I’ve been trying to find a good Marxist instance, but Lemmygrad and Hexbear are widely hated. Why is that? Are there any good leftist instances?

  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can’t speak about lemmygrad since the instances I’m on all defederate from it, but Hexbear users have a reputation for being generally aggressive, grating, and immature. It’s like that kid in class who keeps interrupting the teacher because they think they’re funny and clever. e.g., some were screaming at me that I can’t be an anarchist and I know nothing about anarchism since I’m married, replying with third-grade tier memes for some confusing reason

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I fully agree. The problem is when we point out that they’re not leftist, they assume it’s because we conflate leftism with liberalism, whereas this is not the case at all. I think they’re not leftist because their antisocial/anti-human beliefs are antithetical to the concept of community and only serve to derail any chance we have to work together to create a new system. I can’t imagine that anyone who legitimately seeks the goal of a stateless, classless society would behave as they do.

    • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thought I should add it was them informing me that certain countries banning same-sex marriage while endorsing heterosexual marriage is just fine, actually. They espoused an objectively homophobic belief, and when I referenced my own marriage, they switched to calling me ignorant about anarchism. There are anarchist texts exploring the issue and some of the potential problems with traditions like marriage, but it’s not dogma. Nor do I view my own relationship as hierarchical.

      TL;DR They were being objectively homophobic.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This has the energy of a white gay man in a marriage pointing at a trans polycule and calling them homophobic because they said he had a bad take about how bourgeois privileges are more important than positive rights for queer homeless people.

        White gay men wielding their gayness as a cudgel against people who are queerer and more marginalized then them sure is a gross thing to see.

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Your comment is a perfect example of the pants-shittingly off-topic LGBTphobic nonsense I was receiving in the other thread, so thanks for proving my point.

          You … you do realize that trans people and other “queerer” people than me engage in same-sex marriage too, right? And that it’s objectively homophobic for a policy to exist forbidding same-sex marriage while permitting heterosexual marriage? And that not all trans people are poly? I know people that fit all of the above, and every one of them deserves validation, and it would be unfathomably LGBTphobic for me to arbitrarily determine which ones are “queer enough” to be part of the community. You don’t see the problem with this line of thinking, with your entire statement? Of course you do, you’re just being deliberately cruel for your own amusement.

          There it is, folks. Exhibit A

          Edit: That user is a moderator on [email protected]

          I’m unsubscribing immediately! And I blocked and reported that user, too.

          My love is for all the LGBT+ community, and for the straight cis community as well. I just want equity. For anyone who had to read that homophobic comment above, just know that I do care, and I’m here for you.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            And that it’s objectively homophobic for a policy to exist forbidding same-sex marriage while permitting heterosexual marriage?

            Yes!

            Do you acknowledge that some countries like the US which allow gay marriage materially harm lgbt people more than some countries that have banned gay marriage? Or is it only homophobic when it impacts your middle class ass?

            Do you acknowledge that many socialist countries are progressive and moving toward more rights, and just starting from a worse starting point because of violently enforced colonial attitudes from countries that now claim to be progressive?

            Do you acknowledge that Cuba, a socialist nation that you’d accuse of being tankie, is the place where lgbt people have the most material rights?

            Do you acknowledge that communists have led every single queer liberation movement that has forced concessions from ruling governments? Or do you want to whitewash the communists out of stonewall?

            You … you do realize that trans people and other “queerer” people than me engage in same-sex marriage too, right?

            Yes, I’m one of them. And I’d happily give up my right to be married if it would erase queer homelessness, and erase conversion therapy camps, and erase the continual murder of black and indigenous trans women in our society.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you want to hear the punchline? I caught a temp ban for expressing my plan to block their instance as soon as that is made possible for users. I will admit I was a bit harsh in that I said I wanted them to be “effectively silenced,” but this was extremely mild compared to their comments to me.

  • Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are hardline Marxist-Leninists, something that is very rare in the western world even amongst those who identify as leftist or socialist. If their views make you uncomfortable, then you’re not a ML, which is okay.

    Left-wing politics is a very broad spectrum, and a lot of Lemmy users lean towards the more moderate end which brings them into conflict with the more radical communities that are Lemmygrad and Hexbear.

    That’s all there is to it.

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          *depending on what instance you’re on

          They are defederated from a lot of instances, from their own side or the other’s (my instance is defederated from LG and HB defederated itself from my instance)

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s all there is to it.

      That’s it? Nothing about their notoriety for posting pictures of pigs pooping on their balls as part of their lively defense of MLism?

  • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Political views aside, the way they promote their political views is unappealing.

    Look through any of their popular threads. Everyone piles on any comment which doesn’t align perfectly with the agreed perspective.

    • ShouldIHaveFun@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone piles on any comment which doesn’t align perfectly with the agreed perspective.

      Sounds like every popular community on Lemmy. The only difference is the “agreed perspective”.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really.

        In most communities you can at least entice some robust discussion, hexbear just seems sp aggressively intolerant of alternative views.

          • JungleJim
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Love how at the very idea of somebody disagreeing with you, you start throwing up all sorts of topics you know are hot buttons just so you can preemptively slam anyone who has a different perspective than you. Rather than taking a second to teach a single thing about the topics you claim to care about you just flash them like political merit badges to prove you’re in the in-group, and anybody who doesn’t know exactly what one of those things are, or what you think is the truth about it, is worth dismissing out of hand. It’s just a secret handshake that if people don’t parrot it back to you they’re not worth debating. You were never here for healthy debate though. You don’t care about convincing anyone or advancing your causes or ideas. You’re here for the badges.

            • thundercoc@lemm.ee
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              @[email protected] your assessment of @TheAnоnymоuseJо[email protected] is spot-on, highlighting behaviors indicative of a fragile ego and a need for superiority. This individual frequently deflects from central topics, especially when their views are challenged, revealing an inability to handle opposing viewpoints. It’s normal to have differences in opinion, but for TheAnоnymоuseJоker this seems to be an act of war, a mindset that is immature and counterproductive for meaningful online interactions.

              Psychologically, it’s a common fallacy for some individuals to oversimplify complex social interactions, reducing them to mere players in the game of their subjective perception. This viewpoint often ignores the nuanced realities of human behavior and interaction.

              Recognizing these behaviors — deflecting, causing dismay, dismissing, denying, deceiving — is essential in understanding the underlying motivations and responding appropriately to maintain the integrity of the discussion.

                • thundercoc@lemm.ee
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Analyzing me psychologically? That’s an interesting deflection, TheAnonymouseJoker. You claim I’m engaging in deflective and ignorant behavior, yet here you are, quickly labeling and dismissing my points without addressing their substance. It’s quite telling that instead of engaging with the critique, you resort to calling out my account’s age and my supposed affiliations. This tactic of yours, focusing on personal attacks rather than the discussion at hand, really highlights the earlier point about your tendency to dismiss and belittle differing opinions. It seems like any perspective that doesn’t align with yours is automatically considered ‘contextless liberal rants and libel.’ Isn’t that, in itself, a form of intellectual compromise? Let’s stick to the actual content of the discussion, shall we?

              • JungleJim
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                See, this is why people have problems with ML and hexbears. How will you ever bring the revolution when you can’t stop screeching? Nobody wants that. Nobody wants to be around it. You’ll be a revolution of one because nobody can take being around such an abrasive asshole long enough to even listen to their points, much less realize they might be right.

                Imagine somebody walking down the street. They see a poster on the wall of the store they pass. It’s a Starbucks. “Looks tasty, I’m cold” they say. Suddenly, you’re there, shrieking about labor rights and fair trade. You are without a doubt correct, but you’ve scared the person and now they’re annoyed. One of those drones inside with the green hats comes out and sees the situation. They ask the customer to come inside where they’re safe from you, and now they’re buying overpriced drinks from exploited workers produced by exploited farmers etc.

                All because instead of talking to someone like a human, you had to be edgy and witty. You treat real humans the way tv characters talk to each other. On TV the wittiest oneo-liner wins. In real life you have to show a little human compassion, even if you’re faking it or else you alienate who you’re talking to and are left in an echo chamber, alone, or in the case of our imagined scenario the employees may call security or police (agents of oppression, and they’ll probably buy coffee too) on a person harassing potential customers.

                • thundercoc@lemm.ee
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  His tendency to dismiss and belittle differing opinions aligns with the behavior of making jokes at someone else’s expense, a red flag of his intention to demean rather than engage. This approach not only stifles productive discourse but also exposes their inability to appreciate the nuances in complex issues. The mark of a first-rate intelligence is holding two opposed ideas while still functioning, *a capacity *TheAnоnymоuseJоker seems to lack. He demonstrates an inability to see a world where an idea can be both right and wrong, as seen in his black-and-white arguments.

                  You’ll be a revolution of one

                  Ironically, and I quote him:

                  powerless against one many army

                  Furthermore, the consistent denial and projection of his biases onto others underscore his low self-esteem and desire to control and influence the narrative. This manipulation, characterized by deceiving and creating misleading narratives, aligns with the observation that the most argumentative people rarely persuade anyone. Persuasion is an art that requires observation, listening, and inquiry, not blunt force.

              • Kecessa
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s a very mature response

                • thundercoc@lemm.ee
                  cake
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s also crucial to consider the source of advice or criticism. TheAnоnymоuseJоker’s attacks are reminiscent of those who criticize yet have never built anything themselves. Their actions seems more about garnering attention than offering constructive criticism. One cannot be offended by someone they do not respect. It’s important to take advice from those you respect and who contribute positively, not from those who seek to destroy. TheAnоnymоuseJоker should address the need for maturity and constructive engagement rather than dismissive or sarcastic remarks.

          • Gormadt@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ukraine good Russia bad?

            Sorry I don’t side with imperialism.

            Ukraine wants to not be invaded by it’s neighbor, and Russia did so to conquer it in direct contradiction to a treaty it signed when Ukraine gave it’s nukes to Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union. On multiple occasions.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Do you actually believe these things or do you just say them to try to get a rise out of people because I’ve never been able to work that one

              • thundercoc@lemm.ee
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s evident that the your not interested in a genuine exchange of ideas or healthy debate. By rapidly switching topics and using them as shields rather than points of discussion, you’re clearly employing tactics like deflecting and deceiving. These types of methods serve to derail the conversation and assert dominance rather than contribute meaningfully.

                Classic case of using hot-button issues not to educate or enlighten but to create an ‘in-group’ and outcast those who question or differ. This approach isn’t just unproductive; it’s an attempt to manipulate the discourse for personal gratification rather than collective understanding.

                Recognizing these tactics is the first step in not falling victim to them and maintaining the integrity of the discussion

    • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like Lemmy’s version of r/atheism 10+ years ago. Atheism itself is fine, but the sub became an insufferable circle jerk.

    • Radicalized@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Tankie” is a term that’s applied to literally any communist. I’ve heard it used against Trotskyists and fucking social democrats.

      So, what’s actually the problem with them? Are they Maoists? CPC apologists?

      • static@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They like Stalin, Putin , Xi and Kim. And defend everything they do.

        Like WTF? How can a communist defend putin!?

        • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          II hear this constantly, I have yet to see it one time ever by ANY communists on ANY website.

          • static@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Visit a few Ukraine threads, it’s one of the topics the fanatics pile on.
            My point was that tankies are a “special” subset of communists.

            • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I have. I’ve still never seen it. What I do constantly see in those threads is dehumanization of Russian people and calls for mass genocide of them, though. Calling them orcs and talking about how they all deserve to die.

              I don’t believe you, to be honest. One can acknowledge Russian security concerns (like multiple U.S. military officials and many high members of the UN have) without praising Putin. And I’ve still never seen a single communist say anything good about Putin. On any website.

      • magnetosphere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        People who throw the word “tankie” around indiscriminately aren’t using it right. From what I’ve seen, it applies specifically to extreme communist fanboys who are apologists for communist militarism. For example, Tankies will say that the Tiananmen Square massacre was either justified or didn’t happen.

        Just being a fan of communism doesn’t make someone a tankie.

        Edit: see below for an excellent example

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmygrad and Hexbear aren’t “leftist” in the confused sense that Americans usually mean “leftist.” They’re actually leftist in the original sense, meaning that they want to abolish private ownership of the means of production. To the extent they’re “widely hated,” it’s largely because the Anglosphere has been indoctrinated against real, actual socialism their entire lives.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      More often than not, when Americans say leftist they really mean left-liberalism a la Bernie Sanders, which is really center-left at most, and not actually leftist in the original sense, a sense which Americans have forgotten thanks to two Red Scares and the first Cold War.

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s not the part people have an issue with, the part where their users deny genocides, call everyone that has a less extreme left opinion of politics Nazis, end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves and take all critics as personal attacks, that’s what people have an issue with.

      • deur@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Holy shit you got them to brigade your comment. They might as well be bots, I think Chat GPT’s “intelligence” outpaces them.

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          As is tradition! What’s funny is that they’re supposed to be defederated from my instance so I don’t know why they even see my comments… Their admin even called my instance “sh.itsfullof.nazis” in their defederation message because they were angry that they were confronted to people who disagreed with them when they brigaded our administration communities…

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They have a community dedicated to organizing brigades so it’s no surprise that they are brigading their comment

          [email protected]

          The rules in the side bar are very telling

          Of course the last time I mentioned it’s existence with one of my alts I got a 2 week sitewide-ban so this comment probably won’t last long

          Edit: Spleling

      • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Extremely accurate

        I literally netted a 2 week sitewide-ban on one of my alts in this thread for a softer worded take than this

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t know how I managed to escape consequences so far 😂

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Thanks for providing an example of what I was talking about :)

      • Garfield@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        1 year ago

        end up being so “anti-racism” that they’re racists themselves

        anyone complaining about “reverse racism” or “anti white racism” is a complete joke. like boo fucking hoo, someone called you a cracker on the internet, get over it.

        • Kecessa
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Racism has a definition that’s fairly easy to understand and yes people of all colors can be victims and even people of the same skin colour can be racists against one another because racism isn’t necessarily about the color of your skin, it can be about your ethnicity.

          Racism:

          prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism by an individual, community, or institution against a person or people on the basis of their membership in a particular racial or ethnic group, typically one that is a minority or marginalized.

          Ethnicity:

          the quality or fact of belonging to a population group or subgroup made up of people who share a common cultural background or descent.

          If you had taken a crowd of anonymous Germans all dressed the same in 1935, how would you have told who was a Jew and who wasn’t? You wouldn’t have been able to because they were all just white people.

          What do you call it when 100 years ago in a first world white country the population that speaks one official language has an infant mortality rate comparable to that of colonial Africa while the population that speaks the other official language and lives in the same cities has an infant mortality rate comparable to any other first world nation?

          Was the Rwanda genocide not racism because it was two groups with the same skin colour? What about what happened in Yugoslavia?

          My white friend who went to China to study had to sit through multiple explanations by many Chinese student of the levels of intelligence being affected by skin colour and ethnicity and guess what, whites weren’t at the top! “All white people are dumber than Indians who are dumber than Koreans who are dumber than Chinese.” Are you telling me that isn’t racism against white people (and anyone that isn’t Chinese)? Because I sure would hope someone would call me a racist if I was saying the same thing about people of another skin colour or ethnicity!

            • Kecessa
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you’re saying that what the Jews were victim of during WW2 wasn’t racism? Because they certainly were white!

              How about the Irish? The deportation of Acadians? French Canadians seeing their language becoming illegal to teach in Manitoba? The Yugoslav wars?

              By your logic it’s also impossible to be racist towards Chinese and Japanese because man, let me tell you, they can be racist as fuck towards everyone else and they were the ones in power on their side of the world for centuries!

              Racism has a definition and it’s a bad thing no matter who the victim is.

                • Kecessa
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  It’s funny how it’s always the same whenever you’re confronted to arguments. You just insult the other party and leave the scene like you were a hero.

                  Also very funny you should call me a cracker when you don’t know what’s my origin, you just assume I’m white because you would be unable to accept that someone not white could realize that racism goes all ways.

        • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That isn’t what they are talking about, hopefully. But if it is, I agree, a hearty “lol” is in order.

          • Garfield@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            they replied confirming to me that what they were complaining about was in fact racism against white people, given that it seems to be a pretty common bit on lemmygrad to call people crackers and compare them to that kid who went onto fox news to complain about his face being photoshopped onto a picture of a ritz cracker by left wing students at his university that seems to be what they were complaining about

            edit: i found a picture of the guy

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a liberal with no framework. No one denies genocides (pro-tip just because the western media says it’s a genocide doesn’t make it a genocide.) Being so anti-racist you are the real racist is the Liberal Democratic party who elected a hard-core segregationist as president, not a Marxist Leninist. No one except people like you give a fuck about personal attacks. lol.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The “Uyghur genocide” is bullshit Atlanticist propaganda, and English-language Wikipedia is basically NATOpedia in its slant on the topic, so yes we will deny it. It’s a product of the new Cold War propaganda campaign against China.

        • redballooon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Here are some properties of any conspiracy theory worth it’s name:

          • Closed Ideological Systems: They provide an all-encompassing explanation for various events or states, with everything fitting into their worldview.
          • Immunity to Facts: Any contrary evidence is dismissed as false or considered part of the conspiracy.
          • Enemy Construction: They tend to draw a clear line between “us” (those who “know the truth”) and “them” (the supposed conspirators).
          • Adaptability: Conspiracy narratives can change and incorporate new “evidence” or events to maintain their credibility.

          It matches for QAnon and the MAGA crowd as well as the lemmygrad crowd.

    • Big P@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Any politically focused space on the Internet, left or right, is a cesspool of toxic lies and hatred of anyone outside their sphere

  • val@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmygrad I can’t comment on. As far as I can tell they basically just talk politics and I’m not interested in microwaving my brain by obsessing about politics online. Haven’t seen them out in any of the threads I’ve been on.

    Hexbear I’ve enjoyed honestly. They’ve got nice hobby communities and it’s all I’m here for. Quality of discussion is usually pretty good. My take on people hating Hexbear is people have made their personality getting mad about politics and Hexbear don’t share their views. People screaming “tankie!” just seemed deranged to me, literally who cares what a handful of nerds in the US think of China. Neither of you have any influence on what China does at all.

    • UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Sorry for my ignorance, but I think liberal means something else in my part of the world. Can you please tell me what’s your definition?

      Edit: As I thought - you guys mean Neoliberalism. Even in the links below it’s mentioned that there was a split in terms. Language matters! Liberalism - a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights and civil liberties (the opposite in the political spectrum from authoritarianism).

      • Garfield@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        they’re not using liberal in the american sense of liberal meaning gay blue haired woman with pronouns and vegan lattes that conservatives get mad at (in general theres a lot of queer vegan women with pronouns and colourful hair on hexbear); they’re defining liberal in the marxist sense in that its people who support capitalism but arent currently fascists, so this includes conservatives, neoliberals, social democrats, and all sorts in it. Their comment seems to be applying more specifically to the ideologically committed liberals as opposed to mostly apolitical people who just say, “oh yeah i guess i;ll vote democrat this time” once every 4 years and have that be the extent of their politcal consciousness

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s nonsense statements like this that should provide the answer to OP’s question. When push came to shove in WW2, liberalism in the US, UK, and elsewhere sided with communism against fascism.

    • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      even if there was never any official method of communicating the public will.

      What do you mean by this? What kinds of methods do you find acceptable?

      There isn’t any discussion on political theory

      There is absolutely talk of political theory on hexbear. Right now currently there’s a bell hooks reading group pinned to our front page. I’ve learned a surprising amount from my fellow hexbear nerds. People drop reading recommendations constantly and if you make a thread with questions from something you’re reading, you’ll get engagement and answers. It’s pretty cool.

      the focus seems geared on one small part of the political spectrum while ignoring other parts entirely.

      Yes, we’re communists. We aren’t going to pretend liberals are worth engaging with politically. That being said, we are a leftist unity instance, so anarchists, MLs, maoists, what have you are all welcome. As long as you’re an actual leftist and not some “just vooooote” liberal, you’ll probably enjoy hexbear.

        • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, so, first of all, people vote in China. Like, they do. They have elections there. If you’re defining democracy as “a system in which people vote”, then by that definition China is a democracy. (Full disclosure, I don’t think that’s a great definition and I don’t think China is a “liberal democracy” like the US is, but at this point, we’re getting hugely into the weeds of different political systems and I don’t think now is exactly the time for that.)

          Sure, the hexbear posts that make it to the top of the “all” feed aren’t going to be the ones where we’re talking theory, they’re going to be the ones where we’re dunking on people for shitty political opinions. Fair enough. That’s true. It doesn’t mean that theory posts don’t exist, just that they aren’t as contentious as dunking posts. That’s an indictment of the internet and social media, not of hexbear specifically.

          Hexbear does talk about liberals a lot, because they are the political group in power in the west. It’s probably worth pointing out here that (american) republicans are, in fact, also liberals. So when we say “libs suck”, we are also talking about the american republican party. Republicans are more open than the democrats about their genocidal tendencies, but fundamentally, republicans and democrats believe the same things and act in the same ways. They all think capitalism is cool and good, they just have slightly different feelings about which tactics to employ to keep capitalism as the dominant economic system. So it’s not that we ignore republicans, it’s just that it can sometimes look that way to people who think “liberal” means “democrat”. It never has historically, but because political education in the US is so fucking garbage, a lot of people think “liberals” and “democrats” are synonyms.

          And your last point is just wrong. We know that voting is never going to bring about real change, but that doesn’t mean we only want to complain. The usual advice is to get organized. It’s to find a local group that is on the ground helping people and get involved. Start working to build non-governmental power in your local area. Make connections, talk to people, help people, so that when world events are exploitable, we communists are ready to exploit them. It’s fucking hard, especially in the US where our government has spent years and years trying (and mostly succeeding) to make “communism” a dirty word, but just because something is hard doesn’t mean it’s not worth doing. The idea that voting is something that will affect change is laughably incorrect. We could get into it, but let me just point out that the electoral college exists and that in my lifetime there have been not one, but two presidents who have been elected to office even though they lost the popular vote. Does that sound like a system in which the mass of voting people can bring about real change?

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t come across as a group wanting to make change, but complain.

          And what the fuck are you doing here? Besides implying some magical “solarpunk solutions” to a planet being on fire and increasing choked with plastic (that probably don’t involve abolishing capitalism because that would be a scary Hexbear thing to do) without specifying what those supposed “solutions” are what are you doing here besides complaining about Hexbear?

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some form of vote. And this isn’t an argument on which system is better or not, just a definition of democracy compared to other forms of government.

          People do vote in China. You know that, right? Xi is not elected directly by popular vote but is essentially voted on by politicians who were voted in, something closer to a parliamentary style organization rather than the US system. If Xi was unpopular, the people could vote out the people supporting him in favor of challengers who support someone else for President.

      • socsa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Leftist unity, but only for the authoritarian left. Hexbears either intentionally ignore or are not aware of the academic case for democratic socialism or other moderate/libertarian left ideas. You just redefine them as liberalism because actually acknowledging that these ideas might liberate workers faster than the often failed journey through autocracy, is very inconvenient for campism.

    • Grimble [he/him,they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the most “Portland Antifa Bookstore” thing I’ve read all week. You’re not more “principled” or “balanced,” you just want certain things to replace other things, (solarpunk lol), and you’re fully committed to avoiding the easy solution at all costs. Comfy Americans who want to stay comfy with no tough moral decisions ever make the worst kinds of leftists.

    • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      talk of political organization outside of violent revolution is frowned on

      Then why do so many people talk about how they are voting for PSL? Admittedly that’s mostly on Hexbear, but if anything I think we have too much electoralism and too many LIB s.

    • jack [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      We are watching an actual genocide unfold in Gaza right now and it is impossible for Israel to hide it from the world. When will we finally get a single image from China depicting this so called Uyghur genocide? There’s not one image of death camps, mass graves, or dead bodies. How on earth is that possible? Internet access is extremely widespread in China.

    • HornyOnMain [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There isn’t any discussion on political theory

      there;s currently an ongoing bell hooks reading group, we just finished the wretched of the earth reading group, the daily megathread comes with a list of recomended works of anarchist and marxist theory, there are pretty frequent requests in the askchapo comm for works of theory on specific topics, the matrix room has its own pretty active theory discussion page, one of the recurring site taglines is a command telling the reader to read theory with a link to where to see it, and if you spend anytime at all active on the site someone will yell at you to read Settlers (ive actually seen people recomend this one so much that i actually know the url from the top of my head), The Jakarta Method, Blackshirts and Reds or Trans Liberation: Beyond Pink and Blue

      edit

      while refreshing the page for an example of the tagline’s telling the reader to go read theory coming up i saw this that you might find funny

      ok, here are some actual ones telling the reader to read theory:
      \

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      because it is geared in part towards solutions

      “Just voooooooote for le green energy broooooo this time it will work broooooooo just vooooooote broooooooo” morshupls

    • Luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hexbear in particular has been annoying in the past with nonsense comments from users there, and so many unhelpful replies that are just a tiny animated image and nothing else. I’m not even sure they actually are leftist as much as just trolls a lot of times, so I’ve blocked the instance in general so that serious leftist conversations aren’t being drowned out by that nonsense.

      If it looks like someone from hexbear (such as yourself here) is making a real contribution then I’ll reveal that comment and engage. It’s a shame there are so many goofballs on that instance, apparently. Maybe their moderation has improved though?

      • Doubledee [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there was a culture shock when federation first hit. We had a ton of ‘engagement’ from people who were using ableist, racist, and transphobic slurs, which brought out strong reactions from our community because we believe its important to shut that stuff down on solidarity with our comrades. And as things got heated I think our willingness to believe people wanted good faith debate eroded.

        We do love a good dunking though, and I think overall the community has a lower threshold for going full pig poop balls on people than I would prefer.

      • spectre [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Valid criticisms tbh (I even could say the same as a day 0 account lol)

        Moderation isn’t going to “improve” because they generally are fine with everyone being goofballs, so I wouldn’t expect that.

        Some people have the cascade of shitposting and useless emojis coming with their crappy views, but I don’t think our instance is great at propaganda or ROE, which is unfortunate. Would love to see what we could do with a little discipline.

        Also the emojis on every other instance and all mobile apps look more obnoxious because they don’t downscale to their intended resolution.

      • livus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        so many unhelpful replies that are just a tiny animated image and nothing else

        Here on kbin I don’t even see that, just text links with names like “pig poop balls”.

      • fred@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How did you manage to block the instance individually? I thought that feature wasn’t released yet…?

        • Luke@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m using Connect which has the feature to block instances. It shows comments from all users on a blocked instance collapsed behind a spoiler of sorts that can be clicked to reveal if desired.

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a leftist that doesn’t like hanging with racists and totalitarians, that’s why I don’t like them.

  • spauldo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I believe you’ve answered your own question.

    Lemmy isn’t Marxist-only. The majority of Lemmy users are what the more vocal Lemmygrad and Hexbear users deride as “libs.” As a thought experiment, imagine that you are one of us for a moment and then browse Local on one of those.

  • LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmygrad isn’t “hated” by most of the wider lemmyverse. There’s just a loud and obnoxious minority of people that will rail and rant about lemmygrad. They loudly rant about lemmygrad because they aren’t used to seeing their worldview get challenged and by its very nature as a radical leftist community, lemmygrad is a challenge to the typical background liberal perspective.

    It’s no surprise we all end up seeing a lot of threads about “those mean tankies at lemmygrad” (and hexbear too) made by people who can’t take their worldview getting questioned, or even shown to be flawed, or just not standing up to their own scrutiny, and who get mad when that happens. There are also of course people with ideological reasons to demonize leftwing politics and will spread shit for that reason alone. But overall, I don’t think most people care enough except to think “oh yeah that’s that instance with those radical lefties, they’re weird but they do make some great memes sometimes.”

    • Kecessa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s a difference between challenging other people’s opinions and calling them fascists or Nazis just because they’re not at the extreme left.

      Even worse, in this very thread I’ve been called a fascist for the sole reason that my instance is sh.itjust.works, one of the bigger instances and one where your political opinion isn’t a criteria to subscribe (especially not when I subscribed, they didn’t even ask for an email!)

      • u/unhappy_grapefruit_2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They aren’t “nazis” they might prehaps be classed as “facists” “alot of members on lemmygrad and hexbar want a one party conumimist state” but my god are they fucking extreme the entire lot of erm are absolute cunts. I personally as a believer of freedom of speech think they should be allowed to say these things although that doesnt mean that there free from societal consequences if someone doesnt want to associate with then thats fine and dandy .they are entitled to an opinion they’re entitled to share that opinion with the world and so are you although… they’re fucking cunts alright

      • snugglesthefalse
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I only joined shitjust works because that’s where the cdda Lemmy is and that’s the first thing I used it for, didn’t even know people think it’s a political instance. Though I guess with the hexbears and lemmygrads everything’s political somehow. That’s why I generally avoid dealing with them anyway.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are people who called the main lemmy.ml instance a community of tankies, so I’d take a lot of these claims with a grain of salt.

    • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty left/lean socialist. The tankies that annoy me from those instances are pro authoritarian communists who say shit like “Stalin did nothing wrong” with no irony whatsoever. It’s not really about bickering over ideological purity past a certain point, some of that shit makes a good case for the horseshoe theory

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just take a look at this question, all of the answers are from lemmygrad and hexbear users. You are not going to get a good answer from them because they’re the people you’re asking the question about.

    They are not hated they’re just annoying, no one really cares about their opinions the problem is is that they try and push their opinions on everybody else.

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, they have a very alternative interpretation of geopolitics and they’re loud about it. If there was a flat earth instance with users that spammed every physics thread there would be some grumbling just the same.

    • LilB0kChoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hexbear and lemmygrad users/posts I run across in All mostly remind me of those street corner preachers. I don’t care one way or another about their ideologies but it’s tiring that they always feel the need to shout it in your face.

      I don’t hate them but find them to be obnoxious and mostly cult-like.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, when I see a .ml user from here on out I’m not sure I’ll be able to give them the same sort of leeway.

      I had one of their users confirm they were racist. Then I saw that only the parts where our conversation was removed by mods, and not shit canning the user.

      You want people to like you, don’t lie down with racists.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I concur about .ml. It’s been eye opening being on the receiving end of a homophobic rant by a moderator of their world news community implying I’m not queer enough. It wouldn’t surprise me that they’re racist, too. Bigots tend to subscribe to more than one strain of bigotry.

        I know it shouldn’t matter what people like that think, but I’d be lying if I said I’m not disappointed and dismayed. I’ve survived so many things and had a long hard road to self-acceptance. It’s disgusting to be invalidated by someone who likely has more than I’ve ever had.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I used to be confused when right wing nutjobs would say that the left is Racist, or Homophobic, or bigoted in general, it would make me confused as that wasn’t my experience and it’s not baked into left wing ideology. Hell, I didn’t really see it on reddit when I was there (the hate was from right wingers or gatekeepers).

          Then I came here. Nice place in general. Waaaay better users than reddit as a whole. But now I know where the RWNJs got the idea.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ain’t that the truth! I will say during my tenure on reddit, I heard of CTH and thought to myself, “I ultimately support a similar vision for our future, how bad can it be?” I was shocked to find one of the most exclusionary, bigoted dens of filth I’d seen outside of places like r/T_D

            Ableist and bigoted language abounded, it was impossible to engage because they’d immediately bristle when anyone they perceived as beneath them wandered in.

            I see a lot of the same things here. It’s really disappointing to us leftists who actually want to effect change. No one will listen to people like that. Hopefully they’re just kids who grow out of … whatever this is.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Middle class white gay men could use their privilege to help out the rest of the lgbtq community instead of being right wingers, but then that would require examining their privileges, and we can’t have that.

          So pointing out those privileges and how different rights affect different subsections of the community differently because of those privileges is homophobic./s

          Fuck off.

  • macabrett[they/them]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re both good instances. People have been heavily propagandized to hate communists. You could make the kindest most welcoming space on the internet and if you put the label “communist” on it, it will be hated.

  • fred@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I haven’t seen or maybe haven’t noticed much of lemmygrad. But hex bear has a culture of spamming the same handful of images, using them like punctuation in their posts. And they show up huge in my reader at least (I just found out they look small to them.) So it’s like you’re trying to have a discussion and someone comes parading through with like five crappy drawings that take up all the space. Also I don’t mind having Marxists around but they tend to want to steer every discussion toward it, regardless of its relevance. Can’t wait to be able to block the instance.