At least on the communities i follow. Every so often I come across a thread where i recognize most of the users there even in the big communities with over 30k members and I haven’t even been on lemmy that long.

  • inbeesee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The ratio of commenter/poster to lurker is always pretty lopsided. I also never read user names.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The majority of individuals on platforms like Lemmy—and social media more broadly—engage almost exclusively as passive consumers. Their involvement often begins and ends with the simple act of upvoting or downvoting content. This limited interaction speaks volumes about the nature of digital engagement, where consuming information or entertainment takes precedence over meaningful interaction or contribution. The absence of deeper engagement is not a failing of the platform itself but a reflection of broader societal tendencies.

    People, in general, tend toward passivity, a trait that extends beyond online spaces and into areas like civic participation. In the United States, for example, voter turnout remains notoriously low. People express their dissatisfaction with the status quo, they crave change, and they criticize institutions, yet they shy away from taking the minimal steps required to enact that change, often hiding behind a hand-waving comment involving the words “systemic,” “structure,” and/or “institutions,” a transparent way of excusing their unwillingness to actually act. As though they themselves are not parts of those systems, structures, and institutions. The same individuals who will upvote or downvote content online without a second thought are often the ones who abstain from voting in elections, an “upvote/downvote” that directly impact their lives.

    What is even more concerning is that this passivity is not merely a result of laziness or apathy, but something ingrained and encouraged by modern society. Our institutions—whether educational, political, or corporate—tend to value compliance over initiative. Decision-making, once seen as a marker of personal agency and responsibility, is increasingly viewed as a burden. People have been conditioned to prefer being told what to do rather than take responsibility for their choices.

    If a decision goes wrong, there’s an inherent comfort in being able to place blame on someone else. This social conditioning makes being passive, fading into the wallpaper, not only acceptable but desirable for many. And yet, these same people will often feel deeply dissatisfied with their lives. But, rather than do something about it, they continue to be helpless, wishing someone would decide for them to improve their lives and then forcing them to do it.

    While it’s easy to express frustration with the passive nature of online participants, it is also, sadly, understandable. They are products of a society that rewards inaction more than action, where engagement is often reduced to the simplest and least effortful gestures. These platforms reflect the broader societal trend toward disengagement from real, consequential decision-making, reinforcing and reflecting a vicious cycle of passive impotence while they wait for someone or something to fix things for them.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      I disagree about the value of commenting and posting. If I don’t have anything to actively contribute, and I know it, I’m doing you a favor by STFU. Entertainment and disengagement have nothing to do with it.

      If I’m using this platform as a news aggregator, that’s 100% passive and legitimate and respectable.

  • Nyanix@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Honestly, that’s one of the cool parts of old internet (forums, chatrooms, etc.) is getting to know people, you get to know the community 😊

  • Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Kinda yeah. BUT my comment to lurk ratio is still less than I did on Reddit. So even my few contributions are still more than I ever really did on Reddit.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Most people are probably pretty passive, so yeah, I think there’s a subset of posters who are highly visible. But even over at Hacker News, where there’s a much larger audience commenting, I recognize specific names because something they said in the past got my attention and I start piecing together their personality a bit at a time.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yeah, that’s what you get with smaller communities, you tend to see the same people over and over.

    • k_rol@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And I kind of like it. We get to know who is worth reading and who isn’t, for the frequent posters at least.

    • TheBrideWoreCrimson@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I used to be active on one of my country’s most popular forums, if ranked by daily visits. Self-help Q&A style. Apart from me, there were pretty much only three users contributing about 90% of the content. One of them being the only mod. It took me years to figure out, from the timing and the writing style of the posts, that this mod also poses nearly all of the questions and gives all of the first answers too, using a new single-use sock puppet each time.
      At the start of this year, it devolved into plain attention whoring and it was really sad, so I left.

  • dosaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I almost never comment on anything. I imagine most users are like me.

    Yes, I do see the same names popping up all the time.

      • Shark03@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Not the person you asked but another lurker. Social interaction is hard, even posting this I’m having second thoughts about it, but I still like to feel like a member of the community.

        • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          My published comments are probably about 20% of comments I start. I just give up most of the time because it wasn’t important or I can’t word something how I like in the moment

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Congratulations to you on interacting! I agree with everything you said.

          I’m certainly not one of the lemmy celebrities, but I’ve got nearly 900 comments on lemmy where I doubt I had 100 on Reddit. Not going back to check.

          Lemmy is a just nicer place to comment than Reddit: smaller audience, kinder communities, much less intimidating. I don’t consider there to be any pressure to make posts or to comment, but if you do, I doubt you’ll regret it.

          Either way, I personally am happy to have you here.

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I see you everywhere and I enjoy it. Thanks for contributing to all the conversations. O7

    • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      some of those are also the same kind of power tripping neckbeard discord mods we fled from by leaving reddit. (fragile ego ban incoming in 3…2…1…)

      • Today@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I don’t understand what neck beard means. I see it used, but I still can’t really figure out what it means. The other thing I don’t understand is incel, not that you used that word but it’s another one that I see used frequently that I don’t understand. Are the two related? Also, I’m old In case you couldn’t tell

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Neckbeards: having “facial” hair that basically only covers the neck. It’s the idea that these guys who don’t have the facial hair to grow a full beard have poor hygiene.

          Incel: Involuntary Celibate, shortened to incel. Someone who can’t get laid for one reason or another. The propblem being the people who generally self-identity as incel, who are usually toxic and sexist.

          These aren’t necessarily linked, but incels are usually the type to have such poor hygiene as to have a neckbeard.

          • Today@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Ohhhh. Thank you!

            I thought neckbeard referred to a hipster beard. That makes more sense now.

            Weirdly, sex has changed in the last couple of decades. When i was young (back in my day 🤦) women could get laid anytime they wanted and men had to put in a little effort. So when i hear involuntarily celibate, i just think ‘don’t be a dick. You’re gonna have to work a little for it,’ but i guess they’re not getting any because they’re misogynistic?

            • shani66@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Lots of people just can’t or don’t get laid for plenty of reasons, shyness or some kind of disinterest does not an incel make. An incel is mostly synonymous with what you probably think of when you hear basement dweller, but inverse the elitism and with an added sexual element. extreme misogyny, extreme entitlement towards women, extreme resentment towards the sexually active, occasionally fixated on the idea of masculinity, and overwhelming self hatred.

        • avguser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          From Wikipedia:

          “Neckbeard” is a pejorative term and stereotype for an adult man or teenage boy who exhibits characteristics such as social awkwardness, underachievement, or pretentiousness.

          And incels are described as:

          An online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active.

          Certainly not related communities but could conceivably overlap. Not surprising that a lot of Internet trolls fall into one of those categories.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        the same kind of power tripping neckbeard discord mods

        I’ll never understand the intense and visceral anger some people on the internet have towards facial hair. Also really leaning into the 4chan-esque Everyone Online Is Dudes trope.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Because a neck beard isn’t facial hair. It’s neck hair. Neckbeards are usually indications of poor hygiene rather than some appreciation of facial hair

          • klemptor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I can’t believe I’m defending neckbeards but…hey if Ringo Starr can rock the neckbeard, it’s not all bad!

            And I’m sure loads of people with neckbeards have overall poor grooming and hygiene, but I’m also sure plenty have good hygiene.