• Kecessa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Had a friend who pretty much did that, she came back to no job and went from making $65k+ with 4 weeks off a year to making minimum wage with 2 weeks off a year… She lost the means to travel in the future in order to travel one extra week that year…

    • unmagical@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If your PTO can be denied you never had the means to travel in the first place.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Or maybe some people need to recognize that for regular vacations (i.e. not unpredictable occurrences like a sudden death) their employer needs to make sure there’s a minimum number of employees working so it’s something that needs to be arranged with them.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It is up to the employer to make sure to hire enough employees to do the job.

          Not on the employees.

          There is always a chance that an employee can’t make it for whatever reason. If your business fails because of that, it shouldn’t exist anyway.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Does your employer have a backup for all employees to be able to replace them in case they go on vacation without warning them? They have multiple backups for all positions to cover for both people who asked to go on vacation and in case someone decides to just leave without justification?

            Had she been sick it would have been one thing, but just leaving on vacation and warning your employer hours before you’re scheduled to work is opening the door to be fired and it’s 100% deserved.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Then it’s a crap job. Or there were other times she did it too many times. If it’s just once and you have it planned and paid, the job should work with you somehow. If it’s every other week that’s a different story.

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yeah, it was a pattern with her but even then, just leaving without warning the boss so they don’t have the chance to find someone to take over? That’s a perfectly fine reason to fire someone even with strong labor laws like we have around here. Hell, even the union didn’t want to touch that case with a 10’ pole.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right but you should have said that first. The point of the post is not specifically to blindside your employer, IMO.

          • Kecessa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            As I said, it doesn’t need to be a pattern for it to be a valid reason to fire an employee, you’re going AWOL.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              The reason she was fired was not because she took time off, but because she didn’t disclose her time off.

              Big difference.

              • Kecessa
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Correct, she up and left on a last minute trip and asked for time to off after the fact, was told it was impossible to make things fit in the quota and she said it was impossible for her to go to work since she was thousands of kilometres away.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Guess that first job was still worse to work at.

      What is the point of having 4 weeks off if you can’t take them up on it? Might as well not exist.

      So 2 weeks > 0 weeks

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Why do you assume we couldn’t take them exactly? With our weird schedules I would end up getting 10 weeks off every year working for the same employer.

        She just decided to leave, called after the fact, was told that the quota was full for that week and she said “Well, it’s too late, I’m halfway across the world!”