• NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sometimes, you are genuinely insightfully funny, and sometimes what you post makes me want to vomit.

      I appreciate that level of posting. It takes a very special kind of person to strike that balance.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I could almost buy that given my feelings about the mental capacity of the poster child for failing upwards, but why would he think specifically Haitian immigrants are lesbians? You know, as opposed to “liberals” or “college girls” (to quote the terrible song from that episode of Bill Nye - did you learn gay in college?) or something…

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    3 months ago

    Make all the “calls” you want. For someone to voluntarily resign under these circumstances, they need to feel guilt/shame. I’m not sure Vance is capable of either. He will not resign.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Cool. So fucking arrest him. He’s a public figure that knowingly and willingly endangered an entire population. Throw the book at his big fat eyelined face.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m not sure there is anything illegal about making up these stories.

      Edit: All these down votes are just wishful thinking. JD Vance is a piece of shit, but he hasn’t done anything illegal. (That’s not to say he hasn’t done anything wrong, because he totally has.)

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yelling “Fire!” in a crowded venue is not protected under Free Speech.

          I know that’s the famous example, but you’re actually wrong. It’s only not protected if there’s no fire, the person yelling it believes there is no fire, and the person yelling it is doing so to cause a panic or imminent lawless action. Speech protections in the US are extremely broad, and most of the exact lines and contours have been defined in court, often in cases involving the ACLU, the KK, or both (specifically in the form of the ACLU defending the KKK, which is where many of the lines as regards protests were determined).

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          This isn’t even close to the other, actual stochastic terrorism they’ve done before.

          If they were going to get charged for it, it shouldn’t be this one.

          Now, whoever runs the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire account, that feels like an actual crime.

          The cat thing should disqualify him as president because he’s blatantly lying. But it’s not a crime.

        • newfie@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Name the criminal statute he should be charged with violating.

          Agreed that he likely does not have a 1st amendment defense. But you still need a specific criminal statute to charge him with. I am unaware of any that he has likely violated with his xenophobic remarks

          Demagoguery that targets a marginalized group is an American tradition. It is unlikely that he committed any crime

          • cogman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Ohio could possibly sue him civilly because of the bomb threats that caused them to shut down schools. That’s the best I got.

            If anyone is hurt over this, then they likely have standing for a civil suit (see Alex Jones).

            Criminal it’s definitely more tricky. Trump will likely get away with telling his followers to storm the capitol, so I doubt “eating cats and dogs” comes close to the same standard.

            Once upon a time, admitting to something like this would have been an impeachable offense. But that’s long sailed as something Congress would fairly enforce.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Trump will likely get away with telling his followers to storm the capitol

              Because he didn’t. He very carefully didn’t. And 1A protections are extremely broad and extremely strong. Pretty much anything short of “You guys, go storm the capitol right now and overturn the election!” is going to be protected speech, and he didn’t say that. He carefully avoided saying that, intentionally.

              What they’ll get him on as far as the attack (if anything) will be if he was involved in planning and staging it on the back end - if for example he was coordinating with people who were directly instrumental in shifting it from a protest at the steps of the capitol to an attack on the capitol in the hours, days, or weeks beforehand. Because his speech was definitely 1A protected.

            • newfie@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              What are the enumerated elements of that per the statute, and how did Vance violate them?

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Agreed that he likely does not have a 1st amendment defense.

            He likely does. Pretty much anything short of directly inciting an immediate panic or imminent lawless action is protected.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    3 months ago

    Its about time there is some accountability for spreading such falsehoods. Does Libel not apply to this, or any law? Come on, he endangered an entire group of his own constituents. They are legally here.

    • boydster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      99
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      People need to call it what it is, as often as needed: stochastic terrorism

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s very similar to the concept of blood libel I think, just directed at a different group than that term usually refers to. Which, given what that kind of thing historically has led to, is extremely concerning coming from such a public figure.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        It is extremely concerning, and it is not just this. They have been talking about mass deportations all year.

    • Unfortunately and with deep regrets, I think it’d be tough. From https://lipskylowe.com/when-are-false-accusations-of-racism-defamation/ there are four points:

      False Statement about the target was stated as fact (not opinion)
      Publication or communication of that statement to a third person
      Fault on the part of the person making the statement amounting at least to negligence
      Harm to the subject of the statement (damages)

      Considering how hard he’s publicly pushed the story as a true fact, I think prongs 1 and 2 have been met. Alas, I can see 3 being not reached (he checked with his constituents who claimed the story was true and a judge accepts that as sufficient due diligence).

      And 4 would be the hardest - how does one prove damages (like a dollar amount) and that they were specifically caused by his comments?

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’d be hard but I thinks a case can be made by analyzing violence against the Haitian community before and after the comments. We have a date for when it was said, which can serve as our starting point for after. It might not be the easiest but its definitely within reason. On top of it all, I’m tired of this and thats by design. To so obviously be trashing and damaging these communities, but due to the law still have believable excuses. Its bullshit. We know and so do the rubes.

        • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Agreed. While not an expert, I feel like the bar for prong 3 has been lowered since I wrote the above - the original author has confessed to making it up, but Vance continued to promote the story after this and never officially retracted it.

          Prong 4 still is tough - to have standing to sue you’d have to be someone who was harmed. So likely a member of the Haitian immigrant community in Springfield (of which I am not a member) would have to be the one suing, AND would have to be able to personally demonstrate damages.

          Tough, but definitely possible within reason.

          Considering what else is at stake, that person would need solid legal representation.

          Assuming you aren’t a member either, the most you could do is lend support to folks out there, maybe reach out and see if anyone who has suffered is interested in a lawsuit and connect them to the right legal firms and such. Which is still enough to go a long way.

  • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This fucking lie ended a conversation (that started about plumbing of all things!) between myself and my father with me screaming at him for being racist and him hanging up on me saying “Enjoy your fucking liberal life. Im hanging up now. Love you. Bye.”

    As a rule, I do NOT speak politics with my family because theyre HUGE MAGAts and Im the exact opposite. But my father is one who HAS to bait me. He just…its in his fucking DNA code or something. And usually I grit my teeth through it, but I couldnt this time.

    Ughhhhh this pisses me off so much because I really thought that he would snort and roll his eyes at THIS lie at least. But no. He unironically believes this shit. Its fucking dangerous.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, therapists have noted a sharp upward trend of people dealing with politically driven grief. Basically, people separating from their family members due to political differences. And it’s almost universally from liberal people cutting off their Trump-crazed parents.

      • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        3 months ago

        This, I believe 100%. I just got assigned a new therapist and have only had one session with them so far. However, I know for a fact that this is going to be a massive topic that I need to unpack with them.

        It sucks because you just know all these parents will blame “the liberal media influencing the snowflake younger generation”, rather than having any introspection.

        I fear its going to make Boomers/Gen X even more radicalized than they already are, and double down on reforming schools to suit the Christian narrative.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh. I have relatives in the USA. Jewish and the older generation is sadly non-critical. Last family call ended where my uncle (strictly speaking, my mom’s uncle, son of my grandma’s older sister) dropped a phrase of “having to vote for someone who’ll support Israel” in such a worried tone, that I fscking couldn’t hold it. I mean, if my grandma wouldn’t try to shut me up with her Israel worship bullshit (she has always been, ahem, simple-minded and loud, and now she’s also of the age where people do not preserve a lot), could have gone better.

    • Imgonnatrythis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sorry man. My fam and I went separate ways about a year ago due to this stuff. It’s a sickness spread by a for profit entity which is the GOP. Doesn’t feel good at all, but things got so ugly that the silence between us now is a welcome form of peace at least.

      • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Im sorry you went through that, but Im glad you found peace. It sucks because I’m being pushed to consider going this exact route, so I know the pain/apprehension that went into your decision. Its a shitty place to be, and I have mad respect for you putting yourself first.

        It really sucks, because I dont hate them, I hate their politics and their inability to respect boundaries, but I know theyll never see it that way. They’ll see it as me breaking up the family because liberals are too sensitive or whatever.

        • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ve been dealing with this for a while now. Family kicked me out of the house for supporting Bernie Sanders at one point. It sucks, because I love them very much, but they’re Racist with a capital R and die-hard republicans who worship drumpf. Every time we talked they would bait me with their BS, and even when we’re NOT talking about politics, it seems every gap in conversation is punctuated with all the vile things they’re trying not to say.

          My therapist had some great advice. Said that if I value a relationship with them, then the price for having that relationship is never discussing politics.

          I’m willing to pay that price, so I told them not to bring it up anymore, and I’ll do the same. It’s working for the most part, though that doesn’t stop other issues from coming up. But hey, that’s life! Wouldn’t be relatives if they didn’t frustrate you endlessly, I guess?

          • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think them kicking you out over politics is, by itself, a good reason to go no-contact with them.

            • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Well it was only for a day, they thought they could intimidate me out of supporting the candidate I preferred. They are not perfect, but I still value a relationship with them 🤷‍♂️

        • Imgonnatrythis
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sounds like you’re going about it right at least - trying to set healthy boundaries is the best strategy to save such a relationship and if that fails you know for sure you just no longer have the foundation for any sort of meaningful progress.

    • xmunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 months ago

      Friend, it’s really not worth it. You can cut out family members that insist on drama but otherwise you can just keep radio silence on topics that aren’t mutually interesting.

      People can change their minds but it isn’t ever anyone outside forcing that change… significant changes always come from internal realizations.

      Just enjoy your life and keep your sanity - I’m sorry you were saddled with a family deeply entrenched in the MAGA crazy.

      • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thank you, I appreciate it. We’re pretty low contact as I live across the country, so I only really talk to him on holidays/birthdays to begin with, but this was an odd one-off.

        I mostly really stay in contact at all because my brother has 2 babies, and the entire family is conservative (to the point that theyre considering home schooling the kiddos), and Im worried theyll never get ANY outside influence if my husband and I dont make an effort.

        Its probably a worthless effort, because mentally I can only handle going home every year or so (and I make it as close to a 72 hr trip as possible), but I just feel like Im abandoning them completely if I cut everyone off now.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      If it helps, realize that it’s his insecurity coming out. Don’t be mad, be sad. Can you imagine being an adult and stilling acting like an edgy teen.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I refuse to talk politics with my family, regardless of who they endorse. It’s not worth the arguments.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, I don’t even like talking politics with people I agree with. My parents are lifelong Democrats and despise Trump, but they are absolutely obsessed with him in the same way that pro wrestling fans are obsessed with the latest heel. They just can’t stop talking about him and whatever his latest line of bullshit is. Whereas my only hope for sanity is to tune this shit out as much as I possibly can.

      • reka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I refuse to talk any subject which has multiple potential perspectives on with my dad. Even if I agree with him he makes me feel shit. That boomer self righteousness is repulsive.

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I recommend disengaging immediately whenever they start to talk about politics. Hang up the phone, leave the room, etc. Tell them you won’t discuss politics with them, but other than that, don’t say a single word to them on any other topic until they agree to quit doing it. Rinse and repeat.

      • 4lan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I started just hanging up on my dad exactly like you said, we haven’t spoken in over a year. The last call was him defending the sex trafficking of a 14-year-old in Marine Barracks…

  • Fester@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This increases my gut feeling that Vance has eaten someone’s cat from about 60% to 95%.

    I am 95% sure that this fucker has, at some point in his life, eaten someone’s cat.

  • rustydrd
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The crazy thing is: If he hadn’t admitted this, there wouldn’t have been calls for his resignation. The Republican party is fine with spreading harmful misinformation, but admitting to it is a no-go.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Republican party needs to have plausible deniability. In the conservative playbook, it’s okay to repeat things that they know for a fact are untrue, or to tell a lie of omission to further their agenda, because they can always walk it back at the point in time which they are receiving blowback by saying they didn’t know it wasn’t true or that they didn’t have all the facts at hand. Assuming that the lie doesn’t manifest itself into truth or that there are enough people who care enough about the real truth to bother fact checking it at all to the point where it would necessarily generate any kind of controversy.

      This was Vance saying the quiet part out loud, probably by accident, and his pivot was not convincing at all.

  • bean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    3 months ago

    “If I have to create stories so that the American media actually has to pay attention to the suffering of American people, then that’s what I’m going to do,” said Vance, a U.S. Senator representing Ohio.

    Ironically, Vance’s attempt to point out imagined “suffering” has led to actual suffering by his own constituents.

    Wow. What a horrible piece of shit. I knew he was ‘bad news’. But like. God damn. You’re a fucking moron. A perfect Trump pick for VP.

    If my eyes rolled back any further I’d go blind.

    • BigDanishGuy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      Or, and I know it’s going to sound like a conspiracy theory, Trump picked JD because JD is so weird, and he knew that JD would tank. So when Trump drops JD it’ll give him a boost, like the one the democrats got when Biden dropped out. Trump has repeatedly kept lowering people’s expectations, to the point that if he somehow managed to put the round peg in the round hole, it would be a success. So imagine the boost Trump would get, for making the obvious decision to drop JD.

      But that plan requires that Trump is able to play the long game, and stay quiet about it. Two things we know isn’t plausible.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        They have so many people stacked at the polls and swing states that they’re not worried about actually winning by performance.

      • TopRamenBinLaden
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        If there is any conspiracy here, I would be more likely to believe the one where JD Vance was a plant whose goal is to sabotage Trump’s campaign.

        Although, I still think it’s most likely that they are just incompetent idiots, and aren’t sabotaging themselves on purpose at all.

        • BigDanishGuy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Oh I totally think you’re right in applying Hanlon’s razor here. The opposite would spell doom.

          But sometimes you’ve got to wonder how incompetent can they be. And at those times “they’re not babbling buffoons, it’s a clever ruse” seems a plausible explanation. I mean Trump parading his mistress on the campaign trail, what the actual fuck?

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        There were theories that when RFK jr flipped they wanted him at the VP candidate hard, but they were already stuck with Vance. Conspiracy theory time…they’re purposely tanking the already wildly unpopular Vance so it wouldn’t seem like such a fickle move.

      • Fugtig Fisk@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        But it sounds like he can’t drop JD. It is not an option and i am sure someone would have told him this, if it was his plan

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 months ago

    Trump is 100% going to blame this loser when he fucks the election up, and the following insurrection attempt.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If Trump loses in November he’ll be in jail by January. The sentencing has already been scheduled. If the election is going to be stolen it’ll have to be stolen when the votes are cast or counted, not when the election is certified.

      • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        he’ll be in jail by January.

        Sigh - no he won’t, so can we stop pretending like he will ever face punishment for anything?

        • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I would believe a “house arrest” at Maralago. A house arrest where he gets to pick his security and visitors like Columbia Colombia did with Escobar.

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would believe a “house arrest” at Maralago.

            I would too, unless Congress revokes his Secret Service detail. Secret Service protection is what makes imprisoning him difficult, it’s either house arrest or they rededicate an entire prison wing to just him.

            I wouldn’t let him pick his security and restrict his visitors though. And absolutely no internet or social media. It’s supposed to be a punishment, after all.

          • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think he’d just ditch to someplace with no extradition so he can keep gassing up domestic terrorists from abroad.

  • tty5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 months ago

    There should be calls to toss him into a volcano and they should be getting serious traction

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      The people calling for it want him to resign as I’mSenator. It’s not really resigning if they just pick a new VP nominee

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    “In the wake of JD Vance admitting he ‘created’ the pet-eating story, and as a result of the very real threats the communities and people he has targeted are now under … I am calling on him to RESIGN as our Senator,” Weinstein posted on Twitter/X.

    Let’s hope he remains on the ticket for VP, though. I’d hate for the orange bad to backfill him with someone more likable (by their standards) and have an uptick.

    • Corkyskog
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      It would be funny to see all the campaign signs and stickers replaced.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I feel like they kinda have to stick with Vance on the ticket at this point. Past the deadline, ballots are already being printed and such.

      Though maybe that’s just for the top of the ticket, I don’t know.

      Also it would require Trump to admit he made a mistake, so it seems unlikely he’ll be off the ticket.

  • TheWormInRFKJrsBrain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The Trumpublican voters knew it was a lie from the beginning, they don’t care about truth. Vance supplied them with phony story to justify racism and create outrage and they were happy to play along.

    It’s a sick game and when people rightly pointed out what a farce the whole thing was they were simply dismissed by the magachuds as “sheeple” and “libtards”.

    There is no reasoning with these brain rotted cultists

    Their candidates are quite literally the worst possible choices and they LOVE THEM

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Here’s the thing, Vance didn’t make up the story, a Nazi did. I’m guessing Vance is now claiming responsibility because lying about the origin is better than the truth, that he’s just repeating lies from self avowed Nazis.