• Zloubida@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are many possible points of disagreement within Christianity because, like it or not, the Bible is unclear and even contradicts itself on many subjects (and this is a Christian saying this). But prosperity theology is so clearly the opposite of everything in the Bible that any self-respecting evangelical should ostracize it. That they don’t is the proof that the gospel is not what many evangelicals are interested in.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      To reinforce this, Jesus didn’t just say it was hard for a rich person to get into heaven, he said “And again I say unto you, it is easier for a camel to go through a needle’s eye, than for a rich [person] to enter into the kingdom of God.” --Matthew 19:23-26

      Personally, I think this is specifically referring to the level of greed that it requires to hoard enough wealth to become (and stay) a billionaire while the world suffers. It’s important to understand that this is our Bible, the foundation of everything Christianity is supposed to be about. These freaks have twisted it so much, it’s unrecognizable…

      • rami@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        fun fact, the “eye of the needle” isn’t referring to a needle. they’re small gaps in the big stone walls just big enough for a person to squeeze through but intentionally designed so that a camel cannot get in. he’s not even saying it’s metaphorically impossible he’s saying it’s literally impossible, and by design.

      • clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        No issues with you comment, but I find it disheartening that leadership in churches around the country do not condemn what is happening

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That’s how far we’ve come. I know many here are vehemently opposed to any faith-based belief system, and that’s 100% your right. But churches and religious leadership promoting Trump and hate are shitting on everything God said in the one book he gave us. Modern Christians should read the Bible and find a church that follows it. If possible. Not the other way around…

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It goes on though:

        When his disciples heard it, they were exceedingly amazed, saying, Who then can be saved?

        But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.

        So what I’m getting is “everyone goes to heaven, but don’t say that too loud or people will be dicks to each other”.

    • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 day ago

      What she cites the bible for

      Though she clarified that donations wouldn’t actually go to help those infected, White used medical imagery to add urgency to her fundraising plea during a pandemic. “Every single day we are a hospital to the sick, not necessarily the physically sick,” she said. “But we are a hospital for those who are soul sick, those who are spiritually sick.” White went on to suggest that contributors offer a $91 donation, citing Psalm 91, or “maybe $9 or whatever God tells you to do.”

      What I cite the bible for

      Matthew 21:12-13 Jesus entered the temple courts and drove out all who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. “It is written,” he said to them, “‘My house will be called a house of prayer,’ but you are making it ‘a den of robbers.’

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      You might enjoy reading some of the works of Bart Ehrman. I’m an atheist who has been reading a lot about Jesus and the early church (first three centuries). I would recommend, How Jesus Became God.

      Anyway, good for you for recognizing prosperity bs for what it is.

      • ChromaticSnail@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ehrman is great, as are his books and his podcast (which is called “Misquoting Jesus”). He’s one of the most objective mainstream New Testament scholars (in the field of textual criticism), and he doesn’t try to advance any agenda. He states clearly whether his points are the consensus of non-evangelical scholars, or whether he’s in the minority (which is rarely); whether other scholars disagree with him (and why); what the evangelical scholars say, etc. He doesn’t encourage either atheism or religion; he’s simply a textual criticism scholar.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s literally a sin in many sects, not to say those sects aren’t entirely hypocritical on the matter, but trading priestly duties for money is explicitly a sin in a lot of Abrahamic religions.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Gestures broadly at the pastors with their AMG Mercedes/M BMWs, mansions, private planes, helicopters, beach/mountain vacation houses, etc…"

      • Zloubida@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I like Ehrman. I think Jesus had, before the Resurrection, no clear idea of who/what he was and that what Ehrman shows is how the early church not invented but discovered the divinity of Jesus.

      • Zloubida@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Calvin was totally opposed to this kind of theology. I presume you’re referencing to Weber; but if you read The Protestant Ethic closely, he didn’t speak about mainstream Calvinism of his time, but German puritanism, which was opposed by mainstream Calvinism.