• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    The United States has maintained longstanding support to NATO. Most recently, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, enacted on December 22, 2023, prohibits the President from unilaterally withdrawing from NATO without approval of a two-third Senate super-majority or an act of Congress.[71] This bill was a response to Donald Trump’s repeated expressions of interest in withdrawing from the organization.[72][73]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_NATO#United_States

    That link also claims the Greens want out of NATO, so I guess they see eye-to-eye with Trump on that one? Honestly, it makes me less likely to support the Greens now that I know that.

    • Heresy_generator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      108
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      The Green Party in the US is just an extension of the Kremlin aimed at peeling votes away from Democrats in key races.

        • Thorry84@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          50
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          What are you talking about? Every “green” party I know in Europe is very much against the war in Ukraine and holds Russia responsible. They are about as anti Russia as it gets. Green parties are also very much pro Europe, they want a stronger Europe with more members and cooperation in the EU. Green parties are either center-left or totally left leaning. Green parties usually get a big chunk of votes, not only marginal like in the US.

          Russia is heavily funding and supporting the right and far right parties, who are almost all against a unified Europe. Russia is doing their best to break up the EU with campaigns of misinformation, bots, advertising and direct/indirect funding of right wing political parties.

          And Russia is succeeding as well with the far right on the rise all over Europe. They already got Brexit through against all odds and are now working on breaking up the rest. In Germany the rise of the right is still fresh, so there is a lot of resistance. But other countries are much less resistant.

          • rayyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            8 months ago

            Russia is heavily funding and supporting the right and far right parties

            Welcome to the new warfare that caught the west totally off-guard. The “poorly educated” were the first casualties and have been recycled into the Russian forces.

            • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m genuinely curious if there is no way to stop all/most of these influence & astroturf ops, will we just see a walled off internet with hefty firewalls or content moderation at national ‘borders’? It’d be a huge upheaval to the internet, but otherwise we’re stuck trying for a 100% defense against state cyber attacks

              • cygon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                My personal take here is that playing defense is a losing game and that we really need to kick off another 1968 movement. A counter culture that is infecting and firmly against Russia and conservatives.

          • Draghetta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thanks for the info. I admit my experience was based on the Italian greens who are irrelevant and generally left leaning, which in Italy means Russophile like anything left of the dems, and on what I know of the German greens, which is that they lobbied for getting rid of clean energy and ramping up the use of coal / gas / petrol, all Russian imports.

        • cygon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          8 months ago

          I don’t know about other European countries, but Germany’s greens have kept a relatively tidy ship compared to other parties.

          Which is why Russia is puppeteering Germany’s far-right to view them as a kind of combined enemy, you often hear them use the term “Linksgrunversifft” / “left-green-soiled” towards people who hold the wrong opinions.

          Didn’t they push a similar joined term in America 2016? I remember encountering the words “liberal elite” a lot, probably an attempt to redirect the resentment against the uppity conservative establishment towards liberals instead. I guess it worked.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The US Greens are largely subsidized by Republican funders, and Green presidential candidates have been dinner guests of Putin. The US Greens aren’t an independent environmentalist party but are a GOP stalking horse.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 months ago

                Well… there’s two possible ways you could have found out for yourself-

                1. You could have just clicked the link and saw which Green Party I was talking about.
                2. You could have read your own headline and figured it out.
                • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I read the link and there are references to greens in several countries. And I suppose I could have assumed you were talking about the US, but I’ve never heard of a Green Party in the US.

                  Now I’m sorry I asked. Holy crap.

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    8 months ago

    It would backfire like Brexit. Imagine the USA openly shunted by all former allies about their war crimes and other international crimes. The US forgets they currently can get away with a lot, and they do, because they are also an important ally. If you remove their NATO support, what reason is left to whistle ignorance?

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      The US forgets they currently can get away with a lot, and they do, because they are also an important ally

      I think it’s only Trump who forgets this not the US. I am not even sure he understands it really

      • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not only Trump.

        It’s also Trump voters and voters who stay at home and let him back into office.

        I’ll be pleasantly surprised if a majority of American voters turn out against him.

        Last time it was about 1 in 3 voted for him, 1 in 3 voted against him, and 1 in 3 didn’t show up.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Brexit was a disaster because the UK economy was third-place-and-shrinking in the economic block. They had no leverage.

      NATOXIT would be a much bigger deal, because the US is the premier global military power and the single largest exporter of weapons and associated tech.

      Also, the NATO thing is pure bluster in order to assert leverage over the bloc, while Brexit was a dog-catching-the-car scenario. The Tories invented so many fictions about how awful EU membership was that they couldn’t accept what generous concessions were offered. Meanwhile, Trump will happily take a big personal kickback for a small concession on arms sales.

    • gun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The US getting held accountable for it’s war crimes? Sounds too good to be true.

      • n3m37h
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, can y’all vote Trump meow?

        /S kinda

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Backfiring to Boris looks a lot different than backfiring to Trump. Boris Johnson, even though he’s a piece of shit, still cares about England. Trump only cares about himself and would let Putin waltz right into the War Room if he wanted to.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        Don’t know what consumer base you’re referring to, but other than the wealthy keeping the economy afloat by maintaining their expenditures on creature comforts, most people in America are broke as fuck.

      • wanderingmagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not about Europe. It’s about the massive fuckton of TS//SCI shit shared directly with FIVE EYES and NATO, which shows the exact locations of US strategic nuclear weapons, strategic weapons protocols, intelligence gathering techniques and sources, etc that can almost immediately be sent directly to Russia and China as soon as the US walks out the door. It’s about the first line of defense missile detection radars, the cryptologic keys, Global Campaign Plans, Contingency Plans, PBNZ coordinates, non-overflight coordinates, FLAGWORDS, etc.

        And that’s not all - you also lost all international trade, everywhere, forever. Bye-bye middle eastern oil and Chinese manufactured goods, because all your oh-so-friendly shipping lanes and freedom of the seas is now contested waters full of could-be-privateers. If the EU, by pure necessity, pivots Eastward into a pan-Eurasian bloc, that’s game for the US.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Look man, if nothing else, we’re subsidizing your insane deficit spending and keeping you from hyperinflation by keeping USD as currency reserves. The EU and the US are comparable sized economies, and I could also say the EU is held back a lot by the still present divisions across its members. An external rallying event would most likely catapult integration and economic and military strength.

            All that said, there is no reasonable way forward for the US or the EU without keeping the current world order, which means keeping a strong alliance. If the US and the EU decide on a trade war, that would most likely mean insane inflation and economic breakdown, and a Chinese new world order.

            So let’s stop comparing dick sizes, get all our fucking fascists back in their holes, and let’s try making a friendly alliance work?

      • jaemo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        So, you cool if Canada nopes out of NORAD too then? Gonna use smoke signals for your DEW?

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      But remember, vote for Biden and not for Trump. If you play nice and behave, a group of unknown people that you didn’t vote for might actually vote for Biden so he can stay president for another 4 years. If you voted for Trump, I guess that group of electoral college people might care enough to still vote for Biden? But who cares anyway. Neither Biden nor Trump actually do anything. They just tell the rest of us to do as they say…I’m being sarcastic, vote Biden! Please! Electoral college dudes… because we know you’re all dudes … Please could you just vote for Biden this time?

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They need to get past the Senate filibuster.

        But the real problem is a Commander in Chief who doesn’t want to fulfill treaty obligations. Congress doesn’t have a mechanism to force that, just impeachment which we’ve seen fail already. So while we can’t officially leave, we aren’t going to be participating under him either.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      Implying checks and balances will apply to “only 1 day” dictator Don.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      So what happens if he just says not to go help NATO if article 5 is invoked (if that’s the one where a member is attacked)? Doing nothing seems more up his alley anyways, pulling out requires more work so he’ll probably just say no if it’s needed.

      I got no idea if the US armed forces can deploy without the president’s approval in some way or if Trump says no go then it’s completely off. Been wondering as a NATO neighbor who’s country he called a security threat his first term.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure, with Kaine’s and Rubio’s bill from December, it now requires Senate approval. But all Trump really needs to do is to say that the US won’t help its allies, which is what he’s doing. And since NATO is based on deterrence, he’s effective undermining trust in NATO as an alliance. The winners are Russia and China.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    For those that want to break everything, this is a feature, not a bug. The magats would rather send the world into the toilet rather than not be able to “own the libs” (and women, and POC, and LGBTQ and immigrants, and anyone with one iota more education than them, etc.).

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The magats would rather send the world into the toilet rather than not be able to “own the libs” let their opponents have any success or peace

      With the text adjustments above, it’s clearly something they’ve learned from their Russian mentors.

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    any Party may cease to be a Party [of NATO] one year after its notice of denunciation has been given to the Government of the United States of America, which will inform the Governments of the other Parties of the deposit of each notice of denunciation

    “America? It’s America, we quit”

    Euro confusion intensifies

    • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      — Hello America, we need to talk.

      — Sure America, what’s going on?

      — Not on the phone, this is very important.

      — Where do you want to meet?

      — Somewhere public.

  • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Trump will do whatever is in his power to do, legal or not. As long as Putin tells him he is in the tough guy maffia club, ensuring him that he is invincible.

  • n3m37h
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good, then NATO can charge the US with war crimes since they will no longer be an ally. Get fucked