• OneMeaningManyNames@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Terminally online”

    Now look, half of Lemmy is terminally online, those people you talk about are simply racists.

  • 3 dogs in a trenchcoat@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    where you can change pronouns of your main character

    As if choosing your player character’s gender hasn’t been a common thing in video games for decades

    • tmyakal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dark Souls 2 has a mechanic to swap your character’s gender whenever you want to. From is already okay with genderfluid protagonists.

      • voldage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        There was an outrage about that either back when Dark Souls 2 came out, or when they added that to the game - I vaguely remember there not being anything worth note just after the game came out. Either way, “some people” freaked out about it, and the controversy got some wind in the sails due to the gamergate culture war being a thing back then.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      The very idea of having a choice feels threatening to their tiny minds. Like, just choose to be a white cis man if it’s really all that important to you.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not to mention everybody will have pronouns now! Previously we were just referring to the individuals by the individuals’ names, of course.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why would they? Actors, politicians, etc openly show hate and there’re no meaningful consequences. It’s accepted now…

      • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        guess it’s time to be as aggressively anti-bigot when they are being aggressively racist/homophobic 🤷🏻

  • eezeebee@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    2 days ago

    Elden Ring already has gender fluidity, a strong female POC, people with physical and mental disabilities, and homosexual implications. “Wokeness” should be the least of their concerns about what Sony could do to From.

    • fsxylo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 days ago

      Elden ring already has body A body B customization. These chodes have never played elden ring and may be Russian.

  • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    Black people and homosexuals? Omg, can you imagine trying to play a game when the NPCs have a different race or sexuality than you do? It must be impossible.

    Do I need the /s?

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any time sometime terrible happens, the worse people will try and claim it as a victory. Sony buying From Software is terrible, but not because of some imagined spector called DEI.

    • coyootje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      And the possibility of it turning into a Playstation exclusive once again. Or at the very least a game developed for Playstation with a terrible PC port.

    • Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep, the main thing I worry about. But the parent company that the Sony is considering buying owns only like 65% of From Software. So maybe from software will have some leeway and they can put their foot down and say they don’t want to use PSN. Maybe? Hopefully? Otherwise, elden ring will be the last game that I bought from them.

    • dvlsg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      And having to wait a year and a half.

      Or longer, if they decide to go the bloodborne route.

  • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    God when did racism, homophobia, and misogyny become the new opinions you can hold instead of developing an identity.

    It was obnoxious enough with pineapple pizza hate and clown fear.

    • Funkwonker@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      God when did racism, homophobia, and misogyny become the new opinions you can hold instead of developing an identity

      Honestly? Maybe sometime around mid-late 2015 after Donald announced his first run for president.

      The moment he was taken seriously, it emboldened all the chuds.

      Upon further thought, I believe that year also marked the start of what led to Brexit as the UK Conservative Party won a majority. Not a great year.

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Uhhh, like, 50 AD, I think? Or if you’re talking about bottoming, like 1000 BC. People have always been lame

    • BreadOven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Only reason I wouldn’t play it is because I still suck at the first one. (I have to give it another try though, then I would totally play a second one)

  • Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What if from software makes a character that’s biologically male, but gets raised as a woman because of his moon powers? That would be so woke.

  • sag@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t wait to play a woke game ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° ) but Fuck Sony. Sony should be last option ( ; ω ; ).

  • kitnaht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Sony are actually the people who dictate that Spiderman remain straight and white though. It’s in all of his license agreements. Doesn’t have sex under the age of 16, doesn’t have sex with anyone under the age of 16, is white, is hetero, doesn’t swear over pg-13, symbiote is not peters design, lived/raised in queens, gains powers during high school, and a bunch of other things.

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Wiki says he’s an “Alternate Spiderman”. Alter Egos have an exception from what I understand. He’s from another universe according to Marvel. He’s not Peter Parker. It’s specifically Peter Parker who must be all these things.

    • Firestorm Druid@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s interesting. Have they been told by Marvel to make it that way or do Sony hold rights over Spider-Man to an extent where they can dictate his appearances on screen? I remember hearing that Sony kinda owns Spider-Man for the movies or something? Not sure

      • kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Honestly, I’m not sure - not a fan, just a dude who picks up on random tidbits of information.