• redlemace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As should europe. Clearly you can’t trust the USA anymore. What is the long-term prospect for spare parts?

      • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “No u” come on with the childish shit. Yes we could trust Europe you dumb dumb. America literally wouldn’t exist without French support but you wanna be a contrarian so bad you just ignore everything and type out this moronic dribble

        • ANNOFlo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can even look into much closer history - look at the participants of Enduring Freedom. Nice to see how respected the life’s of our citizens, who died in Afghanistan or elsewhere, are to people like that.

      • ANNOFlo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Kindly - shut up. All those countries you don’t trust followed America into Afghanistan, many into other wars. All lost citizens in support of American and joint interests, we did our part, as allies should. Guess we now know who is the real untrustworthy partner, and I doubt any of us will forget the betrayal anytime soon.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The aircraft has significant security risks for sure and makes sense to cancel. But canceling the order won’t be on Trump’s radar unless it affects his inner circle of evil billionaires who have funneled dark money to him.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Canada should cancel the F-35 contract and their are better fighter jets from reliable NATO allies. The F-35 is a $2 trillion USD turd that is still not 100%. If Canada continues to purchase US weapons, this would be like Poland buying weapons from Nazi Germany. I am hoping the US MIC becomes pissed off.

  • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Goddamn right we should. Take the French up on the offer to build the Rafale here. Or the Swedes. And get a few demo units for short term.

    Fuck 'em on any cancellation fees too. Consider it partial compensation for the ridiculous trade war.

    • NIB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      None of those airplanes even have similar capabilities. Why do you think the entirety of Europe has ordered so many F-35.

      The only alternative is to wait 15+(realistically 20+) years for a 6gen plane from Europe. And with the alliance dying, who knows how much longer it will take now

      Rafale and Gripen are more expensive and in many ways, less good. There is a reason why noone is buying them, or even if they did, they still want to buy more F-35.

      • RaskolnikovsAxe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        F35 is far more expensive to operate, so you end up paying more over the lifetime if you actually use it.

        Of course the other aircraft don’t have a bunch of fancy features of the F35, but maybe we don’t need them, particularly in light of the US hostility and unpredictability. And the benefit of building our own is a factor as well.

        As I undertand it, the F35 has only about 55% readiness and suffers SW problems as well.

        The US is not the only game in town, and we need to be clear about that.

      • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The gripen is more agile than the f35 and capable of austere landings. Arguably more important traits than the ability to carry American nukes.

        • NIB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          Being agile is kinda irrelevant if one can detect, lock and launch missiles tens of kilometers before the other plane can even detect it. Real life is not Top Gun. This is why everyone is buying the F-35.

          There is a reason why China is spending billions designing and making stealth fighters, bombers and drones.

          Agility isnt useless but it is highly overrated mostly by Russia, because they cant afford to produce(in relevant quantities) a stealth plane.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Why do you think the entirety of Europe has ordered so many F-35.

        The reason for Germany is that other aircraft, by choice, have not been certified for use with US nuclear weapons.

        • NIB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Nuke capability is irrelevant for most countries(rafale has a nuke capable variant, though only for French nukes). Take a look at its operators

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_operators

          Everyone who can get it(allied to the US), has already ordered it or will soon. The only exceptions are Sweden and France, who wanted to maintain some degree of strategic independence and not lose their jet fighter building capability. And Spain, though Spain was also kinda thinking of getting F-35 too(before Trump).

          Canada was like Sweden and France, they could manufacture capable planes. But this is immensely expensive. Thats why Canada(and most countries) stopped doing it. This is why the F-35 is cheap, economies of scale, and why countries are willing to wait 5+ years to get it(while rafale and Gripen are basically readily available).

          Europe wanted to coast through 5gen planes by using the F-35 while skipping ahead and developing, 2 completely different apparently, 6gen planes by 2040ish.

  • Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    The US can remotely disable them whenever they damn well please anyway, and can not be trusted not to.

    Everyone should be canceling their orders immediately, and disable the remote access capabilities to the ones they have.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Has it actually been confirmed they can do this? I would assume they backdoor them, but usually backdoors are secret.

      • Shadow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        19 hours ago

        They require software updates for every mission, that are distributed from the US.

        You can probably fly / use it without those, but you lose all the advanced command & control features

        • piccolo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Let me guess… microsoft designed it.

          • Brumefey
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            « You need to take off RIGHT NOW! » « I can’t . Upgrade in progress ! »

            • No1@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Post on TechHelp:

              "I keep hearing the missile connecting and disconnecting.

              Has anyone got the latest driver for a Sidewinder AIM-9L?"

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They don’t function without phoning home to a US-controlled server every 24 hours.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Some high ranking US intelligence dude said something along the lines of that yeah. I dont think anyone has hacked into one of them to check or reverse engineer the code tho.

  • yannic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The PM agrees with The Globe and Mail once and now they think they’ll get two in a row?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    100% TODAY! Do not pay a fucking dime of any amount owing for these. (good job on Globe and Mail for a change)

    FYI, the Israeli version of F35 does not have this “US permission for every flight required”

    F35 is a POS plane, with low uptime, in addition to “broken ownership”. Even US military does not get manuals on how to repair/maintain them and must hire Lockheed consultants to do the job. The whole program was a boondoggle to pay Lockheed the most money possible instead of getting good military equipment, and any corrupt POS that was involved in approving this purchase for Canada should be jailed for treason.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      There’s nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software. Most of the FUD about it’s performance abilities is propaganda. So getting them and just locking out Lockheed and the US would be a pretty good middle finger too.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The performance metrics are criticisize by US military journals.

        There’s nothing stopping Canada from getting the manuals and patching the software.

        If US military can’t get them or patch the software, Canada can’t either. Israel is special for not putting up with US BS.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I haven’t seen that. I’ve only seen blogs saying stuff. And if you have the literal hardware in your hands then changing the software isn’t going to be hard as a country.

          • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            8m lines of source code for F35 OS, afaiu. Vendor is intentionally crippling your access/functionality, and USMCA calls that “proper pro business attitude”. Again, Lockheed has accomodated Israel in not crippling their version. It’s not as though you have open source hardware to which to code your own OS ontop.

            Only dumping the POS is appropriate. Call it a negotiation position.

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    18 hours ago

    American here. Who cares if it provokes Trump? Actions have consequences. Canada helped out a lot during 911. What did we do? Prove to be an unreliable partner

  • opi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I don’t think Canada should be basing their defense decisions on the opinion and thin skin of the American government. Trying to force Canada, in any way, to purchase F35’s is fishy - not that that’s happening, of course.

    Canada’s interests are for Canada. Not them. Also, maybe Canada should reboot their ventures into the Avro Arrow program again. That’ll ruffle some feathers. Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Canadian engineered military = quite formidable, I think.

      Here’s the bad news. It’s not. Sure, we’re good at peacekeeping, and we deploy to support (militarily) our allies. But we’re using US gear and we’re woefully underfunded because war budget has been declared a waste by even the parties who strut and posture about a strong military. We only needed to fulfill our NATO obligations, for decades, and even that has been a struggle we haven’t won consistently with the low budget.

      And while we’re skilled enough and gung-ho, and our 1st Pioneers are about the most scary bunch of lumberjack commandos you’ll ever see, there’s just so few of them, and again their gear has been called old and out of repair by every administration campaigning because the last one never did a thing about it.

      We’re gonna need a lot of funding and training and gear to make up the shortfall in people and powpow toys, and that’s a slice of gov pork that Milhouse is gonna latch onto knowing that he doesn’t need an army once he gives the country over. Justin doesn’t want to spend that, but he - and please God let it be Mark next - is really gonna have to.

      But how do we sell it to the “hair guy bad” flatlanders steeped in 12 years of hating Justin for not being a pseudo-aristocratic milquetoast conservative?

  • merc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Any NATO member increasing their military spending would be idiotic to spend their money with US-based companies.

  • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    20 hours ago

    With tariffs hammering F-35 sales, I expect the next Eurofighter project will have a lot more resources. I wonder if Canada will get involved.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Sweden also offered to get us building our own Gripens totally locally. The page for the bid is even still up

      I assume we already have pilots trained in flying the F-35 at this point, which sucks if we’re never getting them, though.

      • wirebeads@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This would be amazing for us to bring back military building here in Canada!!

        • HellsBelle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Especially since the Americans are the ones who convinced us they had enough fighter jets to take care of us so we could/should cancel the Arrow. :/

      • barbarossa@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Absolute bozo move to not go for this in retrospect. They need to give this a look again asap

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          If I had hair, I definitely would have been pulling it out at the time. It’s not like this situation came out of nowhere, but normalcy bias won the day.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Nah, y’all should accept delivery then refuse to pay. Give him a taste of his own medicine.

  • Franklin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    ooh no, it might provoke the person who is back stabbing us at every conceivable opportunity

  • Tramort@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Hell yeah they should. We need to be able to defend ourselves against southern aggression, and the F35 is compromised based on what Trump himself threatened.