• SomeAmateur
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 小时前

    In my experience people who are against more Ukraine aid think that the dollar amount we send is actual cash that can be spent in other places, rather than pallets of munitions that don’t keep forever anyway.

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 小时前

      It’s literal economic stimulus, US sends them old shit, and buys new and more expensive shit from local military suppliers. This is the “creating jobs” thing the right likes so much, except when it’s against Russian interests

      • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 小时前

        Yes, but it is really inefficient. If we simply ignore the nuke threat it would probably take the US a month of bombing to restore pre 2014 borders.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 小时前

      And a part of that is old stuff that would be decommissioned so the cash is to make the new products. Or so I have understood it.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 小时前

        nah that’s right. we’ve sent ukraine a shit ton of basically decommissioned shit. and even then we’ve been weirdly stingy, and unresponsive to their non military aid requests (their biggest ask is glass)

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 小时前

        And we’re also saving a bunch on disposal costs for the old stuff.

    • taladar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 小时前

      Even for new weapons and ammo it is usually just spending on the local weapons manufacturers so basically just supporting your own economy.

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      11 小时前

      This is the most obscene attempt to understate the US’s involvement in the war in Ukraine I’ve ever seen.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          33
          ·
          11 小时前

          Not always, but it’s the fault of the USA far more than it should be. Like a pants shittingly stupid amount of the time. Almost as pants shittingly stupid as Americans who pretend that isn’t the case.

          • ShadowRam@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 小时前

            It’s USA’s fault Russia annexed Crimea? and now attempting to annex more?

            How’s that?

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            10 小时前

            Eaglestan has been known to start weird unnecessary wars, but this is not one of them.

            (I personally can’t really comment on surplus vs. new in detail, though)