• kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This isn’t a leaopards eating faces thing for republican women. These women derive social, economic, and political benefits through their association with the men who hold power in our patriarchal system. By aligning with backwards gender roles or evil ideologies, they feel protected and valued within the system even as it restricts their autonomy. They know what they’re doing.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They do, but there is an assumption that the relationship between women like that and the wealthy ruling class men they attach themselves to is reciprocal. It, of course, is not.

      Take the woman who has a child by Elon Musk. Her and Musk had a romantic getaway and brief liason. She clearly wasn’t upset at being pregnant by him. There was an assumption that she’d be cared for. Even if not directly, indirectly. She definitely did not anticipate that she would actually be confined to an apartment 24 hours a day, entirely neglected without any contact from the father of her child. Nor that she’d be left with a child to raise on her own, and no support either financial or emotional or in terms of literal labor.

      Call her ignorant and bigoted, both are valid criticisms. But she absolutely was not anticipating this outcome. There is a presumption from conservative/fascist women that they occupy a position of hierarchy over non-fascist/non-conservative women. That by virtue of supporting fascism and patriarchy that fascist men will afford them personhood. They don’t believe in any of the assertions of feminism. They instead believe that women who suffer at the hands of men simply deserve it. That all women are judged in some kind of meritocracy, where belief in fascism and support of fascists itself is a determining factor of merit.

      They are infuriatingly wrong. But do not be so quick to mischaracterize all conservative/fascist women as knowingly participating in the elimination of their own rights. They are systematically indoctrinated. Inexcusably, I will add. There is no justification for supporting fascists, no justification for supporting violence against women. To combat the ideology they espouse it is crucial to understand not just what they say but what they think.

      • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The wondrous simultaneity of having free will while being a product of the universe that created you.

        When push comes to shove though, what do we do, remove a person’s agency and look at the environment, or allow them their agency and make them responsible for their choices?

        I feel like answering this paradox is akin to reconciling quantum mechanics with general relativity.

    • GrumpyDuckling
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They just want to sit at home during the day taking queludes and fucking the mailman.

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Ok so

    As a single WASP (ok well, I grew up protestant) male in my 30s, who has the confidence of an abandoned kitten, how exactly does this benefit me?

    Like I feel like this is supposed to be about men like me getting more power over women. But I fail to see how that helps me at all.

    All I can see is that they start here, remove voting rights next, then they remove the ability for women to be licensed to be doctors, or lawyers, dentists, etc. That’s gonna fuck my life up immensely.

    Just so women can’t have a say? Why?

    Conservative views on women are absolutely confusing. I know we have to abandon logic with them, but maybe that’s the part I don’t understand: how the fuck do I think without logic?

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      It’s not about what’s good for you, it’s about what’s good for the people in power. And as women increasingly turn away from the Republican party, they’re going to want to disenfranchise them.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s the thing: it isn’t. The patriarchy is bad for 95% of men, as well, but a huge chunk of those believe it’s good for them because at least they’re not a woman.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Remember the MAGA women wearing the “You Can Grab My Pussy” shirts? Not all Republican women are going to be upset by this.

    • QuantumSparkles
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I had to look that up to see if it was real, and sure enough—but I honestly shouldn’t be surprised. Utterly fucking revolting. On the other hand, the tee website display of a black man wearing it while saluting is pretty hilarious

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’m not from the US: What happened to Katie Britt, who gave her response to Biden’s State of the Union address from her kitchen? Is she happy now? I mean, not that I wanted to criticize anyone, but that was totally obvious even before the election.

  • tree_frog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m not sure if the article covers it, still reading, but one of the things they want to do to disenfranchise transfoks is to require the the name on your birth certificate matches you’re legal name in order to vote.

    As most married women don’t change their name on their birth certificate when they take their husbands last name, they would not be able to vote either.

    Edit: The article does go into all of this.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Long term, this seems like an effective way to end that custom. What person would go into marriage changing their name when they know this attitude is at play?

    • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Holy. Fucking. Shit. That’s bad. That’s oppressively stupid fucking bad.

      Hey Americans: Don’t want to be oppressed or live in a fascist state? Immigrate to Canada! We’re hella friendly and open to people’s of all kinds, except MAGAs and Nazis and or maga-nazis

      • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Ha, if only that was an actual possibility. Most Americans will not qualify for immigration to Western countries.

        I’d also hold off on thinking you’ll be safe. Poilievre might be unpopular now, but there’s a lot of time between now and the election. It’s not a slam dunk for Liberal, fascism can absolutely still rise in your country too.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m still happy with Massachusetts, but my company is based in UK and we have an office outside Toronto. The road is paved

      • Kecessa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Eh…

        We’re not a consolation prize, they’ve let shit get fucked in their country for decades.

        • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah. You’re absolutely right, but there’s still a ton of good Americans that Canada could utilize to help us build our industry that we need.

          We need more than just exploited real estate in this country, and I’m sure a ton of Americans could help us make that happen at an accelerated level.

          I’d much prefer to take in Americans that are disenfranchised with their country, than have a disenfranchised country try and turn us into a new Guam.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m moving to Sweden but I’ll be stopping by your way first! I’m too trans to let tsa look at my passport so I’m going to land travel to you all and take a plane out from there

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I would move up there next week if it was that easy and didn’t mean probably losing my awesome job. Oh, and it might be a bit disruptive for my family, too.

        • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Hmm. You all raise a good point. As Canadians, I think we need to make it easier for Americans to immigrate here.

          We need to experience and expertise and we need to learn how to expedite that to bring the right people here to help expand Canadas capabilities.

          Canadians, how to we make this happen? I have zero knowledge how to make this happen.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            You guys seem to have a very open asylum policy. Give it a few years and a lot of Americans might qualify without you doing anything else.

      • QuantumSparkles
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I was going to say, “no, stay and fight”, but on second thought I agree with this sentiment for more vulnerable groups like trans folks

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yep, that’s in there:

      House Republicans passed a bill (which stalled in the Senate) this session to require citizens to have a passport or birth certificate matching their name to vote.

    • Banana
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Interesting thing about that is that, while it’s still common practice, a lot of more left-leaning women did away with taking their husband’s name years ago

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah my wife and I just kept our name. Its funny because over the years we sorta wish we would have done the traditional thing as it would make a variety of things easier but now apparently its becoming a brilliant move.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          We got married ten years ago and she didn’t take my name. I’m very much cool with it, and it’s got easier over the years.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            yeah it was a slow burn annoyance and she gets annoyed by it more than I but it took like 20 odd years to be like. This is sorta annoying. EDITED - hey so im rethinking and it started at about the 10 year mark and built up over time but as I said its little things. My wife has a lot of medical issues though so we might have more nuisance around it than the typical couple.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              20 minutes ago

              We all got our struggles. Ours are shitty and I’m sure you guys have shitty ones too. Fucking life is shitty. All we can do is try to help our people out when we can.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 hours ago

            yeah its more problematic for official stuff really. like being in the hospital. Its not much but like you tend to have to make it more clear your the spouse.

      • tree_frog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Left leaning women are also far less likely to get married to begin with.

        The article actually points all of that out, it will be Republican women who mostly are disenfranchised by this.

        • phdepressed
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 hours ago

          In a sort of twisted way that could result in a blue wave if they disenfranchised ~half of their own voters and not the left.

          • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 hours ago

            They’ll presumably remedy this by giving husbands extra votes on behalf of their wives and children, as in Franco-era Spain.

        • Banana
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My mom never took my dad’s so I grew up with that being the norm, so I took it step further and my partner and I are not even married despite being together 11 years.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 minutes ago

            Yeah my partner and I didn’t get married until 8 years deep, and that’s going steady. We were fucking on and off for years before. We did it to appease our family. Never had any kids thank the hole in the ozone.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It depends on how much paperwork you do when you change your names, how much autocracy you want to fight

        When my ex divorced me she warned me me she wasn’t going through that again so I just need to deal with her keeping my name. She kept half of everything else of mine so I guess it’s no difference

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Well that was the thing. If we did it off the bat it was like a checkbox, but to do it later is a larger nuissance than the nuissance of them being different.

      • tree_frog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        If it’s a legal name change. But I assume a lot of Hollywood names aren’t legally changed, but more similar to a pen name.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 hours ago

    They needed conservative women to vote this felon. And now they don’t need them because he plans to stay forever. This will happen with everyone that supported him. He has disdain for everyone except himself. He will turn on everyone. His ego is massive and he is power trippin’ right now. I can’t wait until he tries to fire the Supreme Court and not replace anyone. Trump Jong Un coming soon. When they complete a border wall with Canada, we are locked in.

    • Peppycito
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I sure would like a wall, but that doesn’t seem to be the plan.