explanation. For something as important as the imperial core, which you claim the map portrays, there needs to be an actual proper definition and reasoning behind it. Having a bunch of loosely corrolated maps is not it. The list of countries that recognize Palestine is also not a proper inverse.

          I am just tired of seeing this map spammed. Once some even ridiculed others for not acknowledgeding it as the de facto definition of imperial core. I think this is especially bad due to having yet to see anyone actually putting any effort into analysis of why it looks like it does. Spewing unsubstantiated ideas is for the incoherent bourgeoisie and fascists.

          • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            276 months ago

            It’s a meme (Moreover, the emote is named “international community” not “imperial core”).

            Hexbear emotes are not rigorous theoretical statements. E.g.: xi-plz

          • culpritus [any]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            No each map is explained on that comm. You assigning it ‘imperial core’ and asking for an explanation is some JAQing off sealioning imo. Theses maps correlate how interests of countries align around various issues, and the ‘same map’ comes up a lot because of how these same countries often agree on things in contrast to the the rest of the world. It’s not some socio-political theory, it’s just the reality of how these countries align into blocs that correlate with maintaining the current US hegemonic status quo.

            The two maps that really ‘explained’ this concept for me were the map of countries that ‘condemn China’s treatment of Uyghur Muslims’ contrasted with the map of ‘countries that recognize Palestine’. It shows how this bloc of countries want to demonize China while supporting the ongoing genocide of Palestine’s indigenous peoples. The principles they espouse are unmasked in the light of the truth of this comparison.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              26 months ago

              Saying I am sealioning is an accusation and not an opinion besides also being wrong. Here is one in return: Acting like the map is not usually considered to portray the imperial core is intellectual dishonesty on your part.

              • culpritus [any]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                13
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                citations-needed

                Whotf talks like this anyway?

                is an accusation and not an opinion besides also being wrong.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  16 months ago

                  First you accuse me of sealioning and then you hide behind an “imo” like that is just your opinion. There is no such relativistic position on an objective matter. You are wrong to claim so and cowardly for disguising it as an opinion. With this in mind it does not surprise me that you stoop even lower with trying to berate me for my style of writing. Who tf acts like that?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    366 months ago

    The settlements have always been recognized as illegal, but I guess its good to reaffirm it.

    Its a war crime to move a civilian population into a military occupied region. This crime has been ongoing for decades.

  • btbt [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    346 months ago

    Jesus fucking Christ even a majority of the anglosphere is opposing Isntrael

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      76 months ago

      We have some populists roping in the hillbillies right now. It’s amazing how well they’re weaponizing stupid and pushing our PM around.

    • velox_vulnus
      link
      fedilink
      176 months ago

      Remember how countries from the global South were threatened with sanctions and pulling investments (ahem, global sweatshops) just for abstaining?

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    286 months ago

    Woohoo … Yeah … Canada vo … ???.. What the hell!

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      96 months ago

      Apartheid regimes stick together. Canada did to First Nations what Israel aims to do to Palestinians.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -5
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The U.S spends more on military than the next 7 countries combined. It’d put up a good fight. Probably conquer Canada/Mexico in hours (I’d assume they would just concede the same way Paris/France conceded to the Nazis in WW2), and then we’d also have the advantage in Eurasia. We could nuke most of western Europe, and the only country that could really stop us is Russia because they also have a comparable number of nukes. If we successfully disarm them and are the sole nuclear super power in the world, I could see the U.S winning ww3 and becoming a global government.

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        286 months ago

        We

        USians stop identifying with those who rule over you Challenge Rating: um ackshully

        If we successfully disarm them and are the sole nuclear super power in the world,

        Sounds super easy

        We need a smuglord but with like a helmet on for people like this

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I don’t support the U.S, and yeah I’ve been actively trying to move away from identifying as part of the U.S. Notice the first time I referred to it in my comment I called it “it”. Just a habit, sorry if I offended you though, that wasn’t my intention.

          The main issue is if I say “they” instead of “we”, the vast majority of the internet assumes you’re from Europe. I want to convey I live in the United States without identifying as part of it.

      • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        166 months ago

        The pentagon pays $5000 on a simple trash can. Paying more money is not a good thing. A f35 costs like $75 million dollars to build and they spend almost half their existence unable to fly.

        USA’s military budget is 90% graft.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        The next seven countries combined (the next eleven, in fact) are all in green in the above map. #12 is Canada, and every other country is either supporting this resolution or abstaining. The US could well win a third world war but it wouldn’t happen the way you say. Nukes won’t be used in conflicts by nation-states, only (and hopefully not) by rogue groups that get their hands on one. Nukes are a deterrent nowadays rather than a weapon.

        • Fogle
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          Canada is also still under the monarchy so it’s not like we could side with America against the world

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          I don’t trust that the U.S will always do the right thing with nukes. Maybe you have unwavering faith in the good heart of the imperialist core to never use nukes in conflicts, I’m not as trusting.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Wait the UK voted in favour? Literally just yesterday they were whining about Pro Palestinian marches in London. Then a bunch of right wing fuck nuggets turned up to fight to the pro Palestinian marches, except they turned up in the wrong place and ended up fighting the police instead.

    I guess they realise their position is untenable on that point. The general public hate them and they know it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      216 months ago

      They are not condemning Israel for the current assault on Gaza. They are condemning Israel for the settlements (which is a blatant war crime that has long been criticized by every country except Israel and the US iirc.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        They are condemning Israel for the settlements

        The illegal settlements that are one of the contributing factors that led to Hamas growing in support.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      It’s becoming impossible to spin this as anything other than a genocide that the west is facilitating at this point.