• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Netflix didn’t get greedy (well not in that way). The movie companies wanted to make their own platform, which would have left Netflix with nothing. So they had to become their own production company. They said “we have to become a production company faster than production companies become streaming companies”.

  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I feel like people are ignoring that Netflix was bleeding money during their “golden age”. They only switched to being profitable a couple years back. A lot of times what people describe as enshittification is just unprofitable companies having to come up with an actual business model as venture capital dries up.

    Also, merry Christmas:)

    • julietOscarEcho
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      Netflix has a market cap of 300bn. Public markets picked up right where venture capital left off no bother. The problem I think was the competitive forces as much as enshitified business model, though perhaps one cannot exist without the other. Certainly without doing their own content they could easily have become ludicrously profitable as a redistributer only, though I’m not convinced it would have stopped everyone and their dog moving in on the space.

      Facebook is really the cleaner example of enshitification. They could have happily printed modest money for ever as the preeminent social network, but they took the greedy approach and morphed into a cesspool.

      Merry Christmas to you!

      • AEsheron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Theu saw the writing on the walls. They knew the big dogs would want a slice of the streaming game and they needed to pivot before the rug got pulled out from ubder them. Hulu was already being constructed when they were recalling shifting into making their own products IIRC. It wasn’t just VC that got them to their golden era, they also relied on the industry bot taking streaming seriously enough and giving them deals that they never would today.

    • Bacano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You can also argue that silicon valley has that particular business model of purposely making a product look great and cheap until enough people sign up.

      It’s distinct from how most companies run in the red at their inception in that those traditional businesses would gladly be in the black but are waiting for economies of scale or building a reputation among consumers.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        And that’s probably why people get so disappointed w/ tech companies.

        It’s not that the prices they switch to are unreasonable, but that they hike prices after getting a user base, so it feels like a bait and switch instead of an early bird discount. If they made it an actual early bird discount, people would probably be fine with it.

        Or maybe they keep prices the same, but drop content while keeping prices the same. If they instead structured it as a base tier and an “early bird” free access to a higher tier, which then starts costing money after some time period, I also think people would be okay with it. I have always thought Netflix should have packages, so you could opt-in to additional stuff like maybe Disney or HBO content. If Netflix did this early on, maybe Disney and HBO wouldn’t have bothered making their own streaming platforms and instead just raked in revenue from these higher tier customers, because they get most of the benefit of having their own streaming platform, with none of the costs.

        In pretty much every case, I’ll point to Valve’s business model as an example. Gaming companies generally don’t feel the need to run their own platforms, and the ones that do often still distribute through other stores.

  • stinky@redlemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I want to watch Dark Matter without a million popups, malware or shady “trust me bro” programs.

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      FMHY (Free Media Heck Yeah) has a pretty solid guide for beginners on how to find most forms of media safely.

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 minutes ago

      Kodi + Fen Light plugin + Alldebrid + Trakt account. This setup is the easiest for people who don’t want to torrent or setup a NAS. It’s basically a pirated streaming service with the highest quality of streams. Alldebrid is a paid for service though but it is super cheap.

      • stinky@redlemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        oh sorry, I thought this was the piracy community. my question would have suggested that I wanted to learn how to do it, if I was there.

  • quixotic120@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Except people aren’t necessarily going back to piracy en masse

    Torrent sites are dwindling, even the big ones have sad membership numbers compared to 10yrs ago

    A large amount of internet users access the internet via devices that are openly hostile to or outright disallow anything that would enable piracy. The devices are then connected to an internet that is further hostile and aims to steer you away from anything deemed unsavory

    Phones and tablets are cumbersome and unintuitive to navigate. In the case of apple torrent clients are not allowed to be listed on their app store and sideloading is involved and kind of a pain. Chromebooks and windows 11 are better obviously but less utilized then you’d think

    But that leads to the second point, which is kind of angry old man yells at cloud, but people are just less tech inclined now. It makes sense because modern tech is designed to oppress the user whereas tech in the late 90s and early 2000s was more to empower them. They don’t bother to figure out how to install applications, use the file explorer, change settings, etc. the very basic steps needed to pirate shit (you obviously don’t need to be a super hacker). They don’t need to. The command prompt or a terminal is something that makes them think you’re hacking shit

    They download applications like steam and then their browser auto opens the installer, then steam handles installing games and mods from that point on. They are safeguarded against having to deal with the icky filesystem and their hand is held every step of the way. Or they just download stuff from the official MS app store and even more hand holding. It’s okay because they’re only gonna install 5 streaming apps anyway and then use the browser to visit the 6 approved websites that google or bing search sends you to for basically any query.

    And that’s only if they actually have a proper computer. If they have a tablet or phone they either are pushed extremely heavily towards the above scenario, or in the case of apple they simply have no other option

    10 years from now the internet will just be 2-3 social media sites, a few shopping conglomerates, wikis, and streaming sites. The devices used to access will no longer let you access the filesystem directly, apps will be unable to be installed if they aren’t code signed by apple or google or ms or whoever, sealed in epoxy, and draconian drm everywhere. 40 years from now your grandchildren will think you’re weird for complaining about how you used to have autonomy and authority over your devices once you owned them and they’ll remind you it’s time to pay another $400 bezobucks to rent the google chrome ar internet hub for another month because you’re not allowed to own it and it’s a federal crime to take it apart

    • Grandwolf319
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 minutes ago

      While I agree with the trend for the average person, I think in pure numbers there are always going to be more tech savvy people in the foreseeable future.

      Sure, 80% of people online in the 2000s and 90s were all tech savvy hobbyists, but their numbers was low (let’s say a million).

      Now only 0.5% might be tech savvy, but that is 0.5% of a billion people, which would be 5 mil compared to 800k above.

      I obviously picked convenient numbers but the point still stands, there are lots of tech savvy places today and it’s growing, just not as fast as the non tech savvy crowd unfortunately.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I am personally still friends with two people who even know how to navigate their filesystem beyond clicking the downloads or my documents link in the start menu. I hope you’re right, but all I see around me at work and personal life is ignorance. People can’t even figure out how to use their phones beyond the basics.

        • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          I’m also inclined to believe what the other person was saying, because nowadays like you say people don’t know how to use their devices to their full potential, but then I remember there used to be a time when I was the only one with a smart phone and everyone else was looking at me like I’m a weirdo for being on this phone during a commute for example, something that today is normal.

          The nerdy people are still there and know how to use these tools, the general masses are still as clueless as always, they are just late adopters that never learned anything past what the walled gardens feed them. At least that’s my feeling.

        • Grandwolf319
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, on average you will find less and less tech savvy people in real life moving forward.

          But if you were to ask a programming question on the most popular coding site, you would get more responses today than 20 years ago.

          • Tekhne
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Yeah, but what’s the relative quality of responses? I feel like the bar for “tech savvy” or “competent at programming” has dropped precipitously. And unfortunately, the number of people confidently asserting a wrong answer online is high in my experience, including on programming forums.

            • Grandwolf319
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Think about it this way,

              Has the total number of C++ experts gone down since 20 years ago or has it gone up? The total market share has gone down, but total amount of systems running C++ has increased.

              Today is more lucrative to be an expert than 20 years ago, and there are far more positions that offer good money.

              It’s also easier to make money by knowing very little programming.

              So the question is, would the people capable of being a true expert avoid that path today even though it’s more lucrative, I don’t think so.

              The only difference is, 20 years ago, only the true experts were online, now they probably don’t enjoy being online as much and are probably big fans of old school hobbies (like wood working)

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Direct download piracy and streaming is surprisingly popular.

      With a bit of effort you can stream any movie directly to your TV for a few moneys a month (or free, but paying for the essential bits removes the jankiness)

      Basically you select the movie, a system finds the torrent or DDL, a service downloads it (or has it cached) and you stream it to your device.

      • nshibj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        With a bit of effort you can stream any movie directly to your TV for a few moneys a month (or free, but paying for the essential bits removes the jankiness)

        Something I learned back in the day: “Never pay for warez”. Pirate all you want, the moment you are paying, pay the creator of the product you’re interested in, not someone who pirated it and wants to profit from distributing it without a licence.

    • timestatic@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think the end is where some people are moving but I think its a bit too pessimistic. While kids are becoming more tech illiterate there is always gonna be a certain amount of people that know a bit more than the masses and they are not gonna let themselves be pushed around.

      • quixotic120@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What are they going to do? Manufacture their own silicon? The ability to make a computing device of reasonable power is fairly prohibitive and as things move forward manufacturers seem intent on doing things that are more and more hostile to consumers. You say people won’t let themselves be pushed around and that sounds nice but people have consistently done exactly that to date.

        Our power as individuals is minimal here; we can vote politically and financially. These companies do amazing financially so voting with our wallets doesn’t work. Voting politically also hasn’t done in terms of enacting regulation aside from some small wins in a few states with right to repair (and big losses in many more states as well as federally). And given the fact that those wins are small and fragmented with only a very small handful of states having any policy (like less than 10) it’s likely that big tech will push back hard rather than simply comply. And we are heading into political times where regulations will likely continue to erode.

        So as things worsen the people who “know a bit more” can have the choice of using cutting edge hardware that is more locked down, or being a stallman type that uses relatively ancient hardware full of compromises because it is compatible with an ideology. That is just but it also means they will be constantly hampered and the problem will only be compounded as technology becomes more advanced, which is inherent and constantly occurring

        This is also not just a generational thing to be clear. People my age, younger, and older, who were into this stuff have become tech illiterate as time progressed because they’ve allowed themselves to move away from their computers and go to their phones which have become a reddit/youtube/tiktok/pintrest/amazon/twitter/instagram/etc box. The etc is whatever skinner box game they’re playing at the moment, because most of them who played actual games don’t even bother to play games anymore. They’re so caught up in the cycle of “engagement” that they don’t care about much else. they come home and doom scroll then complain about how they feel aimless and anxious all the time and never get stuff done

        You’re right that there exceptions, but they seem to be dwindling

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I hate you. Because you’re not really wrong in most parts. Ownership of devices pisses me off for what feels like an eternity now. I can’t imagine how sales would go for PCs if you would get not admin-access anymore. But I smell that future coming. At least if we had not all switched to Linux by then. But even if, then the war between corpos and community would be on the “you can’t access amazon from this insecure decice”-front.

      Me, personally, currently live at the peak of piracy right now. The pinnacle I’ve dreamt of days back when selling wares on CDs for triple digits was a thing. Sonarr/radar/etc makes it so easy and awesome now. Enter a movie’s name, wait a minute, watch it.

      As to your Netflix/streaming-point: add that only muricans had it THAT nice. Some countries had to pay full price yet only got access to like 30% (Romania, Italy,etc.). The rest got filled with local crap. You saw the shit when using search but then it was gone. I had Netflix for a year or so. When it was more comfy than wares. And then it gradually became worse but also more expensive. The usual enshittification

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      tbf, there are alternatives to torrenting now. I usually recommend fmovies, sudo-lol, or other streaming websites because the barrier to entry for those sites is just knowing the URL and having ublock origin.

      I agree with you though that today’s young adults are not as technologically inclined as young adults of the early 2000s where torrenting was rampant. But everyone understands a website.

      Torrenting is hard compared to a visiting a website. Not only do you have to vet each torrent, you have to download a second piece of software (torrent client) to make sure it works, all the while making sure your router is set up correctly. And even if they set all this up correctly, they’ll get a letter/email saying that they downloaded a file illegally since they didn’t use a VPN. That will scare a novice user and stop torrenting.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Real-debrid is a weird one, it’s clearly you paying for piracy, but they’ve been around since forever.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I personally don’t have too much of an issue for paying for piracy. It’s money I would pay to Netflix if their catalog was decent.

          Servers cost money.

          If anything, these assholes streaming companies should see people paying for pirated content and say, “We should do better” instead of “ThEy ArE sTeAlInG oUr CoNtEnT!”

          Edit: I looked up Real Debrid. Their website is sketchy. What exactly is it?

          • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            They cache torrents, magnets and ddl links at an astonishing scale.

            You can put in pretty much any even decently popular magnet or ddl link set and get a direct download link with near infinite bandwidth (my 500Mbit connection is saturated every time)

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            My understanding is that it’s torrent and direct download caching on a massive scale, by file hash or something like that.

  • [email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    184
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Anon got it backwards, networks noticed how profitable Netflix was and bumped the price for Netflix to stream their stuff. Netflix responded by producing their own content rather than leasing others’ at exorbitant rates. Then Netflix later got greedy and bumped their prices, lowered their quality, and cancelled all of their good shows.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I think it’s a bit of both. Netflix knew that companies choosing to pull their content would be a threat, so they prematurely started producing content (famously starting with House of Cards and Orange is the New Black). Whether because they saw this as a threat or because of the perceived greater profitability of their own platforms (probably a bit of both), other studios started pulling their content from Netflix and setting up their own streaming sites.

      And naturally, other companies pulling their content accelerated Netflix’s desire to produce their own content to ensure they weren’t left in the lurch.

      • jballs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah I consulted for the cable industry around the time that everyone was just starting to try to build their own services to compete with Netflix. It wasn’t a secret that production companies would be pulling their content. There were licensing agreements signed that had expiration dates.

        So it was more like a race on both ends. Production companies were like “we get exclusive streaming rights to our movies back in X months, so we need to have our own platform up and running.” And Netflix was like “we lose streaming rights to these movies in X months, we need to make some content to replace it with.”

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yall are overcomplicating things. Let me simplify.

        Capitalist corporations + infinite greed = cannibalism

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 minutes ago

          That’s not overcomplicating it. That’s the exact impetus for Netflix to make their own content (nothing premature about it).

        • InputZero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s remarkable how people can see right past what was actually happening and only see what they want to see. Netflix was never trying to be the good guy. Netflix didn’t offer low prices out of the goodness of it’s hearts. It doesn’t have a heart, it has a ledger. The reason why Netflix offered a lot of content for a low price is because the company was trying to disrupt traditional cable. It was always the plan to increase prices, Netflix didn’t become greedy, it always was. It’s just that for a time the companies greed aligned with the publics greed. Once that relationship was no longer beneficial to Netflix it raised the prices, that was the plan all along.

          • MimicJar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            But that’s a zero sum argument. Every company is evil following that logic. No company does anything except for money.

            You can make that argument, but it isn’t unique to Netflix.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It doesn’t really matter, though. The only cause of companies pulling their content is Netflix’s success. There was no way Netflix could have prevented it.

      • [email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Unpopular opinion, but I wasn’t a fan. Was it a bad show? No! Did I enjoy it? Sometimes. How it developed the cult following that it has, I can’t quite piece together. Fantastic voice acting and sound design can only pull so much weight!

        • agamemnonymous
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          An excellent concept with some interesting opportunities, butchered by regressing it to the same kitschy formulaic plotlines as every other uninspiring adult animation show. I don’t want Big Bang Theory, I want Twin Peaks.

        • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Fantastic acting and production quality can elevate any media but especially TV shows. Look at Shrinking for a prime example. It has the production quality of Dispatches From Elsewhere but it’s essentially a three camera sitcom like Modern Family or hell All in the Family. And it’s KILLING right now.

          People like the humor of Inside Job and the fantastic quality made it so much better.

          • [email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I guess if you’re in the market for cola, you’ll look for the cola with the best taste. But seeing a discontinued cola lauded as a fallen behemoth is a bit odd, from my perspective

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Try the 70s.

    That was when VHS and cassette tapes started to hit the market and there was no copy protection on those. Following that, people copied floppy disks enough that they had to make that “dont copy that floppy” jingle.

    There was a brief period with the switch to digital and CDROMs where piracy stopped, but then CD burners hit the market and it started again.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It turns out in every era, copyright is a sham. Information in its natural state is free - our legal system tries to change that.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The laws around copyright are designed to prevent citizens from doing things.

        The laws around human rights are designed to preventing the government from doing things.

        The later expands your agency while the former restricts it.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    11 hours ago

    everyone is forced to pay for media

    Anon never copy vhs, cassette tape, cd, and dvd. I lived in southeast asia and pirated cd/dvd is openly sold in night market and low foot traffic part of the mall throughout the late 90s till early 2010s, only occasionally they got raid. Before that we basically record show from cable and rental then copy for each others.

    But yes, as GabeN proved again and again, piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem. Almost.

      • Sergio@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Even into the 90s, I remember making cassette tapes of the local college radio shows.

        One of my earliest memories as a little kid was my father putting a tape recorder in front of a record player speaker, and telling us all to be quiet because he was recording it. (Later on we got the fancier stereo with direct audio hookups.)

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Blatantly wrong. Netflix started producing their own shows because studios suddenly realized they could make more money charging for their own back catalog rather than leasing it to Netflix.

    Allowing production companies to be distribution companies / streamers is inherently problematic given that copyright is based around monopolies.

    • shovingleopardnsfw@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Netflix correctly knew they were first to market with a streaming service but every production company would quickly pivot to a streaming service, leaving Netflix with no content. So they preemptively started making their own content to try to keep their market share. Sadly their production bets often didn’t pay off.

      Tap for spoiler

      Y

  • shikitohno@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Even ignoring P2P predecessors to torrenting like Kazaa or Napster, there was still piracy early on. I guess it counts as piracy adjacent, but I got started buying bootleg anime boxsets off ebay, because the actual boxsets were like $200/season, and minimum wage was under $7/hour when I started, but I could get the same season on three DVDs from Hong Kong for $30. It wasn’t too long after that, I found out about fansubs and started spending far too much time on IRC, downloading anime, manga and music off XDCC bots. I wasn’t allowed to use bittorrent on the family machine, because “That’s like Kazaa, we’ll get sued into ruin,” but those bots in fansub group channels were fine, especially since it wasn’t immediately apparent looking at mIRC that I had one running too.

    • PagPag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 hours ago

      minimum wage was under $7/hour when I started

      It’s currently at $7.25 so think about how much you could afford now!

    • quixotic120@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My first piracy was trading dubbed (as in copied vhs tapes) anime tapes in the 90s because that was literally the only way to get it in small town america unless it was something huge like akira. Although the releases often were dubbed. Kids today don’t know how good they have it with arguing subbed vs dubbed. In the 90s you got what you got and that’s how you watched sailor moon